“Women Are The Fairer Sex”
(media.communities.win)
Comments (89)
sorted by:
Heard an interesting idea on Academic Agent's channel, that a country's laws influence its culture.
I had always thought of the culture influencing its laws but it makes sense the reverse would apply too. We've had decades of women being able to (arguably) murder their own child. Normalizing homicide like that has to have affected the culture and Americans' views on the death of others to some degree.
I'm reminded of the post I made the other day about suicide pods, and we saw in that, as with other things, an almost celebration of the death of others. Would something like that or the receptiveness to it even come about if we didn't have decades of infanticide okayed?
If "politics is downstream from culture", you might also say that "laws set the boundaries of new tributaries".
It's horrifying, even as a kid I never understood how abortion ever became a thing. It's the most terrifying thing that's ever happened in creation, the fact it's accepted as normal.
Unpopular opinion:
Without Roe v. Wade the United States would already have failed.
Jury is out on whether that's a good or bad thing.
No, without roe democrat cities would have imploded in the 90s and forced the country to act in order to save itself
You can say that the blacks would have bred like rabbits, you know?
Has nothing to do with democrats.
The whole country would have been overrun.
Have to disagree. Before the advent of the welfare state and free abortions, the percentage of married two-parent households were actually higher among black couples. It's all the fucking demonrats fault. First it was checks and food stamps, then it was crack and weed. Now, it's you can rob all the stores you want and we'll turn a blind eye. But, ultimately, the demonrat vote plantation requires the blood sacrifice.
you talk like you'd love blacks to overrun the US as long as it was with legal two-parent households
There is a galaxy size gap between 'black households used to be more stable' and OMG THE NIGNOG GONNA REPLACE US!!!!!!
Communities where the families are stable have fewer offspring and less infidelity thus less need to kill the babies. But you probably like the idea of them killing all their babies. Keeps those dirty nigs to a relatively small population that can be exterminated easily. Right?
Lighten up Francis.
Which would have provoked a much more harsh response than the 94 crime bill.
Heck, I venture to say we'd actually have decided to solve the problem.
Which is why I included this line:
It could have been good, or it could have just ended the nation quicker.
Doubt it. They would have just killed each other faster.
only if you consider the USA a welfare state first and foremost. Welfare would have failed. We would already be healing. Instead, we creep towards communist mass murder.
I disagree.
They already print money for it. They'd just print it harder like they're doing now, and the white vote would have been eclipsed.
The only solution in that situation would be a violent ethnic cleansing and retaking of land by force.
Agree 100%. We’d have 50% black by now. There is no denying it.
Fair means pretty in the sense of being light-skinned in that context.
Pro-Abortionists get around this by saying they’re not human until they pop out.
Sometimes not even until you cut the cord.
In most extreme examples, not until the mother has acknowledged the fetus as human.
It's all very scientific I can assure you.
Tfw when the creeping realization that the demonic is really out there starts to hit
Now break that Roe v Wade statistic down by race, and you will see why I am for choice.
Old MST3K quote - "My people do not believe in war, we only kill out of personal spite"
Not sure why abortions are being weighed against war deaths. They should be stacked up against homicides.
Ah, a fine addition to my collection.
it aint the white women that first came up with the idea to kill their own children wholesale
Riiggghhttt, because when Sanger visited Hitler it was to learn from the Jews
you've somehow made me more confused than you are
Last I checked sterilization and abortion are the same.
I assumed he was being sarcastic, otherwise I didn't get the point either.
Sterilization to prevent reproduction for eugenic purposes is considered a form of genocide. Taking the step before abortion with the same intent of outcome is the same.
I should have started with forced sterilization to clarify over self sterilization which is the more common form today.
hang on we're missing something here
that's one chick against how many that i linked?
How many of who you listed is considered the patron of Planned Parenthood? How many started the national league of birth control (sterilization)? You listed feminists not abortionists, while the two interlap the work done was completely different.
To be "fair" many men pressure women into abortion to avoid any responsibility of fatherhood. Pretty good Freedom Toon mocking this lately. https://youtu.be/RgeDvrwExTg
Yes it’s the guys fault a woman let them nut repeatedly in them. Next, women feel pressured into dressing like whores by men. Abortion begins and ends with the woman’s decision, men literally have no power in the choice.
You are right about the last part.
But men don't have to "nut" now do they? That's their choice. No woman became pregnant all on her own.
About half of the abortions I factually know about were promoted by the male. The other half they were horrified. I actually know of one where woman got pregnant in spite of contraception by live in boyfriend, but she was planning on breaking up to get with new guy, so she aborted at new guys request and infuriated her boyfriend.
Well there has been numerous times that women have impregnated themselves intentionally without the male knowing or consenting. There was a famous case where a guy got head and the woman used the semen to impregnate, guy was forced to pay child support by judge. Abortion is a tool for reprehensible people who want to live in a world without consequences. However, like I said, the decision always begins and ends with the female, and the law will always take your paycheck and support her.
Genesis: Eve ate of the fruit first and offered to Adam. Romans: Paul says that through one MAN, sin entered the world. (Rom 5:19). Why did it not say by one woman instead?
Biblical pussy-pass
Ok edgelord
I'm not familiar with this case. Do you have any more details? I'd like to read about it
Exceptions don't prove the rule. Yes, sperm jacking is a thing, but rare.
Sperm jacking is far from rare. Unless by rare you mean outside the 80-20 rule. Parental fraud is 13% in the US. These aren’t coincidental numbers, women want children through high value men, you don’t see professional athletes fucktoys getting abortions.
Parental fraud includes more than sperm jacking.
It’s a similar circumstance from the same desire. Which is what was demonstrated in the rest of the statement. Women want higher value men, period. Every statistic shows this from amount of sexual partners to marriages lasting longer than 5 years.
I don’t think you understand how sex works.
Is sex not between a man and a woman?
Excuse me, Mr. Twansphobe, but it's not just men who nut.
My sincerest apologies.
No, his point is that the man who did the nutting is often one who is pressuring the woman to abort, so he can avoid his responsibilities. It's not the fault of alll men.
There is plenty of guilt to go around. Anyone claiming women are solely at fault are fooling themselves.
The problem is a sinful culture that engages in all sorts of immoral behavior and reaps the reward.
A significant amount of blame also goes to those who purposefully encourage and foster this culture from the outside and manipulate the victims of this culture for political gain.
Race really has very little to do with it. Outsiders to this culture — even those of the same race — regularly experience far greater success than those within it.
Yes. Or as it would be said on Reddit: This.
Only because the woman takes no interest in monogamy with that man. She still wants to “live her life”, whatever than means.
I always suspected this user was a woman. This post confirms it.
You suspect everyone of being a woman.
BTW, he's right.
Not everyone. I'm pretty sure you're not.
How so? Am I not the one who disagrees with your views more than anyone? Must be the 'Antonio' part, right?
No, it's because I just feel like if you were a woman, it'd be more obvious.
You're just someone who I'd guess still socially associates with the female supremacist enemy and therefore still sees humanity where there is none.
Damn, I must work harder to support
mytheir privileges then, if it is not obvious enough.I'm not interested in your 'female supremacists' except insofar as they can be used to fight greater evils. It's not a question of morality. I don't care if they are human or not.
What greater evil exists than genocidal fantasists? Vax pushers?
I don't believe you truly think that, given your replies to me sometimes. You must think there's some humanity in them, because you usually reject my calls to ostracize them entirely.
I suspect you of being a woman.
I don't think there's anything that would offend me more than being compared to them.
Most definitely not. Want my wife to chime in? Like last time?