Doubt. Although I do concur that some amount of exploiting the population for billions of dollars is certainly going on.
However, the facts are out. This was a power grab to drive the Great Reset to gain Europe's old money stronger control over all Western governments. They are going to wipe out your wealth, your savings, your investments. They are going to move you into pods and feed you industrial waste. They are going to remove all of your ability to exercise your free will: remove your freedom.
This info was weeks old even before 'Joe Rogan Got Annihilated' for saying the same thing. The only widespread news about it was unsentient zoomers and libshit women sharing links of this Australian cunt asserting the very opposite, on Rogan's show. Not even Rogan knew the link to the Nature paper and merely allowed himself to get bamboozled, which would beg some questions about wtf he's playing at if I didn't already know how retarded he is. The cattlebrained fleshlumps that comprise most of this species have already filed this news under 'Do Not Absorb Under Any Circumstances', as per tribal mandate.
Facts are finished with. I stopped saving most info to my vaccine news folder months ago. Act appropriately.
If the authors separate men 16-24 from 12-15 and 25-40, it would likely look worst in 16-24 age group.
But it's worse than that. They should have broken down the heart problems in infected by vaccinated and unvaccinated.
They did say that previous infection didn't cause the vaccine to be worse on the heart, but they didn't test whether the vaccine caused the infection to be worse. With two things that damage the heart how could they not magnify each other? It seems like some people should have gotten mild heart damage from the infection that turned mild damage from vaccine into serious problems. There should be some pile on effect from having both if they're both causing a range of damage.
One possibility is that the infection heart problems were caused by the vaccine, but simply went undetected until stress from the covid. In that case infection wouldn't magnify the vaccine risk, and that's consistent with what they found in this research.
They deliberately used certain ingredients that would provoke this.
Which ingredients are those?
Unless someone can prove this wrong, this obscure investor report on Novavax is the smoking gun on the other companies.
A company's marketing claims shouldn't exactly be taken on face value. Besides, Novavax claims that this use is not 'traditional' in vaccines. So vaccines have always been a plot to kill you?
Well, you claimed to know not just about 'certain ingredients', but also that they 'deliberately' used them.
So that comment of yours was BS?
That's why I said unless it can be proven wrong. It sounds plausible
That's not how the burden of proof works. Novavax is supposed to prove its claims. And frankly, if I had to choose between Novavax and Pfizer, I'd choose the latter at this moment - because it's had 1+ years of massive use, while the same is not true for Novavax.
it gives a way for the deliberate engineering to cause myocarditis to be possible
Even if Novavax's claims are correct, which they may be, it refutes that claim of yours. Because Novavax is claiming an innovation - it changed the vaccine from the way they are normally made, not Pfizer. So how did Pfizer 'deliberately engineer' it to kill you?
Lick. The. Fucking. BOOT!
Power. They want everyone to take the shot, they don't care if it works or not. You will OBEY!
I’ll just lay out the facts to why.
Trump gave prefunded carte Blanche for the “vaccines”. Bureaucracy used this to profit their agenda.
Media has spun “vax or die”.
This keeps bureaucracy active for the next generations. Create the problem and sell the “solution”
Profit
Doubt. Although I do concur that some amount of exploiting the population for billions of dollars is certainly going on.
However, the facts are out. This was a power grab to drive the Great Reset to gain Europe's old money stronger control over all Western governments. They are going to wipe out your wealth, your savings, your investments. They are going to move you into pods and feed you industrial waste. They are going to remove all of your ability to exercise your free will: remove your freedom.
Intentionally trying to reduce the male population?
Because money. It's all about money.
When it falls apart the narrative of 'eberyone needs vacc to stop the pandemic' ends, and the whole contrived scheme falls apart.
Thats why they will never admit it... for as long as the populace allows them to..
This info was weeks old even before 'Joe Rogan Got Annihilated' for saying the same thing. The only widespread news about it was unsentient zoomers and libshit women sharing links of this Australian cunt asserting the very opposite, on Rogan's show. Not even Rogan knew the link to the Nature paper and merely allowed himself to get bamboozled, which would beg some questions about wtf he's playing at if I didn't already know how retarded he is. The cattlebrained fleshlumps that comprise most of this species have already filed this news under 'Do Not Absorb Under Any Circumstances', as per tribal mandate.
Facts are finished with. I stopped saving most info to my vaccine news folder months ago. Act appropriately.
Won't get your penis cut off huh? Well, here, have a heart attack.
But it's worse than that. They should have broken down the heart problems in infected by vaccinated and unvaccinated.
They did say that previous infection didn't cause the vaccine to be worse on the heart, but they didn't test whether the vaccine caused the infection to be worse. With two things that damage the heart how could they not magnify each other? It seems like some people should have gotten mild heart damage from the infection that turned mild damage from vaccine into serious problems. There should be some pile on effect from having both if they're both causing a range of damage.
One possibility is that the infection heart problems were caused by the vaccine, but simply went undetected until stress from the covid. In that case infection wouldn't magnify the vaccine risk, and that's consistent with what they found in this research.
It's so the left can create a new disability group of men with weak hearts weaker than women in wheelchairs to be another voting wing.
Which ingredients are those?
A company's marketing claims shouldn't exactly be taken on face value. Besides, Novavax claims that this use is not 'traditional' in vaccines. So vaccines have always been a plot to kill you?
Well, you claimed to know not just about 'certain ingredients', but also that they 'deliberately' used them.
So that comment of yours was BS?
That's not how the burden of proof works. Novavax is supposed to prove its claims. And frankly, if I had to choose between Novavax and Pfizer, I'd choose the latter at this moment - because it's had 1+ years of massive use, while the same is not true for Novavax.
Even if Novavax's claims are correct, which they may be, it refutes that claim of yours. Because Novavax is claiming an innovation - it changed the vaccine from the way they are normally made, not Pfizer. So how did Pfizer 'deliberately engineer' it to kill you?