Recently I saw the criticism of "you guys call anything with a female or minority woke", and I foolishly engaged this person in an argument. This person was in their late teens (yes I know it was stupid to bother but I thought I could make him see he was wrong). He just stopped responding to me when I pointed out that there are plenty of female/minority characters that were liked across the board but now we live in a time where we are told that we have to like garbage movies or shows or we are bad poeple.
Honestly to me Woke means endless race/gender swaps, overhyping something because it was written or directed by a female/minority, and the ridiculous overrepresentation of lgbt.
My question is, is it even worth trying to fight against all this or just do like I do and mainly watch or read stuff from 2014 and prior? I follow certain youtubers and if they recommend a new show I'll check it out, but I do wonder what purpose it serves to go after DC, Disney, Star Trek, etc since they have shown that they hate us. One of my favorite nerd rants last year was when Eric July was pissed about the lady who was in charge of the Scarlet Witch show because she said she never read comic books and didn't know who Mephisto was. Stuff like this just pisses me off because if we suggest that maybe she do some research into the lore behind her show we are sexists.
So is it worth it to keep fighting?
And most of us don’t have that level of energy
Consider that form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents the power of resistance (form) within the power of velocity (flow), and that the balance of flow/from represents EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
Question if the parasitic few trick the many to ignore resistance towards velocity (struggle to survive) for suggested progressivism aka consenting to go with the flow by wanting outcomes; seeking goals; aiming for achievements; putting hope towards etc.
What if temporary resisting form within ongoing velocity of flow represents growth potential within loss of potentiality, and what if the many ignore growth through resistance; then the few can farm the ignored potential of energy?
So those who do resist and go against the flow to improve themselves have a higher chance of progress than those who try to stay within flow?
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...one a) exists temporarily within the momentum of ongoing flow; b) form within the momentum of flow implies temporary choice (free will) in response to ongoing balance (need/want), and therefore c) resistance (form) to velocity (flow) doesn't represent against (imbalance); but for the sustenance of self (as choice responding to balance).
The deception one falls for is suggested progressivism aka choosing to "want" to go with the flow towards outcomes; achievements; goals; hopes etc. aka suggested growth in return for following along. What one ignores is that the choice used to consent to suggested information (want or not want); represents the response ability of form (life) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death); hence the choice based response to balance (need/want).
In short...one cannot choose want vs not want (imbalance) without first responding as choice to need or want (balance). Want or not want (towards suggested information) implies the ignorance of need for want (perceived inspiration).
Life is not outcome oriented (inception predefines death; which allows life in-between)...life is balance oriented aka the temporary growth potential (form) within ongoing loss of potentiality (flow) aka magnetic resistance within electric velocity of energy. The parasitic few harvest the ignored potential of the many by suggesting them to not utilize it; to choose ignorance (want) over adherence (need) to self sustenance.
Is the surfer (resistance) in conflict with the water (velocity) or is he balancing within momentum (wave) towards predefined outcome (beach)? Flow represents the ongoing natural order for the temporary formed chaos within. The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many to a) ignore resisting the natural order to instead follow suggested orders, and b) they suggest seeking order out of chaos; which represents the inversion of one representing chaos (form) out of order (flow).
All conflicts (want vs not want) in this system are based on those within choosing to ignore to balance (need over want) by choice; and the parasitic few who exploit this ignorance are branding these conflicts "reason"; rebrand both sides within reason at will (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs evil; believer vs non-believer; right vs left; capitalism vs communism; Coke vs Pepsi; pro-life vs pro-choice; hetero vs homo; Christianity vs Islam; patriarchy vs feminism; white vs black and so on), and suggest contradictions to both sides to keep them within perpetual conflict (talmudic reasoning).
ONEself needs to respond as choice to balance of ALL perceived; while struggling to resist the temptation of what other ONEs are suggesting. Choice responding to perceived balance represents resonance; choice responding to suggested choices represents dissonance. So either ONE resonates with ALL (balance) or ONE ignores this (imbalance) aka need or want, and choosing want over need will cause the want vs not want conflicts (reason).
Choosing need over want grows the seed of ONE within the soil of ALL; hence causing the fruits of ONEs labors; which attract others (a need based hierarchy); while choosing want over need (temptation) causes a corruption base hierarchy aka want tempting more wants; while corrupting others as-well, like greed tempting envy, or ignorance of the many tempting insolence among the few.
huh, this guy's still around
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) each differentiated ONE shares the same path within ALL, and ALL is ONE in energy anyway; so where else than within momentum (balance) could I (choice) be?
As for "around"...it implies a "Dead Or Alive" situation. If one is moved from inception towards death (one direction); then moving around represents the temptation to ignore this or in other words...
"All I know is that to me" - aka ALL that ONE perceives
"You look like you're lots of fun" - aka all others are tempting
"Open up your lovin' arms" - aka suggestion and assumption towards others
"I want some, want some" - choice to ignore need for want causing corruption of temptation.
And then it goes..."You spin me right 'round, baby"..."Right 'round like a record, baby"..."Right 'round, 'round, 'round" - aka falling for the self imposed ego within ones conscious memory aka RECORD', verb transitive [Latin recorder, to call to mind, to remember].
A sleight of hand for all with eyes to see; while simultaneously cultural subversion for the ignorant... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGNiXGX2nLU
Comment Reported for:
There's really nothing I can do about this unless it gets totally out of control
Today we learned that when "free-will-of-choice" is used to respond to "questions for everyone"; then "schizophrenia" accusations will be used in an attempt to shut it down. Fascinating.
Uhh...they spent the last 50 years working towards this.
Only for certain values of 'they.'
Consider the suggestion of corruption as utilization of FRE'QUENCY, noun - "a return or occurrence of a thing often repeated at short intervals" used against form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka resistance (form) to velocity (flow)?
Don't you have a wood statue to burn?
That would represent an EF'FIGY, noun [Latin effigies, from effingo, to fashion; ex and fingo, to form or devise.] - "the image or likeness of a person"; which implies the suggested ignorance of Person aka per sonos aka by sound...hence already formed out of sound.
In short...everything suggested (information) represents idolatry of everything perceived (inspiration).
Get back on your meds. Everything was much nicer without your polluting the threads.