I wonder what the real reason he's quitting is. Probably something to do with children, at the worst. At best, this colleague he had relations with was underage or something as an intern for CNN when the relationship started.
Welp, the lady in question is easily over 45 so that wouldn't be it. Looks like she worked for Andrew Cuomo, so obviously corruption is the main reason Zuck zuck is stepping down. Funny how she's still got her job though.
Other way around - women in the workplace are almost entirely to blame for declining marriage and birth rates.
For some people that's not an easy thing to admit or acknowledge. It doesn't mean that the small percentage of women with more male brains who want to work and actually pull their weight should be absolutely barred from achieving whatever they can achieve... but most women would be happier and more fulfilled raising families.
Who wants to marry and have children with a woman who works? You think I'm going to drive kids to school, make kids lunches, pickup the kids from daycare, cook dinner, keep the house clean and then listen to a woman complain about Chad at work before being told she's too tired and stressed to have sex with me? Lmao. The problem isn't a ban on relationships in the workplace, the problem is women working.
Yes I agree. Now deflate the currency and make it possible for people to raise a family of 5 again with one man's income. Until that happens women are going to be in the workplace
It's actually very possible on one income. Buy a small house that isn't made of the newest materials in an okay area. Have the woman cook all meals from scratch. No eating out. No alcohol purchases. Woman buys basic clothes. Man buys bare minimum for clothes. No Netflix, no Amazon Prime, none of that garbage. 1 Used vehicle.
No vacations. Done.
What you really need to do is lower taxes. With women at home to home school why are you financing public education? Cut income taxes down by abolishing public education and it becomes even more feasible to raise a family on one income.
The problem is that most people think they should be going on 3 vacations a year, newest Mercedes, fancy house, restaurants and lounges everyday etc... You don't need any of that and your grandparents in the 50s didn't have that either.
So you're saying no one on this planet has ever lived because they didn't have tons of material possessions? That's a young person's view. Living isn't about material things. That's why society is so fucked right now. The consumerist culture has taken people away from what is important to living (healthy relationships) and instead made people thing consuming to make corporations money is "living". It's not. What I described is in fact living is you have a loving wife and children. That's living. Not having a bunch of fancy material possessions but miserably unhappy while in denial about it with your 3 cats that you try to use for a substitute for human interaction.
Women, by and large, make terrible leaders. Easy to control, and always able to manipulate biological instincts to put a "friendly face" on crises.
If the Biden "administration" is any indicator, this is the new strategy of the globalists - the leaders are just scapegoats and PR figures for the people who really do the work.
I imagine this is especially true in NY state after Cuomo.
From personal experience every female boss I've had has been absolute shit more worried about how things look than how they are. They'll keep shining a turd as long as it takes to keep from accountability.
LOL I used to teach in Korea and I had this batshit insane woman one year... she was a total incompetent fuckup but one instance is still indelible in my hippocampus
Morning meeting: "Hey, when we have foreign teachers in rooms at the end of the day, make sure you're not finishing too early. Parents watch on CCTV and want to see a full class time"
My class, at the end of the day, is interrupted by her with 10 minutes left to yell at me about not having the kids ready. I'm confused but stop what I'm doing and get them ready to leave.
She then realizes her clock was fast or broken and they had 5 minutes left and tried to tell me to get the kids out of their coats and backpacks and go teach them for 5 more minutes.
I wonder what the real reason he's quitting is. Probably something to do with children, at the worst. At best, this colleague he had relations with was underage or something as an intern for CNN when the relationship started.
Welp, the lady in question is easily over 45 so that wouldn't be it. Looks like she worked for Andrew Cuomo, so obviously corruption is the main reason Zuck zuck is stepping down. Funny how she's still got her job though.
She seems like the beard in this story.
I feel like the implicit total ban on relationships in the workplace is at least partly to blame for declining marriage and birth rates
Other way around - women in the workplace are almost entirely to blame for declining marriage and birth rates.
For some people that's not an easy thing to admit or acknowledge. It doesn't mean that the small percentage of women with more male brains who want to work and actually pull their weight should be absolutely barred from achieving whatever they can achieve... but most women would be happier and more fulfilled raising families.
Who wants to marry and have children with a woman who works? You think I'm going to drive kids to school, make kids lunches, pickup the kids from daycare, cook dinner, keep the house clean and then listen to a woman complain about Chad at work before being told she's too tired and stressed to have sex with me? Lmao. The problem isn't a ban on relationships in the workplace, the problem is women working.
A lot of times especially in the past the woman would quit her job to raise a family when she got married.
it happens a lot today
As it should be but in reality, they shouldn't even be working. They should live at home until they marry.
Yes I agree. Now deflate the currency and make it possible for people to raise a family of 5 again with one man's income. Until that happens women are going to be in the workplace
It's actually very possible on one income. Buy a small house that isn't made of the newest materials in an okay area. Have the woman cook all meals from scratch. No eating out. No alcohol purchases. Woman buys basic clothes. Man buys bare minimum for clothes. No Netflix, no Amazon Prime, none of that garbage. 1 Used vehicle. No vacations. Done.
What you really need to do is lower taxes. With women at home to home school why are you financing public education? Cut income taxes down by abolishing public education and it becomes even more feasible to raise a family on one income.
The problem is that most people think they should be going on 3 vacations a year, newest Mercedes, fancy house, restaurants and lounges everyday etc... You don't need any of that and your grandparents in the 50s didn't have that either.
Possible != practical. Sounds like living without really living
So you're saying no one on this planet has ever lived because they didn't have tons of material possessions? That's a young person's view. Living isn't about material things. That's why society is so fucked right now. The consumerist culture has taken people away from what is important to living (healthy relationships) and instead made people thing consuming to make corporations money is "living". It's not. What I described is in fact living is you have a loving wife and children. That's living. Not having a bunch of fancy material possessions but miserably unhappy while in denial about it with your 3 cats that you try to use for a substitute for human interaction.
My parents for one. They met at work. Stopped working the same job before they got married though.
And I only said it's part of the reason, of course there are many other components
Go right ahead
It's better for disease carrying pests to die than for them to escape and spread to other places
PERVERT ALERT!
… and a few young boys.
According to Beanie Man, the so-called colleague is an ex-Cuomo aide as well. So more coming out of those scum probably.
Women, by and large, make terrible leaders. Easy to control, and always able to manipulate biological instincts to put a "friendly face" on crises.
If the Biden "administration" is any indicator, this is the new strategy of the globalists - the leaders are just scapegoats and PR figures for the people who really do the work.
I imagine this is especially true in NY state after Cuomo.
From personal experience every female boss I've had has been absolute shit more worried about how things look than how they are. They'll keep shining a turd as long as it takes to keep from accountability.
LOL I used to teach in Korea and I had this batshit insane woman one year... she was a total incompetent fuckup but one instance is still indelible in my hippocampus
Morning meeting: "Hey, when we have foreign teachers in rooms at the end of the day, make sure you're not finishing too early. Parents watch on CCTV and want to see a full class time"
My class, at the end of the day, is interrupted by her with 10 minutes left to yell at me about not having the kids ready. I'm confused but stop what I'm doing and get them ready to leave.
She then realizes her clock was fast or broken and they had 5 minutes left and tried to tell me to get the kids out of their coats and backpacks and go teach them for 5 more minutes.
Batshit insane micromanagement.