Children understand consent (and therefore can consent)
Children understand their own sexuality (and therefore should be free to explore it)
Pedophilia is natural (and therefore shouldn't be stigmatized or illegal)
Once those pillars are raised pedo normalization is inevitable, because it's a very small step to "wouldn't you want children to explore their sexuality with someone sexually and emotionally experienced who they trust?"
Consent is already the only valid constraint on pretty much everything in leftism, including sexuality. And the only thing holding back the tide there is the idea that children cannot consent, which is weakened every day when children can have abortions and receive vaccinations without their parents' knowledge or consent.
have you missed out on the part where it's evil and bigoted to not have sex with a higher member of the leftist hierarchy, regardless of the lower member's desire?
Remember when they blasted Rush for that? They claimed he didn't believe in consent. Rush was really pointing out that they believe only in consent and no other factors.
One article that stuck with me a while back was a new mom explaining that she got her baby's consent before changing a diaper, with the goal that the young child would understand his bodily autonomy. I knew it was weird and wrong but couldn't articulate why. This is why. A baby consenting to a diaper change is about one short and curly away from a toddler consenting to penetration.
Worth hammering home that MAP == paedophile.
Pretty sure it means "Munitions Attracting Person."
The three pillars of pedo normalization:
Once those pillars are raised pedo normalization is inevitable, because it's a very small step to "wouldn't you want children to explore their sexuality with someone sexually and emotionally experienced who they trust?"
You forgot the first pillar:
Everything stems from this anti-morality.
Consent is already the only valid constraint on pretty much everything in leftism, including sexuality. And the only thing holding back the tide there is the idea that children cannot consent, which is weakened every day when children can have abortions and receive vaccinations without their parents' knowledge or consent.
Except as it pertains to what is injected into your body.
have you missed out on the part where it's evil and bigoted to not have sex with a higher member of the leftist hierarchy, regardless of the lower member's desire?
Remember when they blasted Rush for that? They claimed he didn't believe in consent. Rush was really pointing out that they believe only in consent and no other factors.
One article that stuck with me a while back was a new mom explaining that she got her baby's consent before changing a diaper, with the goal that the young child would understand his bodily autonomy. I knew it was weird and wrong but couldn't articulate why. This is why. A baby consenting to a diaper change is about one short and curly away from a toddler consenting to penetration.
Decaying and subverted cultures waste increasingly large amounts of resources on idiotic, wasteful, harmful endeavors.
You know what would save more kids as well as resources? The fucking rope.
Deporting pedoes to a small, uninhabited island after implanting cameras in their foreheads would be just as effective.
The Sean Locke Nazis show would be quite entertaining.
Manifest yourselves. But beware: there are yet men in society who have remained men...
By this logic and observation, one must reach the conclusion that most members of Homo Sapiens are not, in fact, human.
Marx proclaimed to be a Christian as a kid, then later turned to Satan and decided he wanted to destroy the entire world just to spite God.
Marx 1
Marx 2
Marx 3
Source: Marx & Satan by Richard Wurmbrand pdf
They still have it. Whether they choose to not use it is a different case entirely.