George Soros -- the Nazi collaborator, the riot and revolution sponsor, the breaker of the Bank of England, the bankrupter of millions, the Wall Street predator -- will tell you what is good and what is bad. And what you can and can't say, including about him.
The idea that liberal billionaires like Soros and Hoffman (and Omidyar) are going to save society by using their limitless wealth to police the internet for what they regard as disinformation, extremism and hate speech is one of the creepiest and dystopic things I've heard.
As I wrote yesterday, almost every group that purports to fight "extremism" and "disinformation" online is funded by the same small handful of like-minded liberal billionaires and western security state services:
All three of these billionaires -- Soros, Hoffman and Omidyar -- fund groups and outlets that aggressively spread disinformation. The idea that they are going to use their vast wealth to police the internet in the name of keeping us safe is laughable.
Following a December 20, 1998 60 Minutes interview[168] in which Soros related his experiences when at the age of 13, the Nazis occupied his native Hungary,[169] right-wing figures such as Alex Jones, Dinesh D'Souza, Glenn Beck, Roseanne Barr,[170] James Woods, Ann Coulter,[169] Louie Gohmert,[168] Marjorie Taylor Greene,[171] and Donald Trump Jr.,[172] promulgated the false conspiracy theory, which has been described as anti-Semitic, that Soros was a Nazi collaborator who turned in other Jews and stole their property during the occupation
That interview he "related his experiences" thusly:
Host cont’d
… went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property of the Jews.
Soros cont’d
That’s right. Yes.
Host cont’d
That sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult??
Soros cont’d
Uh. Not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t see the connection but it created no problem at all.
Host cont’d
No feeling of guilt?
Soros cont’d
No.
Host cont’d
For example, “I’m Jewish and here I am watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.” None of that?
Soros cont’d
Well. Of course I could be on the other side. I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away, uh, but there was no sense I shouldn’t be there because there was – Well, actually, (in a) funny way it’s just like in markets that if I weren’t there (of course I wasn’t doing it) Somebody else would be taking it away anyhow. Whether I was there or not (I was only a spectator) the property was being taken away. So – I had no role in taking away that property so I had no sense of guilt.
It’s a self indulgent argument, he chose himself over others. His career is an exact replica of that time period, he chose to benefit himself at the cost of others because “someone else would have done it.” It’s an irrational argument of wolves to justify their slaughter of sheep.
I easily could have gone the same route he did, it’s not exactly difficult to make a living fucking other people over. The difference is in what a person values, I’m Faustian by nature, so the pursuit of learning holds the most sway to me. This is why I joined the military, why I spent time in the poorest countries in the world, and why I was obsessed with the human condition since I was little. I graduated high school with a 1.7 GPA because the way schools taught and their materials bored me, I concurrently got a 32 on my ACT. Soros chose to make people suffer, he intentionally crashed markets and financed the mass immigration from the third world, this was not done out of indifference, but malice. Even the most milquetoast individual is capable of great cruelty through indifference, but they do not seek to do things cruelly.
I’m not arguing the morality of what he did during the Holocaust, but the actions he took after. He repeatedly did the exact same thing he did in the Holocaust for personal gain, the only lesson he learned from that time was to be the one receiving others property, not the middle man.
I think Soros was like 10-13 or something when this happened. I don't hate a scared Jewish boy for helping the Nazis while stuck under their thumb. It's the fact that any decent person would feel some guilt about it- he doesn't. Just like he doesn't feel bad about all the people being hurt, raped and even killed as a direct result of his helping violent criminals walk the street.
I don't think most humans would do what he did. Most humans at the time made a run for it, screwed over the system, did the minimal possible or turned traitor as soon as it became possible. The Nazi's had it pretty bad in terms of people being loyal. Italy basically overthrew itself as soon as it became relevant. Operations in France were never good and loads of German staff tried to kill Hitler and disarm the SS.
Many people like to point out that the superior orders defence aka the Nuremberg defence could help protect you since you're just doing your job but the defence immediately collapses one you have a moral choice. There was no gun to his head, there was no shielding of the information. He knew what he was doing was wrong and he did it. We can see now that loads of people are happy to be fired over not taking a vaccine, these are the people who are under tough times and yet they are not compliant and taking the vaccine wouldn't kill anyone under most circumstances (but so would not taking it but that's besides the point). Most people would not be happy or even willing to do Soro's job and that's not even commenting on what he does at the present.
The leftists commenting beneath these tweets are legitimately deranged. They think that conservatives have been controlling the internet all along, and now it’s leftists’ turn. There is no evidence for this assertion. Leftists wield almost total power over social media and the internet. Trump starting his own Twitter isn’t even in the same ballpark as what Soros does. He owns like half of our urban district attorneys, FFS.
https://twitter.com/ezralevant/status/1453077188295729155
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1453067107063812107
Wikiality:
That interview he "related his experiences" thusly:
Host cont’d
… went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property of the Jews.
Soros cont’d
That’s right. Yes.
Host cont’d
That sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult??
Soros cont’d
Uh. Not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t see the connection but it created no problem at all.
Host cont’d
No feeling of guilt?
Soros cont’d
No.
Host cont’d
For example, “I’m Jewish and here I am watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.” None of that?
Soros cont’d
Well. Of course I could be on the other side. I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away, uh, but there was no sense I shouldn’t be there because there was – Well, actually, (in a) funny way it’s just like in markets that if I weren’t there (of course I wasn’t doing it) Somebody else would be taking it away anyhow. Whether I was there or not (I was only a spectator) the property was being taken away. So – I had no role in taking away that property so I had no sense of guilt.
It’s a self indulgent argument, he chose himself over others. His career is an exact replica of that time period, he chose to benefit himself at the cost of others because “someone else would have done it.” It’s an irrational argument of wolves to justify their slaughter of sheep.
I easily could have gone the same route he did, it’s not exactly difficult to make a living fucking other people over. The difference is in what a person values, I’m Faustian by nature, so the pursuit of learning holds the most sway to me. This is why I joined the military, why I spent time in the poorest countries in the world, and why I was obsessed with the human condition since I was little. I graduated high school with a 1.7 GPA because the way schools taught and their materials bored me, I concurrently got a 32 on my ACT. Soros chose to make people suffer, he intentionally crashed markets and financed the mass immigration from the third world, this was not done out of indifference, but malice. Even the most milquetoast individual is capable of great cruelty through indifference, but they do not seek to do things cruelly.
I’m not arguing the morality of what he did during the Holocaust, but the actions he took after. He repeatedly did the exact same thing he did in the Holocaust for personal gain, the only lesson he learned from that time was to be the one receiving others property, not the middle man.
I think Soros was like 10-13 or something when this happened. I don't hate a scared Jewish boy for helping the Nazis while stuck under their thumb. It's the fact that any decent person would feel some guilt about it- he doesn't. Just like he doesn't feel bad about all the people being hurt, raped and even killed as a direct result of his helping violent criminals walk the street.
I don't think most humans would do what he did. Most humans at the time made a run for it, screwed over the system, did the minimal possible or turned traitor as soon as it became possible. The Nazi's had it pretty bad in terms of people being loyal. Italy basically overthrew itself as soon as it became relevant. Operations in France were never good and loads of German staff tried to kill Hitler and disarm the SS.
Many people like to point out that the superior orders defence aka the Nuremberg defence could help protect you since you're just doing your job but the defence immediately collapses one you have a moral choice. There was no gun to his head, there was no shielding of the information. He knew what he was doing was wrong and he did it. We can see now that loads of people are happy to be fired over not taking a vaccine, these are the people who are under tough times and yet they are not compliant and taking the vaccine wouldn't kill anyone under most circumstances (but so would not taking it but that's besides the point). Most people would not be happy or even willing to do Soro's job and that's not even commenting on what he does at the present.
I get the argument if it’s not me, I’m there and someone else is here, but the clear lack of compassion of what happened to those people is crazy
I don't blame a young teenage Soros for helping the Nazis, but any decent person would have a sense of guilt. I think only a psychopath wouldn't.
"Are we the Baddies?"
"No, it says 'Good' right on the badge, see?"
My Heart Will Go On (recorder version) - Celine Dion
From now on, everyone should refer to Soros as "Nazi collaborator, George Soros."
The leftists commenting beneath these tweets are legitimately deranged. They think that conservatives have been controlling the internet all along, and now it’s leftists’ turn. There is no evidence for this assertion. Leftists wield almost total power over social media and the internet. Trump starting his own Twitter isn’t even in the same ballpark as what Soros does. He owns like half of our urban district attorneys, FFS.
Jesus that's fucking dystopian.
I wonder what his next projects are gonna be?
A sexual abuse awareness movement called "No random anal violation here".
A gun confiscation effort called "We're totally not gonna resell these later".
An anti-GMO organization called "This will finally solve all starvation in the third world."
I can’t wait for a billionaire to decide what we’re allowed to think.
/s
It would take a few weeks before this powerful organization is captured by every dishonest lawyer in the US :
Rolex lawyers - we need to flag knockoff cheap imports and copyright infringement
Pfizer - we’ve already seen doctors banned from youtube for reporting on vaccine side effects.
Just today, Here’s another post that facebook AND youtube decided today we were not allowed to see - because it exposed the racism of trans activists - https://twitter.com/0rf/status/1452815419945984009?s=21
1984 intensifies.
Should have gone with Doubleplusgood Information Inc.
I guess we should've renamed GG as Good Guys back in the day.