Recently I saw the criticism of "you guys call anything with a female or minority woke", and I foolishly engaged this person in an argument. This person was in their late teens (yes I know it was stupid to bother but I thought I could make him see he was wrong). He just stopped responding to me when I pointed out that there are plenty of female/minority characters that were liked across the board but now we live in a time where we are told that we have to like garbage movies or shows or we are bad poeple.
Honestly to me Woke means endless race/gender swaps, overhyping something because it was written or directed by a female/minority, and the ridiculous overrepresentation of lgbt.
My question is, is it even worth trying to fight against all this or just do like I do and mainly watch or read stuff from 2014 and prior? I follow certain youtubers and if they recommend a new show I'll check it out, but I do wonder what purpose it serves to go after DC, Disney, Star Trek, etc since they have shown that they hate us. One of my favorite nerd rants last year was when Eric July was pissed about the lady who was in charge of the Scarlet Witch show because she said she never read comic books and didn't know who Mephisto was. Stuff like this just pisses me off because if we suggest that maybe she do some research into the lore behind her show we are sexists.
So is it worth it to keep fighting?
What are you trying to lure me into here? https://pic8.co/sh/B6uycb.jpg
I'm trying to get you to go away. You type out entire paragraphs to say nothing at all.
How can ONE within ALL aka one thing within everything express nothing?
That's just me adapting to whatever inspires for the sustenance of self; while more or less using the limitations of a public forum to keep it short. What others shape out of it is based on their free will of choice.
That's called a suggestion of information; which for others represents the temptation to ignore perceived inspiration for. What if you resist the temptation to respond to what you not want; while questioning what you need? As in...do you need others to get away; or do you want others to get away. The conflict between wanting vs not wanting others to go away is caused by your consent to the suggestion of others; yet I didn't suggest anything; I responded to a "question for everyone" while using it for inspiration; which seems to be a thorn in your side...
I want you, specifically, to go away.
That entire paragraph was utter nonsense. You wrote all those words, and said nothing at all.
Want implies ignorance of need...need sustains life; want tempts towards death. Your choice.
SPECIF'ICALLY, adverb - "according to the nature of the species". As in HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] What if flow specifies all the form within; which allows responding form to shape self by choice based response to?
Aka towards (from inception towards death) go (form animated by flow) a way (flow aka the one way for all the resulting form within). See, I'm already on the way.
Seeing it; reading it; responding to it; even ignoring it implies use of senses. Nonsense implies your ignorance of perceiving everything through your senses; for the suggested inversion called "nothing" (non). There's no nonexistence within existence; unless one pretends to be; while ignoring what is.
What if you perceive everything; lack comprehension about most of it; while corrupting it further by believing in suggested nothingness?
What came first...perceived sound or suggested words shaped out of perceived sound; then suggested as information in exchange for consent by others to ignore perceived inspiration?
Does nature use words to communicate itself? Ever heard "I'm a tree; stop pissing at me?"