I see a few problems with laws like this, beyond the obvious problem that it's an abhorent abrogation of free speech. And speech is already subject to too many restriction in Canada.
First, I look at it from the perspective that supporters of such a bill simply aren't interested in knowing the truth about the Holocaust. They like the version of history that's been settled on, which is coincidently the version written by the victors as it always is, and they don't want any uncomfortable questions or evidence to emerge that might undermine that perspective. Many groups have managed to extract power from the current understanding of the facts about the Holocaust, and have imposed a cowing guilt and extraction of recompense from others. Few ever give up power once they're grasped it.
Second, I see the possibility that many people truly believe that we've arrived at the true reckoning of the events surrounding WW2. Any further questions will only draw us away from the truth, and they believe questions about the Holocaust will only cause harm to innocent people today. It seems a naive perspective, but I can accept many people hold it.
Many liars have been exposed over the years claiming to have had horrifying experiences during WW2, like Joseph Hirt, who are simply taken at their word as they profit from their victimhood as prominent speakers only to admit to lying later in life. If it's illegal to deny aspects of the Holocaust, it's illegal to question the accounts of liars as long as they generally align with the accepted narrative, and it's made exceedingly difficult to expose these types of charlatans. The same can be said of governments. The legal truth just becomes a pack of lies clinging to the decaying husk of truth, and we'll have removed our ability to pare it down to what's actually real.
It's a bad law, as are virtually all laws that limit speech. Most people already accept that the Holocaust happened, that it was terrible, and would best be avoided in the future. Most disagreements surround the details, the figures and motivations of the groups involved. There's no harm in sharpening our understanding of the truth about that.
Besides which, I'll never be told by government what I'm allowed to say or think. I'm open to persuasion when it comes to speech and thought, but never mandate.
Define denial? Would it be mentioning the 12M or whatever non-Jews who were killed as a result of the Holocaust? Would it be arguing it was still a large amount of Jews killed but not the 6M figure we're given? What about comparing the treatment of Jews and the disabled, the Roma, or other ethnic or religious groups?
I wouldn't say there wasn't a Holocaust but "denial" can be anything
The numbers listed here just prompted a thought. Only tangentially related, but I guess it could be related in the sense of "what is holocaust denial's range?".
"Lest we forget" is the mantra, the motto, the refrain, right? But... Even in the most "accept it at face value" case, there's no way it was EXACTLY 6M. Over, under, around, give-or-take, depending-on-your-definitions, it's not going to be EXACTLY that. The reason we know it's 6 million is the Germans made lots of lists. Lists with names. Checklists. Instead of using those, we actively forget and round it off.
So... I can understand being off by a couple dozen in either direction, a few score, maybe a couple hundred due to runaways, or even a couple thousand due to lost paperwork... But why round it to just one significant digit?
It dehumanizes the dead. Coarse, wild rounding is meant for things like "grains of rice" or "beans in a can", not human lives. What is more personable, more impactful? "Six million died", or "Five million, nine hundred eighty seven thousand, nine hundred and thirty seven people"? The lower number, due to its specificity, carries more weight, more humanity within it. Numbers pulled from thin air here, since my whole complaint is we don't USE a proper number.
That could be denial, depending on their legal definitions, complaining of lack of a proper number... But it's just weird that we actively seek to forget by making it simple nice round numbers.
I have seen real, physical evidence of jews referencing the 6 million figure before WW2 even happend when talking about some sort of prophetic Jewish event. Can't recall the details honestly it's so tiresome.
Yeah. And you can use ground penetrating radar at any of those sites and find (surprise!) evidence of dead bodies buried under the ground.
Yet six million bodies disappeared with no evidence whatsoever, no graves ever found minus a small corner grave that any camp would have for the inevitable deaths that would occur.
Where's that big mass holocaust grave site that we can use radar to conclusively prove the Holocaust happened? Oh, right...
You don't need ground penetrating radar, the Allies marked and categorized all the mass graves as they dug out the camps. Watch "Night And Fog", almost all the footage is original recorded US Army footage or Soviet Footage from the camps themselves. The US Army footage records having to unbury the mass graves made by the Germans, then digging new mass graves to place them in layers of 500-1000 at a time.
Hell, the ash had it's own depository locations as well.
All of the camps had large mass graves. The Extermination camps, the Work camps, even the ghettos. Not to mention, that the early execution squads have all of their own mass graves as well. These are typically dug up, counted, categorized, and labeled by the host country as they are discovered. IIRC I think there's over 30 mass graves attributed to the Holocaust in Romania alone.
You really don't know anything about the Holocaust. You don't seem to know that it wasn't just the extermination camps. And you don't seem to know how prevalent the mass graves are all around Europe and all the camps.
Why don't you actually look for the work that's gone into the research rather than just asserting it doesn't exist if it isn't handed to you?
The best research that historians have done on Auschwitz includes train records, in addition to documentation and work cycles. The estimate seems to be a reliable 1.1 million total dead for the camp. Which, incidentally, is one of the lowest numbers (since holocaust deniers claim the numbers only go up), which is down from the 3-4 million that the Soviets alleged, and the 2 million that the Camp Commandant admitted to.
Doesn't sound so much like a holocaust as it was a country detaining what they considered the enemy until they could deport them to Israel after they won the war. It was a war camp, not a Sandals. It was also a war. Millions upon millions upon millions died.
Why is it then so fucking important and special that like a million Jews died? Who gives a shit and why has this been rammed down everyone's throats endlessly for decades?
This is the pushback. Jews aren't the special people they told themselves they are and their deaths mean as little as any other death. I'm not going to cry for dead Jews when there were just as many dead French, English, American, German, Japanese, etc. by the score. MORE PEOPLE DIED TO TRY AND SAVE THOSE MILLION DEAD SACRED KIKES THAN THEY WOULD HAVE SAVED ANYWAY.
And the Jew continues to attack the white man with their lies and slander and propaganda that never lets up. Evil. Next holocaust won't be made up because if it was an actual holocaust there wouldn't have been so many fucking survivors for the next 80 years to talk about it. Ever think of that, you simple fuck?
Doesn't sound so much like a holocaust as it was a country detaining what they considered the enemy until they could deport them to Israel after they won the war.
The sheer level of stupidity in this comment is amazing. This is as bad as the last guy who thought everyone who died in the Holocaust died at Auschwitz.
Israel didn't exist yet.
No Nazi documentation exists suggesting that they had any intention of simply moving all jews out of Germany, and certainly less than none exists of them accepting the creation of a Jewish state in British Palestine.
Next holocaust won't be made up because if it was an actual holocaust there wouldn't have been so many fucking survivors for the next 80 years to talk about it. Ever think of that, you simple fuck?
Yes, it's actually in the Wansee Conference notes. The industrial mechanism for Europe wide extermination of Jews was supposed to be able to exterminate closer to 24 million by 1945-1946. Luckily, they were only stopped at 6 for jews. Poland was the most heavily effected, and their jewish population was reduced by over 80% (around 3-3.5 million), leaving old jewish neighborhoods and communities effectively empty after jews had been ghettoized.
Those jews that did survive the war found in many cases all their property had long since been re-appropriated and handed over to ethnic Germans that were moved into their homes and communities. You might call it "Demographic Replacement". This lead to retaliatory violence across Europe by Jews, Checks, Slavs, Poles, and other European populations making reprisal attacks on ethnic Germans who had been moved into their repossessed lands, killing at least 100,000.
Shall I reverse the question onto you and ask you "if it was an ethnic cleansing of Germans, why are there so many ethnic Germans still in Poland?"
No, that would be incredibly ignorant, and I actually care about history so you aren't allowed to repeat it.
We're talking about literal millions of dead scattered across Europe. You can't get that specific of a number. You can't get that specific number of the amount of American servicemen killed in WW2.
The Germans didn't keep that many lists and weren't that level of autistic and detail, and they certainly didn't keep lists when they were just sending people to shoot 30-40 at a time.
This is the whole reason most calculations are kept to only a few significant digits, normally 3. Specification of 6 or 7 digits is nearly impossible along with error propagation, even when you're trying to be very careful about the numbers you're counting.
What we an assert is a range. Clearly under 15 (based on how you define what constitutes as an act within the Holocaust).
So they were so efficient they could build entire infrastructure in secret without documentation to eradicate 6 million Jews during wartime, but they were also sloppy and we can't trust their paperwork even though their efficiency is a literal national stereotype and a notable trait of the Third Reich's operations in general.
But we keep talking as if the Holohoax was real, which there would be a lot of evidence outside of "eyewitness accounts" (lotsa eye witnesses left.dor a HOLOCAUST, don't you think?) were it real. Which it wasn't. So fuck your law against speaking the truth about the holohoax.
You want the names and finger prints of each and every individual that was ever arrested, that's not going to happen because that's not how a bureaucracy works or maintains itself. That's called the concept of "resolution". You being ignorant is not a refutation of reality.
Then, of course, is the intentional destruction of documentation, and the intentional effort to keep most of executions relatively quiet and classified.
There is a lot of evidence outside of eyewitness accounts, including mass graves. You Socialists are all the fucking same. You are fundamentally ignorant of literally every aspect of the Holocaust. It's why I've actually had to explain to you morons before that there were 34 registered mass grave sites related to the Holocaust in just one Eastern European state. And why I had to explain that not all 6 million Jews were killed in Auschwitz. You literally don't know anything about it, because you don't care. You want to eradicate the bourgeoisie, you know it happened, you're glad it did, you'd do it again, you're just lying because you're hoping to attract a few useful idiots like a Tankie saying that Katyn was a Nazi atrocity.
It has nothing to do with numbers, it's about maintaining a narrative control.
The fact that Gina Corano (?) was accused of Holocaust Denial because she made a Nazi comparison, is exactly what these rules are for.
These people don't give a single solitary shit about the Holocaust, and wouldn't have a problem doing it again... especially since more than a few of them have Nazi ties anyway.
It's morally wrong to lie to defend the honour of evildoers. The Nazis bombed London in service of their aspirations towards global conquest - they do not deserve to have their crimes downplayed.
Bolshevik Jews killed millions in Russia during the 20th century. Is that not as important a Holocaust because the Jews were perpetrating it rather than suffering from it?
You mean Bolsheviks killed millions in the Russian Civil War.
You fucking idiot Nazis need to get your terms right, but I guess you can't since you, by definition, can't tell the difference between a Jew, a Bolshevik, a Mensheviks, a Soviet, and a Communist.
Here's what I don't understand. Why are you crying about being accused of something you support?
The Bolsheviks we're comprised of Jews, you semantic nitpick pilpul fuck. What a surprise, hiding behind another label and shrinking away from the Jew being called out. It was the Jews who comprised the Bolsheviks. Name the actual group, not their political party.
Bolsheviks, Mensheviks, and Communists all come in plenty of shapes sizes and colors. Look at America. We have White Communists and Black National Socialists working together in a Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in America.
The group is called: Leftist retards. Like yourself.
There's nothing wrong with denying something that never happened. The holofraud is as real as the deadlines of covid.
Oh sure, some people died from covid but was it 6 girrilion? And were the unvaccinated responsible for the deaths? Was there a reason fat people died that meant they should be accountable for their own death or do we blame everyone else in society?
You're no different from the idiot who posted that the Freedom Truckers should have their tires slashed because their terrorists. You pretend you're against what you openly demand to do, and pretend you wouldn't do it yourself while you advocate for it.
You want to kill people, you advocate for killing people, then you turn around and pretend than you'd never do such a thing because you're just so nice; and any idea that anyone who thinks exactly like you do would do the same thing is obviously just a crazy conspiracy theorist.
It's hardly a surprise National Socialists are Socialists. You think, act, and talk exactly like them, and then regurgitate the same strategies.
No, it's true. Look up Nazi policies. Nobody handed out more grants to women to start a family than the NSDAP. You are literal cuckolds voluntarily paying for someone else's kids.
He lost the war because his ideology was pathetic. He was a lunatic who believed Germans had a divine right to be better than everyone, installed because the German people would rather install a dictator than admit "their" woman didn't care about them.
They chose to be prostitutes rather than working, and Hitler took advantage of people's repulsion to it. That's why nobody talks about the Weimar Republic. It's a redpill suppository on the true nature of women.
Are you going to pay for their existence so they can spew hate towards you constantly? They should have to work, and should be cut off from any tax revenues not taken from other women.
Well, it's difficult not to talk about women when you're talking about the most deluded cult of fucking tradcucks in human history, who literally paid for women's houses for them.
Keep blaming the Jews for them treating you like shit. One day you'll work it out. You can go to the synagogue and apologize for being a retard.
Their work is catering to my needs, not partaking in the everyday workings of society. Their place is at home and that's it.
I don't want to come into work and have women work with me. They aren't my equal. They don't belong in the workplace. Every industry women work in they make worse. Every company women have a presence is worse for it. A woman's only value in society is to exist to please me at home and that's it. If she spews hatred against me then I'll beat her until she doesn't. If she keeps going, she's not a properly functioning object and she shall be discarded then. If she has no income and no one to care for her, she dies. Good riddance.
By letting women work and expecting that of them you are empowering women. Work gives her power because now she has value in the work she does and will use that to accumulate power. She will learn valuable skills and gain knowledge other people find useful and thus the woman now has power in the sense that they are a valuable labouror to another or for themselves even. The only skills and education a woman should have is how to please a man and make herself more attractive for a man. Outright banning women from work ensures women stay in their proper place in society which is barefoot, pregnant, in the kitchen or warming my bed.
I see a few problems with laws like this, beyond the obvious problem that it's an abhorent abrogation of free speech. And speech is already subject to too many restriction in Canada.
First, I look at it from the perspective that supporters of such a bill simply aren't interested in knowing the truth about the Holocaust. They like the version of history that's been settled on, which is coincidently the version written by the victors as it always is, and they don't want any uncomfortable questions or evidence to emerge that might undermine that perspective. Many groups have managed to extract power from the current understanding of the facts about the Holocaust, and have imposed a cowing guilt and extraction of recompense from others. Few ever give up power once they're grasped it.
Second, I see the possibility that many people truly believe that we've arrived at the true reckoning of the events surrounding WW2. Any further questions will only draw us away from the truth, and they believe questions about the Holocaust will only cause harm to innocent people today. It seems a naive perspective, but I can accept many people hold it.
Many liars have been exposed over the years claiming to have had horrifying experiences during WW2, like Joseph Hirt, who are simply taken at their word as they profit from their victimhood as prominent speakers only to admit to lying later in life. If it's illegal to deny aspects of the Holocaust, it's illegal to question the accounts of liars as long as they generally align with the accepted narrative, and it's made exceedingly difficult to expose these types of charlatans. The same can be said of governments. The legal truth just becomes a pack of lies clinging to the decaying husk of truth, and we'll have removed our ability to pare it down to what's actually real.
It's a bad law, as are virtually all laws that limit speech. Most people already accept that the Holocaust happened, that it was terrible, and would best be avoided in the future. Most disagreements surround the details, the figures and motivations of the groups involved. There's no harm in sharpening our understanding of the truth about that.
Besides which, I'll never be told by government what I'm allowed to say or think. I'm open to persuasion when it comes to speech and thought, but never mandate.
Define denial? Would it be mentioning the 12M or whatever non-Jews who were killed as a result of the Holocaust? Would it be arguing it was still a large amount of Jews killed but not the 6M figure we're given? What about comparing the treatment of Jews and the disabled, the Roma, or other ethnic or religious groups?
I wouldn't say there wasn't a Holocaust but "denial" can be anything
The numbers listed here just prompted a thought. Only tangentially related, but I guess it could be related in the sense of "what is holocaust denial's range?".
"Lest we forget" is the mantra, the motto, the refrain, right? But... Even in the most "accept it at face value" case, there's no way it was EXACTLY 6M. Over, under, around, give-or-take, depending-on-your-definitions, it's not going to be EXACTLY that. The reason we know it's 6 million is the Germans made lots of lists. Lists with names. Checklists. Instead of using those, we actively forget and round it off.
So... I can understand being off by a couple dozen in either direction, a few score, maybe a couple hundred due to runaways, or even a couple thousand due to lost paperwork... But why round it to just one significant digit?
It dehumanizes the dead. Coarse, wild rounding is meant for things like "grains of rice" or "beans in a can", not human lives. What is more personable, more impactful? "Six million died", or "Five million, nine hundred eighty seven thousand, nine hundred and thirty seven people"? The lower number, due to its specificity, carries more weight, more humanity within it. Numbers pulled from thin air here, since my whole complaint is we don't USE a proper number.
That could be denial, depending on their legal definitions, complaining of lack of a proper number... But it's just weird that we actively seek to forget by making it simple nice round numbers.
I've seen no evidence of 6 million.
I have seen real, physical evidence of jews referencing the 6 million figure before WW2 even happend when talking about some sort of prophetic Jewish event. Can't recall the details honestly it's so tiresome.
Have you tried going to Europe and seeing any of their mass graves?
I mean from any war. Europe's covered in them.
yes, which is exactly why i don't give a single fuck about the jews.
Yeah. And you can use ground penetrating radar at any of those sites and find (surprise!) evidence of dead bodies buried under the ground.
Yet six million bodies disappeared with no evidence whatsoever, no graves ever found minus a small corner grave that any camp would have for the inevitable deaths that would occur.
Where's that big mass holocaust grave site that we can use radar to conclusively prove the Holocaust happened? Oh, right...
You don't need ground penetrating radar, the Allies marked and categorized all the mass graves as they dug out the camps. Watch "Night And Fog", almost all the footage is original recorded US Army footage or Soviet Footage from the camps themselves. The US Army footage records having to unbury the mass graves made by the Germans, then digging new mass graves to place them in layers of 500-1000 at a time.
Hell, the ash had it's own depository locations as well.
All of the camps had large mass graves. The Extermination camps, the Work camps, even the ghettos. Not to mention, that the early execution squads have all of their own mass graves as well. These are typically dug up, counted, categorized, and labeled by the host country as they are discovered. IIRC I think there's over 30 mass graves attributed to the Holocaust in Romania alone.
You really don't know anything about the Holocaust. You don't seem to know that it wasn't just the extermination camps. And you don't seem to know how prevalent the mass graves are all around Europe and all the camps.
Uh, dude... that's not how "we know there was 6 million".
Find me this tally. Find me these death lists.
That is and always was a crock of shit.
I left Canada, so I'll call it bullshit because it is. Fuck the holohoax, and the Kaballistic spell it cast on my people.
Why don't you actually look for the work that's gone into the research rather than just asserting it doesn't exist if it isn't handed to you?
The best research that historians have done on Auschwitz includes train records, in addition to documentation and work cycles. The estimate seems to be a reliable 1.1 million total dead for the camp. Which, incidentally, is one of the lowest numbers (since holocaust deniers claim the numbers only go up), which is down from the 3-4 million that the Soviets alleged, and the 2 million that the Camp Commandant admitted to.
Doesn't sound so much like a holocaust as it was a country detaining what they considered the enemy until they could deport them to Israel after they won the war. It was a war camp, not a Sandals. It was also a war. Millions upon millions upon millions died.
Why is it then so fucking important and special that like a million Jews died? Who gives a shit and why has this been rammed down everyone's throats endlessly for decades?
This is the pushback. Jews aren't the special people they told themselves they are and their deaths mean as little as any other death. I'm not going to cry for dead Jews when there were just as many dead French, English, American, German, Japanese, etc. by the score. MORE PEOPLE DIED TO TRY AND SAVE THOSE MILLION DEAD SACRED KIKES THAN THEY WOULD HAVE SAVED ANYWAY.
And the Jew continues to attack the white man with their lies and slander and propaganda that never lets up. Evil. Next holocaust won't be made up because if it was an actual holocaust there wouldn't have been so many fucking survivors for the next 80 years to talk about it. Ever think of that, you simple fuck?
The sheer level of stupidity in this comment is amazing. This is as bad as the last guy who thought everyone who died in the Holocaust died at Auschwitz.
Israel didn't exist yet.
No Nazi documentation exists suggesting that they had any intention of simply moving all jews out of Germany, and certainly less than none exists of them accepting the creation of a Jewish state in British Palestine.
Yes, it's actually in the Wansee Conference notes. The industrial mechanism for Europe wide extermination of Jews was supposed to be able to exterminate closer to 24 million by 1945-1946. Luckily, they were only stopped at 6 for jews. Poland was the most heavily effected, and their jewish population was reduced by over 80% (around 3-3.5 million), leaving old jewish neighborhoods and communities effectively empty after jews had been ghettoized.
Those jews that did survive the war found in many cases all their property had long since been re-appropriated and handed over to ethnic Germans that were moved into their homes and communities. You might call it "Demographic Replacement". This lead to retaliatory violence across Europe by Jews, Checks, Slavs, Poles, and other European populations making reprisal attacks on ethnic Germans who had been moved into their repossessed lands, killing at least 100,000.
Shall I reverse the question onto you and ask you "if it was an ethnic cleansing of Germans, why are there so many ethnic Germans still in Poland?"
No, that would be incredibly ignorant, and I actually care about history so you aren't allowed to repeat it.
We're talking about literal millions of dead scattered across Europe. You can't get that specific of a number. You can't get that specific number of the amount of American servicemen killed in WW2.
The Germans didn't keep that many lists and weren't that level of autistic and detail, and they certainly didn't keep lists when they were just sending people to shoot 30-40 at a time.
This is the whole reason most calculations are kept to only a few significant digits, normally 3. Specification of 6 or 7 digits is nearly impossible along with error propagation, even when you're trying to be very careful about the numbers you're counting.
What we an assert is a range. Clearly under 15 (based on how you define what constitutes as an act within the Holocaust).
So they were so efficient they could build entire infrastructure in secret without documentation to eradicate 6 million Jews during wartime, but they were also sloppy and we can't trust their paperwork even though their efficiency is a literal national stereotype and a notable trait of the Third Reich's operations in general.
But we keep talking as if the Holohoax was real, which there would be a lot of evidence outside of "eyewitness accounts" (lotsa eye witnesses left.dor a HOLOCAUST, don't you think?) were it real. Which it wasn't. So fuck your law against speaking the truth about the holohoax.
No one said without documentation.
No one said that they were sloppy.
You want the names and finger prints of each and every individual that was ever arrested, that's not going to happen because that's not how a bureaucracy works or maintains itself. That's called the concept of "resolution". You being ignorant is not a refutation of reality.
Then, of course, is the intentional destruction of documentation, and the intentional effort to keep most of executions relatively quiet and classified.
There is a lot of evidence outside of eyewitness accounts, including mass graves. You Socialists are all the fucking same. You are fundamentally ignorant of literally every aspect of the Holocaust. It's why I've actually had to explain to you morons before that there were 34 registered mass grave sites related to the Holocaust in just one Eastern European state. And why I had to explain that not all 6 million Jews were killed in Auschwitz. You literally don't know anything about it, because you don't care. You want to eradicate the bourgeoisie, you know it happened, you're glad it did, you'd do it again, you're just lying because you're hoping to attract a few useful idiots like a Tankie saying that Katyn was a Nazi atrocity.
So no proof is proof. Got it. Also, shut up you fucking kike.
There's plenty of proof faggot. You're just not willing to accept evidence that contradicts your narrative. Like I said: you don't care.
aSsAuLt WeAp0nS
That's precisely the point, to be honest.
It has nothing to do with numbers, it's about maintaining a narrative control.
The fact that Gina Corano (?) was accused of Holocaust Denial because she made a Nazi comparison, is exactly what these rules are for.
These people don't give a single solitary shit about the Holocaust, and wouldn't have a problem doing it again... especially since more than a few of them have Nazi ties anyway.
Why?
(I assume he means "morally" vs. "factually" wrong. I'm not a "denier" but don't really care either way.)
It's morally wrong to lie to defend the honour of evildoers. The Nazis bombed London in service of their aspirations towards global conquest - they do not deserve to have their crimes downplayed.
why stop there?
let's ban ALL genocide denial, especially communist genocide denial. mao's cultural revolution, stalin's numerous extermination movements.
demand it's added to every single one of these holocaust denial bills.
watch those subverters squirm.
Bolshevik Jews killed millions in Russia during the 20th century. Is that not as important a Holocaust because the Jews were perpetrating it rather than suffering from it?
over the target!
You mean Bolsheviks killed millions in the Russian Civil War.
You fucking idiot Nazis need to get your terms right, but I guess you can't since you, by definition, can't tell the difference between a Jew, a Bolshevik, a Mensheviks, a Soviet, and a Communist.
Here's what I don't understand. Why are you crying about being accused of something you support?
The Bolsheviks we're comprised of Jews, you semantic nitpick pilpul fuck. What a surprise, hiding behind another label and shrinking away from the Jew being called out. It was the Jews who comprised the Bolsheviks. Name the actual group, not their political party.
That was mostly the Mensheviks, but good try.
Bolsheviks, Mensheviks, and Communists all come in plenty of shapes sizes and colors. Look at America. We have White Communists and Black National Socialists working together in a Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in America.
The group is called: Leftist retards. Like yourself.
There's nothing wrong with denying something that never happened. The holofraud is as real as the deadlines of covid.
Oh sure, some people died from covid but was it 6 girrilion? And were the unvaccinated responsible for the deaths? Was there a reason fat people died that meant they should be accountable for their own death or do we blame everyone else in society?
Holocaust is exactly the same.
Impy's right. You're a useless fucking joke.
You're no different from the idiot who posted that the Freedom Truckers should have their tires slashed because their terrorists. You pretend you're against what you openly demand to do, and pretend you wouldn't do it yourself while you advocate for it.
You want to kill people, you advocate for killing people, then you turn around and pretend than you'd never do such a thing because you're just so nice; and any idea that anyone who thinks exactly like you do would do the same thing is obviously just a crazy conspiracy theorist.
It's hardly a surprise National Socialists are Socialists. You think, act, and talk exactly like them, and then regurgitate the same strategies.
I don't pretend I am nice to my enemies.
The logic of a Nazi.
The Jews need to be killed, but Hitler didn't do it, but he should have.
You people are a bad joke.
Either stand by your beliefs or don't, but don't try to weasel out of what you support.
Name calling. You think that has any power any more?
That shit ended recently.
The 6 million figure is blatantly false... and it's easily disproven with even just minor rabbit hole diving.
Yeah, yeah, whatever. Keep supporting the largest wealth transfer to women in history.
Okay, now I know you're a poorly programmed bot.
No, it's true. Look up Nazi policies. Nobody handed out more grants to women to start a family than the NSDAP. You are literal cuckolds voluntarily paying for someone else's kids.
"Minor rabbit hole diving"
The Left can't meme. We already know: "wooden doors, roller coasters, swimming pools, lampshades, blah blah blah, we wuz nationalists and shieeeet."
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech (x2)
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
He lost the war because his ideology was pathetic. He was a lunatic who believed Germans had a divine right to be better than everyone, installed because the German people would rather install a dictator than admit "their" woman didn't care about them.
They chose to be prostitutes rather than working, and Hitler took advantage of people's repulsion to it. That's why nobody talks about the Weimar Republic. It's a redpill suppository on the true nature of women.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Are you going to pay for their existence so they can spew hate towards you constantly? They should have to work, and should be cut off from any tax revenues not taken from other women.
Well, it's difficult not to talk about women when you're talking about the most deluded cult of fucking tradcucks in human history, who literally paid for women's houses for them.
Keep blaming the Jews for them treating you like shit. One day you'll work it out. You can go to the synagogue and apologize for being a retard.
Their work is catering to my needs, not partaking in the everyday workings of society. Their place is at home and that's it.
I don't want to come into work and have women work with me. They aren't my equal. They don't belong in the workplace. Every industry women work in they make worse. Every company women have a presence is worse for it. A woman's only value in society is to exist to please me at home and that's it. If she spews hatred against me then I'll beat her until she doesn't. If she keeps going, she's not a properly functioning object and she shall be discarded then. If she has no income and no one to care for her, she dies. Good riddance.
By letting women work and expecting that of them you are empowering women. Work gives her power because now she has value in the work she does and will use that to accumulate power. She will learn valuable skills and gain knowledge other people find useful and thus the woman now has power in the sense that they are a valuable labouror to another or for themselves even. The only skills and education a woman should have is how to please a man and make herself more attractive for a man. Outright banning women from work ensures women stay in their proper place in society which is barefoot, pregnant, in the kitchen or warming my bed.
Get your head out of the 1950s, they don't care about you.
Imagine an event so true, it has to be illegal to discuss it...
cOnSeRvAtIvE
Oh Canada, you'll always be run by retards at this rate.
I didn't take you for a stormcuck, YesMovement.
Opposing restrictions on free speech is not a "stormcuck" cause.
All woman worshipping ideologies deserve to be fucking censored. Them and the feminists, two sides of the same shit covered coin.
Is that why you people report everything I say for Rule 16, you fucking hypocrite?