In 2018 she worked with Nature and Estée Lauder Companies to launch a global award for women in science. She became the first ever woman editor-in-chief of Nature in its 150-year history in May 2018.
They seem to get these positions just before they need them, I swear. A year to gain credibility then bury the truth for the agenda.
If the truth came out about how skewed the rate is - the figures for the vaccine would start to look deliberate.
They need to pretend that the virus causes it, because they need to hide the truth. They deliberately used certain ingredients that would provoke this.
The FDA and CDC know exactly what happened - the resignations were people who couldn't stand what they knew.
The genius behind the Novavax vaccine is not so much in its traditional use of a viral protein subunit but in its use of a saponin adjuvant. Saponins provoke an immune response, but through anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, prevent an over-inflammatory response. In doing so, this phytochemical likely eliminates or greatly reduces the chances of either myocarditis or immune thrombocytopenia (blood clotting).
Unless someone can prove this wrong, this obscure investor report on Novavax is the smoking gun on the other companies.
Why under 5s
MRNA needs a catalyst to rise for the short squeeze attempt. Too many wrongthinkers have jumped on the train to kill this company and the remaining holders will try a mass buy to margin call everyone who bought in up to $210.
Think GME, but backed by the likes of Citigroup and Bank of America.
They deliberately used certain ingredients that would provoke this.
Which ingredients are those?
Unless someone can prove this wrong, this obscure investor report on Novavax is the smoking gun on the other companies.
A company's marketing claims shouldn't exactly be taken on face value. Besides, Novavax claims that this use is not 'traditional' in vaccines. So vaccines have always been a plot to kill you?
That's why I said unless it can be proven wrong. It sounds plausible, it gives a way for the deliberate engineering to cause myocarditis to be possible. It ties up everything else I've said neatly.
Well, you claimed to know not just about 'certain ingredients', but also that they 'deliberately' used them.
So that comment of yours was BS?
That's why I said unless it can be proven wrong. It sounds plausible
That's not how the burden of proof works. Novavax is supposed to prove its claims. And frankly, if I had to choose between Novavax and Pfizer, I'd choose the latter at this moment - because it's had 1+ years of massive use, while the same is not true for Novavax.
it gives a way for the deliberate engineering to cause myocarditis to be possible
Even if Novavax's claims are correct, which they may be, it refutes that claim of yours. Because Novavax is claiming an innovation - it changed the vaccine from the way they are normally made, not Pfizer. So how did Pfizer 'deliberately engineer' it to kill you?
There's a reason they didn't use the correct figure for SARS-Cov2
They seem to get these positions just before they need them, I swear. A year to gain credibility then bury the truth for the agenda.
If the truth came out about how skewed the rate is - the figures for the vaccine would start to look deliberate.
They need to pretend that the virus causes it, because they need to hide the truth. They deliberately used certain ingredients that would provoke this.
The FDA and CDC know exactly what happened - the resignations were people who couldn't stand what they knew.
https://archive.is/mvuMj
Unless someone can prove this wrong, this obscure investor report on Novavax is the smoking gun on the other companies.
MRNA needs a catalyst to rise for the short squeeze attempt. Too many wrongthinkers have jumped on the train to kill this company and the remaining holders will try a mass buy to margin call everyone who bought in up to $210.
Think GME, but backed by the likes of Citigroup and Bank of America.
Which ingredients are those?
A company's marketing claims shouldn't exactly be taken on face value. Besides, Novavax claims that this use is not 'traditional' in vaccines. So vaccines have always been a plot to kill you?
Do I look like I work for Pfizer?
That's why I said unless it can be proven wrong. It sounds plausible, it gives a way for the deliberate engineering to cause myocarditis to be possible. It ties up everything else I've said neatly.
Well, you claimed to know not just about 'certain ingredients', but also that they 'deliberately' used them.
So that comment of yours was BS?
That's not how the burden of proof works. Novavax is supposed to prove its claims. And frankly, if I had to choose between Novavax and Pfizer, I'd choose the latter at this moment - because it's had 1+ years of massive use, while the same is not true for Novavax.
Even if Novavax's claims are correct, which they may be, it refutes that claim of yours. Because Novavax is claiming an innovation - it changed the vaccine from the way they are normally made, not Pfizer. So how did Pfizer 'deliberately engineer' it to kill you?