Young Global Leaders is a program that the WEF runs, and the people on that list are those that graduated the program.
The people listed on the WEF's main website seem to be people that have interacted with the WEF in some form, such as written articles or participated in one of the conferences, or being on the board of trustees. Not everyone on the list has to drink the kool-aid as much as others, but the forum's founding purpose has not changed.
School shootings became prominent because of gun laws not despite them. The second we said no one can be armed in places, those places became the highest targeted by an overwhelming margin that didn’t exist before.
That's not what I said though I bet you have quite a few instances where you've run afoul of even the Bill of Rights in your opinions.
The point is : if you want NPC like "We all agree on everything all the time", you'll find yourself quite alone quite quickly, and probably run afoul of your own standard given enough time.
That's what it means to have a purity test. It's basically SJW echo chambers.
Why would anyone care what a gun grabbing hippy thinks? She would walk us up right up to the rope then cry as it is wrapped around our necks.
She's also a WEF "Young Global Leader"
Awww, Klaus' kids are growing up and stabbing each other in the back, just like real globalists.
Sometimes I feel the WEF just puts people on their list of "Young Global Leaders" to fuck with them.
Other times, you can see those that clearly drank the kool-aid, like Trudeau.
Young Global Leaders is a program that the WEF runs, and the people on that list are those that graduated the program.
The people listed on the WEF's main website seem to be people that have interacted with the WEF in some form, such as written articles or participated in one of the conferences, or being on the board of trustees. Not everyone on the list has to drink the kool-aid as much as others, but the forum's founding purpose has not changed.
https://www.weforum.org/people/vladimir-putin
You can't imagine someone having some good beliefs and some, in your opinion, bad beliefs?
That will probably disqualify the entire human population.
Hers are logically inconsistent, to an extreme.
I oppose the crackdown on the truckers, and I also don't want free gun ownership in my country.
But I'm European, and no one here wants free gun ownership.
School shootings became prominent because of gun laws not despite them. The second we said no one can be armed in places, those places became the highest targeted by an overwhelming margin that didn’t exist before.
Well if we cant agree on everything, then i guess yall should just give up. No crossover = no future country.
True, if she does anything that doesnt perfectly match up with our views, we should ignore her and tell to stfu.
Keep out the only remotely sensible democrat, that will save our country!
Most people who impose purity tests on others probably wouldn't even pass those purity test themselves.
Imagine saying follow the bill of rights is a purity test.
That's not what I said though I bet you have quite a few instances where you've run afoul of even the Bill of Rights in your opinions.
The point is : if you want NPC like "We all agree on everything all the time", you'll find yourself quite alone quite quickly, and probably run afoul of your own standard given enough time.
That's what it means to have a purity test. It's basically SJW echo chambers.
Tell me, are you white knighting because you’re retarded or just that much of a coward you would sell your born rights to simp?