Recently I saw the criticism of "you guys call anything with a female or minority woke", and I foolishly engaged this person in an argument. This person was in their late teens (yes I know it was stupid to bother but I thought I could make him see he was wrong). He just stopped responding to me when I pointed out that there are plenty of female/minority characters that were liked across the board but now we live in a time where we are told that we have to like garbage movies or shows or we are bad poeple.
Honestly to me Woke means endless race/gender swaps, overhyping something because it was written or directed by a female/minority, and the ridiculous overrepresentation of lgbt.
My question is, is it even worth trying to fight against all this or just do like I do and mainly watch or read stuff from 2014 and prior? I follow certain youtubers and if they recommend a new show I'll check it out, but I do wonder what purpose it serves to go after DC, Disney, Star Trek, etc since they have shown that they hate us. One of my favorite nerd rants last year was when Eric July was pissed about the lady who was in charge of the Scarlet Witch show because she said she never read comic books and didn't know who Mephisto was. Stuff like this just pisses me off because if we suggest that maybe she do some research into the lore behind her show we are sexists.
So is it worth it to keep fighting?
That implies wanting the beach as the outcome; which inspires the question as to why did you swim out in the first place? Just to get back? Nah, implies balancing within the moment(um) of motion.
Change the perspective of the scenario to form (life) within the momentum (balance ) of flow (inception towards death). You are already "surfing" as life; why would you go with the flow to reach death quicker instead of resisting for the sustenance of life? The advantage of life implies temporarily existing as form with access to everything offered by flow aka being ONEs evaluation (choice) within of ALL value (balance). Evaluation represents the highest value in existence. If you suggest me the highest value you perceive; I can choose "meh" to devalue it for myself.
Which I used as an allegory for the only specific area where form can exist within flow aka the ever changing moment(um) of motion aka the balance causing ones responding free will of choice.
a) the few who suggest the many to vote for representative government (from govern/to control + ment; form mens/mind) are also the ones who suggest the brand of nations (USA); while the many ignore that United implies U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness."...not togetherness under a consented to idol (USA). Each of us represents the ONE state (form) within ALL (flow), hence nation representing "a people" aka each of them; not the representatives of them using brands and flags as idols to steer them.
b) to ignore implies the choice of want over need; in this case not wanting vs wanting suggested voting. This still represents consent to suggested; causing division (want vs not want aka reasoning) among those consenting; hence the rebranding of want vs not want into republican vs democrat. It's still the same population control by means of suggestion.
c) "for the most part" is where the perceived inspiration operates; because it implies individual ONEs sustaining themselves; while resisting the suggestions of others. This is where the momentum can be utilized for growth by resisting the temptation to go against the suggested beast system (society), and instead struggle to adhere to real system (natural law aka flow to form).
The more do this; the less potency the suggestions of our parasitic ankle-biters have; yet the majority still ignores the source for the parasitic behavior of the few...it represents the response to the ignorance of the many towards perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information) aka ones choice of want over need; instead of need over want. All aspects of society are being suggested to deceive the majority from comprehending the free will of choice and the consequences thereof.
When I say I am headed to the beach, even if I swim out far, I end up back at the beach when finished. Mind you it could be a different beach at first. Just a longer route back to where my stuff is.
"the longer route" implies the resistance of form (life) in response to being moved by flow (inception towards death); and "end up back at" implies ONEs (form) transmutation out of base ALL (flow) aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death). Also; it is ALL (flow) that differentiates itself into the ONEs (form) within. Why? To use perceivable differences to communicate inspiration for the sustenance of ONEself within ALL. If everything perceived would be the same; then what would inspire temporary form to struggle to sustain itself within ongoing flow?