Well, you claimed to know not just about 'certain ingredients', but also that they 'deliberately' used them.
So that comment of yours was BS?
That's why I said unless it can be proven wrong. It sounds plausible
That's not how the burden of proof works. Novavax is supposed to prove its claims. And frankly, if I had to choose between Novavax and Pfizer, I'd choose the latter at this moment - because it's had 1+ years of massive use, while the same is not true for Novavax.
it gives a way for the deliberate engineering to cause myocarditis to be possible
Even if Novavax's claims are correct, which they may be, it refutes that claim of yours. Because Novavax is claiming an innovation - it changed the vaccine from the way they are normally made, not Pfizer. So how did Pfizer 'deliberately engineer' it to kill you?
Well, you claimed to know not just about 'certain ingredients', but also that they 'deliberately' used them.
So that comment of yours was BS?
That's not how the burden of proof works. Novavax is supposed to prove its claims. And frankly, if I had to choose between Novavax and Pfizer, I'd choose the latter at this moment - because it's had 1+ years of massive use, while the same is not true for Novavax.
Even if Novavax's claims are correct, which they may be, it refutes that claim of yours. Because Novavax is claiming an innovation - it changed the vaccine from the way they are normally made, not Pfizer. So how did Pfizer 'deliberately engineer' it to kill you?