e: Based on the first results I could find for average lung size for men and women (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22182984/) this actually matches almost perfectly. 13% larger lungs per kg in males and 17% higher body weight of the cadavers. 1.13 * 1.17 = 1.32.
I am almost certain rapes and attacks on women would increase if this ever happened. Remember, nothing hates a woman more than another woman, not even a male feminist.
And to do it, they had to set fire to the mask narrative (by pointing out they had to use a HEPA filter to trap the viral particles). They're tearing up deck chairs on the Titanic to build a life raft.
They've always admitted that cloth masks barely do anything. The studies that get linked in all the news stories pushing masks always have a couple percent difference between masked and unmasked and always within the margin or error. The Danish study that came out early that showed masks don't protect the wearer by those standards would be counted as a win for masks; it's just the mask skeptics got to it first and managed to establish a narrative. That can't happen anymore as any mask study is immediately heralded as a victory for masks no matter how small the effect.
If you go back to pre-coof mask studies that show masks don't work they generally show the same thing, a couple percent difference (of whatever, cases, particles, it doesn't really matter) and within the margin of error. It's just back then because the science was unimportant to those in power the results weren't considered sufficient to overturn the null hypothesis.
Early on I noticed I could temporarily shift a pro-masker from "masks are the key to stop the pandemic" to "yes, masks barely work but WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING ITS A PANDEMIC" but as soon as pressure was released they would go back to "masks are the key to stop the pandemic." It's a motte and bailey but I think it was subconscious. The NPC meme is real, folks.
I wrote a meta-analysis in April that showed masks are basically useless, with a negligible benefit at best (the right type of masks worn properly, etc.). Practically speaking, almost nobody is wearing them this way anyways, so they're basically useless. This has been known for a long time. Still people are so easy to manipulate. Nobody seems to be willing to do their own research anymore.
They outsourced their thinking to "the experts." There was an article in late 2020 that I got linked to often when I said masks only worked at best a couple of percent saying if there was a national mask mandate it would prevent 200,000 cases. I would then point out that number was calculated from the 2% reduction figure that they were arguing against and point to the link to the study in the article and where in the study the 2% was mentioned and they would immediately flip to "we have to do something." It was both funny and depressing because despite them getting okie dokied super hard it didn't change a single mind.
It’s the same with “social distancing”, which was never advocated for during past, arguably worse, “pandemics”…
Also lockdowns and curfews.
They can ONLY get away with those things now because of the internet, and the fake “service economy” where most jobs don’t really physically produce or DO anything…
These measures would never have worked back when people had real “work” (ergo any time in the last several centuries prior to the last couple of decades), or still interacted largely in person. They could never have worked back when SOME, at least, of the media, still held “truth to power”…
Oddly, I don’t think the circumstances that have led us to where we are now, in this “pandemic”, have existed since at least the 1930s, which suggests that… Something very fucking fishy is going on.
War is coming. It’s just a question of who will be fighting who, and who wins…
The brain uses a huge supply of oxygen. In unrelated news, checkmarks are the most efficient air-users, using the least fresh air while producing the most hot of it.
Who wants to bet the males participating in the study weighed roughly 34% more than the females on average. Thanks science, very cool.
Doesn't even need to be limited to the study, that's the average difference between men and women by body mass.
Whoa, slow down there, bigot.
e: Based on the first results I could find for average lung size for men and women (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22182984/) this actually matches almost perfectly. 13% larger lungs per kg in males and 17% higher body weight of the cadavers. 1.13 * 1.17 = 1.32.
So if assigned-male-at-birtheds identify as female, their lungs collapse? How awful!
That’s crazy. Next you’ll be saying males have larger brains too
Pretty sure Peru literally tried that, for a while, so they’re rather late to the game…
I don’t think it worked terrible well, but they did do it, last year!
I am almost certain rapes and attacks on women would increase if this ever happened. Remember, nothing hates a woman more than another woman, not even a male feminist.
And to do it, they had to set fire to the mask narrative (by pointing out they had to use a HEPA filter to trap the viral particles). They're tearing up deck chairs on the Titanic to build a life raft.
They've always admitted that cloth masks barely do anything. The studies that get linked in all the news stories pushing masks always have a couple percent difference between masked and unmasked and always within the margin or error. The Danish study that came out early that showed masks don't protect the wearer by those standards would be counted as a win for masks; it's just the mask skeptics got to it first and managed to establish a narrative. That can't happen anymore as any mask study is immediately heralded as a victory for masks no matter how small the effect.
If you go back to pre-coof mask studies that show masks don't work they generally show the same thing, a couple percent difference (of whatever, cases, particles, it doesn't really matter) and within the margin of error. It's just back then because the science was unimportant to those in power the results weren't considered sufficient to overturn the null hypothesis.
Early on I noticed I could temporarily shift a pro-masker from "masks are the key to stop the pandemic" to "yes, masks barely work but WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING ITS A PANDEMIC" but as soon as pressure was released they would go back to "masks are the key to stop the pandemic." It's a motte and bailey but I think it was subconscious. The NPC meme is real, folks.
I wrote a meta-analysis in April that showed masks are basically useless, with a negligible benefit at best (the right type of masks worn properly, etc.). Practically speaking, almost nobody is wearing them this way anyways, so they're basically useless. This has been known for a long time. Still people are so easy to manipulate. Nobody seems to be willing to do their own research anymore.
They outsourced their thinking to "the experts." There was an article in late 2020 that I got linked to often when I said masks only worked at best a couple of percent saying if there was a national mask mandate it would prevent 200,000 cases. I would then point out that number was calculated from the 2% reduction figure that they were arguing against and point to the link to the study in the article and where in the study the 2% was mentioned and they would immediately flip to "we have to do something." It was both funny and depressing because despite them getting okie dokied super hard it didn't change a single mind.
It’s the same with “social distancing”, which was never advocated for during past, arguably worse, “pandemics”… Also lockdowns and curfews.
They can ONLY get away with those things now because of the internet, and the fake “service economy” where most jobs don’t really physically produce or DO anything…
These measures would never have worked back when people had real “work” (ergo any time in the last several centuries prior to the last couple of decades), or still interacted largely in person. They could never have worked back when SOME, at least, of the media, still held “truth to power”…
Oddly, I don’t think the circumstances that have led us to where we are now, in this “pandemic”, have existed since at least the 1930s, which suggests that… Something very fucking fishy is going on.
War is coming. It’s just a question of who will be fighting who, and who wins…
Thats a very accurate metaphor.
What was the metaphor?? I just missed it before they deleted it, ha… 😒
Oh, never mind, it was a different comment that was deleted… Confusing. 🤦🏻♂️
I see now. The Titanic bit, right..?
"Larger people breathe more"
Shocker!
The brain uses a huge supply of oxygen. In unrelated news, checkmarks are the most efficient air-users, using the least fresh air while producing the most hot of it.
Wait till they use this to blame global warming on us.
It's all so predictable and tiresome. Well, killing 80%-90% of men is obviously the only answer.
Brought to you by: A Team of Twats.
This is why we need to abolish universities and start over.