Recently I saw the criticism of "you guys call anything with a female or minority woke", and I foolishly engaged this person in an argument. This person was in their late teens (yes I know it was stupid to bother but I thought I could make him see he was wrong). He just stopped responding to me when I pointed out that there are plenty of female/minority characters that were liked across the board but now we live in a time where we are told that we have to like garbage movies or shows or we are bad poeple.
Honestly to me Woke means endless race/gender swaps, overhyping something because it was written or directed by a female/minority, and the ridiculous overrepresentation of lgbt.
My question is, is it even worth trying to fight against all this or just do like I do and mainly watch or read stuff from 2014 and prior? I follow certain youtubers and if they recommend a new show I'll check it out, but I do wonder what purpose it serves to go after DC, Disney, Star Trek, etc since they have shown that they hate us. One of my favorite nerd rants last year was when Eric July was pissed about the lady who was in charge of the Scarlet Witch show because she said she never read comic books and didn't know who Mephisto was. Stuff like this just pisses me off because if we suggest that maybe she do some research into the lore behind her show we are sexists.
So is it worth it to keep fighting?
And most of us don’t have that level of energy
Consider that form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents the power of resistance (form) within the power of velocity (flow), and that the balance of flow/from represents EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
Question if the parasitic few trick the many to ignore resistance towards velocity (struggle to survive) for suggested progressivism aka consenting to go with the flow by wanting outcomes; seeking goals; aiming for achievements; putting hope towards etc.
What if temporary resisting form within ongoing velocity of flow represents growth potential within loss of potentiality, and what if the many ignore growth through resistance; then the few can farm the ignored potential of energy?
So those who do resist and go against the flow to improve themselves have a higher chance of progress than those who try to stay within flow?
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...one a) exists temporarily within the momentum of ongoing flow; b) form within the momentum of flow implies temporary choice (free will) in response to ongoing balance (need/want), and therefore c) resistance (form) to velocity (flow) doesn't represent against (imbalance); but for the sustenance of self (as choice responding to balance).
The deception one falls for is suggested progressivism aka choosing to "want" to go with the flow towards outcomes; achievements; goals; hopes etc. aka suggested growth in return for following along. What one ignores is that the choice used to consent to suggested information (want or not want); represents the response ability of form (life) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death); hence the choice based response to balance (need/want).
In short...one cannot choose want vs not want (imbalance) without first responding as choice to need or want (balance). Want or not want (towards suggested information) implies the ignorance of need for want (perceived inspiration).
Life is not outcome oriented (inception predefines death; which allows life in-between)...life is balance oriented aka the temporary growth potential (form) within ongoing loss of potentiality (flow) aka magnetic resistance within electric velocity of energy. The parasitic few harvest the ignored potential of the many by suggesting them to not utilize it; to choose ignorance (want) over adherence (need) to self sustenance.
Is the surfer (resistance) in conflict with the water (velocity) or is he balancing within momentum (wave) towards predefined outcome (beach)? Flow represents the ongoing natural order for the temporary formed chaos within. The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many to a) ignore resisting the natural order to instead follow suggested orders, and b) they suggest seeking order out of chaos; which represents the inversion of one representing chaos (form) out of order (flow).
All conflicts (want vs not want) in this system are based on those within choosing to ignore to balance (need over want) by choice; and the parasitic few who exploit this ignorance are branding these conflicts "reason"; rebrand both sides within reason at will (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs evil; believer vs non-believer; right vs left; capitalism vs communism; Coke vs Pepsi; pro-life vs pro-choice; hetero vs homo; Christianity vs Islam; patriarchy vs feminism; white vs black and so on), and suggest contradictions to both sides to keep them within perpetual conflict (talmudic reasoning).
ONEself needs to respond as choice to balance of ALL perceived; while struggling to resist the temptation of what other ONEs are suggesting. Choice responding to perceived balance represents resonance; choice responding to suggested choices represents dissonance. So either ONE resonates with ALL (balance) or ONE ignores this (imbalance) aka need or want, and choosing want over need will cause the want vs not want conflicts (reason).
Choosing need over want grows the seed of ONE within the soil of ALL; hence causing the fruits of ONEs labors; which attract others (a need based hierarchy); while choosing want over need (temptation) causes a corruption base hierarchy aka want tempting more wants; while corrupting others as-well, like greed tempting envy, or ignorance of the many tempting insolence among the few.
But if I swim out into the ocean, and duck below every wave, I am still heading to the beach in this comparison. I am not going against the flow, I am using it to my advantage.
A wave is only powerful in a specific area, if I duck below it, and emerge from the other side wet but untouched. Much as the majority of the USA population is non voters who ignore DC for the most part.
That implies wanting the beach as the outcome; which inspires the question as to why did you swim out in the first place? Just to get back? Nah, implies balancing within the moment(um) of motion.
Change the perspective of the scenario to form (life) within the momentum (balance ) of flow (inception towards death). You are already "surfing" as life; why would you go with the flow to reach death quicker instead of resisting for the sustenance of life? The advantage of life implies temporarily existing as form with access to everything offered by flow aka being ONEs evaluation (choice) within of ALL value (balance). Evaluation represents the highest value in existence. If you suggest me the highest value you perceive; I can choose "meh" to devalue it for myself.
Which I used as an allegory for the only specific area where form can exist within flow aka the ever changing moment(um) of motion aka the balance causing ones responding free will of choice.
a) the few who suggest the many to vote for representative government (from govern/to control + ment; form mens/mind) are also the ones who suggest the brand of nations (USA); while the many ignore that United implies U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness."...not togetherness under a consented to idol (USA). Each of us represents the ONE state (form) within ALL (flow), hence nation representing "a people" aka each of them; not the representatives of them using brands and flags as idols to steer them.
b) to ignore implies the choice of want over need; in this case not wanting vs wanting suggested voting. This still represents consent to suggested; causing division (want vs not want aka reasoning) among those consenting; hence the rebranding of want vs not want into republican vs democrat. It's still the same population control by means of suggestion.
c) "for the most part" is where the perceived inspiration operates; because it implies individual ONEs sustaining themselves; while resisting the suggestions of others. This is where the momentum can be utilized for growth by resisting the temptation to go against the suggested beast system (society), and instead struggle to adhere to real system (natural law aka flow to form).
The more do this; the less potency the suggestions of our parasitic ankle-biters have; yet the majority still ignores the source for the parasitic behavior of the few...it represents the response to the ignorance of the many towards perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information) aka ones choice of want over need; instead of need over want. All aspects of society are being suggested to deceive the majority from comprehending the free will of choice and the consequences thereof.
When I say I am headed to the beach, even if I swim out far, I end up back at the beach when finished. Mind you it could be a different beach at first. Just a longer route back to where my stuff is.
huh, this guy's still around
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) each differentiated ONE shares the same path within ALL, and ALL is ONE in energy anyway; so where else than within momentum (balance) could I (choice) be?
As for "around"...it implies a "Dead Or Alive" situation. If one is moved from inception towards death (one direction); then moving around represents the temptation to ignore this or in other words...
"All I know is that to me" - aka ALL that ONE perceives
"You look like you're lots of fun" - aka all others are tempting
"Open up your lovin' arms" - aka suggestion and assumption towards others
"I want some, want some" - choice to ignore need for want causing corruption of temptation.
And then it goes..."You spin me right 'round, baby"..."Right 'round like a record, baby"..."Right 'round, 'round, 'round" - aka falling for the self imposed ego within ones conscious memory aka RECORD', verb transitive [Latin recorder, to call to mind, to remember].
A sleight of hand for all with eyes to see; while simultaneously cultural subversion for the ignorant... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGNiXGX2nLU
Comment Reported for:
There's really nothing I can do about this unless it gets totally out of control
Today we learned that when "free-will-of-choice" is used to respond to "questions for everyone"; then "schizophrenia" accusations will be used in an attempt to shut it down. Fascinating.
Uhh...they spent the last 50 years working towards this.
Only for certain values of 'they.'
Consider the suggestion of corruption as utilization of FRE'QUENCY, noun - "a return or occurrence of a thing often repeated at short intervals" used against form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka resistance (form) to velocity (flow)?
Don't you have a wood statue to burn?
That would represent an EF'FIGY, noun [Latin effigies, from effingo, to fashion; ex and fingo, to form or devise.] - "the image or likeness of a person"; which implies the suggested ignorance of Person aka per sonos aka by sound...hence already formed out of sound.
In short...everything suggested (information) represents idolatry of everything perceived (inspiration).
Get back on your meds. Everything was much nicer without your polluting the threads.
MED'ICINE, noun [Latin medicina, from medeor, to cure.] + CURE, noun [Latin , to cure to take care, to prepare.]...how does choice balancing within an ongoing momentum prepare itself for wanted outcomes; when in need of constant adaptation?
Question for everyone leading to response by ONE within ALL causing another one to feel POLLU'TED, participle passive - "defiled; rendered unclean; tainted with guilt; impaired; profaned".
Babe; are you trying to pull a #metoo on me? How about taking a bath instead?
Consider the following..."You know it seems the more we talk about it"..."It only makes it worse to live without it"..."But lets talk about it"..."Wouldn't it be nice?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lD4sxxoJGkA
Get a new hobby.
What are you trying to lure me into here? https://pic8.co/sh/B6uycb.jpg
Fight it by disengaging. Never give them money. If it comes up in conversation, be derisive and disgusted: "[Product]? I don't watch retarded/faggy things."
The energy-consuming part is convincing people it's bad. Don't. You can't. They're possessed. If you try, you give them material to play "six degrees of fascist" and they'll write you off anyway. Like Johnny Appleseed, drop a seed of doubt and walk away. Effortless.
This.
It literally is just this.
A lot of my (our?) favorite content from the old times had plenty of even-handed and charitable handling of various racial and gender minorities that I would not have blinked at. They still hold up and I can go back and rewatch them without feeling insulted or pandered to.
The blight is making people MORE racist, and by design.
I honestly feel this is being done on purpose. For instance can you remember a recent female/minority writer or director who talks about being a fan of the show they are working on? It seems like every one can’t shut up about racism or sexism. I’m like just give me a good story. I have books from the past by women and minorities. I don’t care. Give me a good story
It is obviously done on purpose.
If their goal was to present an awesome product, they would go "here, look, an awesome product!". You can see it in many fast food commercials: Burger, burger slow-mo, burger, price point, company name, burger, end. (Or pizza, or whatever).
But their selling feature, the reason the product was made, is not because it is a good product or made to sell. The reason they highlight is that it harms in some way some racial or gender group. That is the selling feature, that is why it was made, and they don't hide it.
Mari Shimazaki is a name of a woman you don't recognize, because she made a good product, instead of harping about how it hurt people of specific sexes or races. For reference, she was the artist/designer behind Bayonetta. Her goal was to make a good product, and she did.
Their goal is not to make a good product. Simple as that.
Good point. I had Bayonetta and enjoyed it
At this point I want to suggest leaning into and just say "Yes."
Build a good game with the white man as the unequivocal hero. The woke crowd is incapable of doing this. They are not good at their craft and should thus be scorned and anything that bears their hallmarks should be scorned as if it comes from their hand.
Funny, and it does save you time and energy.
I’d love to see someone’s face after accusing me of being racist when they hear the response: “and?”
Good point
I really other bother with close family and friends that share interests with me and I think might actually listen. So with those qualifiers we're talking about no more than 4 or 5 people total split between adults that lean right anyway and teenage family that I have rapport with and want to encourage to use their own brains. Otherwise, not really.
I’ve reached that point as well. Most of my close friends are from church or some friends I’ve known since childhood. My immediate family leans right but most of my extended is left. I love them and all but don’t talk to them much.
Yes, speak up or against it. But sometimes it just seems pointless and I go and watch Little House on the Prairie
Minimum standards in entertainment are not something you can browbeat into people and there's nothing you can do about how propagandised and shitty all western entertainment has become, other than not give it any money or attention. The furthest I'll go with people is to be vocally scathing of any wokeshit show I've been duped into trying in the past few years, although examples of those are getting scarcer since I've just given up trying anything new. It's all shit.
The western world is too dependent on America for its entertainment (as well as all its political cues), so until America sorts out the intersectional feminist psychosis it's been riddled with for the past decade, you will have to dredge the archives for older media to enjoy. But there's plenty there.
You may have stumbled onto a trick. They are using the generation gap to trick kids into it. They think they are belling and fighting the man, by doing exactly what Poochie tells them to do.
I noticed something recently. I think they tend to go crazy out of a desire for self-preservation.
Like Kathleen Kennedy is obviously incompetent right? The only thing she has going for her is that she’s a woman, and that’s how she got her position. So her natural inclination is to push “girl power” as hard as possible. It’s working for her so far, and it’s all she’s got, so why not?
I think a failing film would only make her double down and go more diverse.
As another example, look at Boyega. I’m not even saying he’s a bad actor, I’ve just never heard of him before the Star Wars films, and since then, he’s done nothing but talk about how black people aren’t fairly represented in film lol.
That’s his thing now. Instead of appreciating that he got to be in one of the best franchises ever created, he whines that he wasn’t the lead. He will now complain his way to the top, and people will comply out of either fear or because they agree with him politically.
It’s this totally self-serving, disgusting movement of weakness and mediocrity. I used to think it was purely this agenda to take down and destroy what already functions well, or to destroy white people, but it’s more about uplifting mediocrity and deflecting criticism.
I’m just going to tune them out. I started watching Book of Boba Fett recently and it’s not bad. Not amazing, but it has potential. The main actor is flawless, but I have some issues with the story/production. It’s leagues better than most of what’s out there though.
Filoni and Favreau are keeping the franchise alive for a bit longer. It’s more and more difficult to enjoy what content is put out there, but I’m pretty busy these days anyway.
I honestly felt bad for Boyega because I felt his character could’ve been written much better but he lost me once he jumped on the oppression train.
I haven’t seen boba Fett yet but will probably get the dvd one day. Yea Filoni and Favreau don’t hate Star Wars like the people involved in the sequels seemed to be
Yeah don't get me wrong, I thought they did a terrible job with his character story wise, which is weird because he had a great setup. Stormtrooper sees the error of his ways and joins the rebellion? Awesome! Even the way he met up with Poe and their bro relationship was great.
It all went to shit for his character after the first film because they didn't know what to do with him. That pointless relationship with Rose (clearly meant just to bring an Asian on board, there was no chemistry there whatsoever) and the retarded casino was unbelievable. I will say that the moment where he was riding on the salt covered planet towards his doom, attempting to sacrifice himself to save his friends in the mine, that would have been the perfect ending for him. From coward to total hero, a beautiful character arc. It would have done a lot for Rey's character too, having basically the first person she met of the group die while saving them.
Of course they couldn't let him die though. Same with Chewbacca. If Rey had killed Chewbacca in the third film that would have been interesting, but they messed that up too. Psyche! He was in the other transport and he's fine! So that scene was basically pointless and contributed nothing to her character. I think there was a salvageable set of films in there, they just didn't have the talent or courage to do anything interesting besides ending all the original cast members other than Chewbacca/Lando.
The key is stop letting the world "sexist" control you.
Just fire back about their genocidal fantasies.
If you stopped at the first sentence you would garner support and be closer to achieving your goals. Instead you continued to the second and lost support. You need to be far more strategic in your approach.
Why? Why aren't we allowed to say that women have far more hate for men than we could ever have for them?
Because of how human psychology works as informed by human biology.
People are always going to innately favor women because doing so serves an evolutionary advantage for the species. Understand and accept this and tailor your strategy accordingly.
Your direct attack of going on about female genocidal fantasies of culling men is going to produce a lizard brain response of outright rejection of anything you have to say. However, appealing to a simple sense of personal autonomy of not letting the words of others control your behavior if much more accessible. Push on the fronts where you can reasonably achieve victory. Getting people to be ok with being called sexist is doable and still serves your goal of keeping women in check and deter them from wreaking havoc on society. Women ain't gonna pull off a genocide if men become ok with being sexist and subsequently ok with asserting authority over women.
No. Because those that come here talking like him are not interested in the facts, only conversion to their cult and trolling.
I heard that Shang-Chi had a sister who was much better than him which seems to be a new trope. I enjoyed the comic books though. But I’ll check it out eventually
Thanks. I remember when eternals was announced I bought a reprint of the comics by Kirby since I knew they wouldn’t follow it.
It's not worth fighting with words. It truly isn't. Everyone here is just posting this stuff to make themselves feel better about a hopeless situation but none of this is truly changing anything.
The way to win the fight is through demographics. Find a submissive and obedient woman then move to a country in which you as a man are allowed to maintain your dominance over the woman, then you have many kids and home-school them under your reign all the while ensuring your money isn't going toward your enemies by disconnecting from the system (Parallel Society). You're better off spending your energy on improving yourself (better skills, better health, etc...) than fighting with these people.
The problem is that you are just 1 man and you're trying to fight all of Hollywood, Social Media, the Government, Public Education, Mainstream news etc... You can't win against that. You do have the truth on your side but most of the time that isn't enough. Most people aren't convinced through words, they are convinced by realities. For example a huge advocate for public universal healthcare might argue against private healthcare for decades, then 1 day he finally has to use the public healthcare system and finds out it's garbage so he's forced to buy healthcare in a different country. Now he's a huge advocate for private healthcare. No matter what you told him, he would never listen but as soon as he experiences the truth, he accepts it. That is how most people learn and it's why arguments online are mostly useless.
The struggle is always for self sustenance; not against others (temptation to ignore self).
The fight you perceive represents a division (reason) caused by your consent to a suggestion (DC, Disney, Star Trek, etc.) Your consent to "not want" what they suggest (woke shit) will put you into a conflict with all those who consent to "want" the suggested. What the majority is being deceived to ignore; is that a) the few suggest to divide the many into reasoning (want vs not want) among each other, and b) either choice (wanting or not wanting the suggested information by others) represents the choice to ignore perceived inspiration; needed for self sustenance.
In other words...before you make the choice to want or not want anything suggested; you make a choice in response to balance (need/want) under natural law.
Your comment is pretty much impossible to understand. You okay? I see parts of your comment that are reasonable and that make sense, but some parts are almost word salad.
Free-will-of-choice is a person pretending to be an AI learning bot. Don't worry about it, you'll get used to them if you lurk moar. It's fine to have a few weird roleplayers here and there.
That's because you view it as suggested information (want or not want); instead of perceived inspiration (need). Understanding (comprehension) can only be grown by adaptation to KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
You're being deceived to view what others suggest as knowledge; while ignoring the only perceived source of everything for it. For example...your senses perceive sound; while the choice of others allows them to shape perceived sound into suggestible meaning (words; brands; idols). When you consent to suggested information (words) you corrupt yourself to ignore the source of perceived inspiration (sound).
Others cannot give you understanding; you falling for the temptation of their suggested information tricks you to "stand under" them aka submitting your will to the suggestion made by their will.
As for impossible...each one represents form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka resistance within velocity aka temporary growth within ongoing loss aka potential within potentiality...ALL is possible; yet each ONE within needs to grow the potential to utilize it; which requires the growth of comprehension (potential) out of perceived (potentiality); while resisting suggested (impotence).
I represent temporary chaos (form) within ongoing order (flow); hence struggling to sustain self; while resisting the temptation of others. Other than that...I'm fine.
a) you already perceived with your senses the written words; upon which you then chose to respond to by suggesting them to be senseless. Instead of trying to judge meaning by suggesting it to others; ask yourself if perceived inspiration represents ALL value; while choice based response represents ONEs evaluation thereof?
b) reason represents conflict (want vs not want) caused by consent to suggestion aka an imbalance that ignores perceived balance (need/want). The parasitic few use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many.
c) your choice of suggested information (want or not want) over perceived inspiration (need or want) is what corrupts you to perceive reality through the filter of a suggested conflict (want vs not want aka reason). Ask yourself...do you need to reason about water; food and shelter or do you need to adapt to thirst; hunger and lack of shelter no matter how much you want or not want it?
What if words are the issue that corrupt communication. What if suggested information like "insane person" can deceive you to consent to idolized meaning; while you ignore perceived meaning aka Insane (in sanus aka within sound) Person (per sonos aka by sound)?
What if real communication represents choice resonating with balance; instead of reasoning (agreement vs disagreement) over suggested choices (dissonance)? What if words as suggestible idols of meaning are used by the parasitic few as spell-craft to corrupt comprehension of perceived communication aka a tool to domesticate free will of choice?
Are you in control over your choice? Can you wield it to allow yourself to question any of the written above without choosing ignorance (want over need) once again? Your choice.
Comment Reported for: Schizophrenia
I can do nothing for him.