That sounds about right to be honest. Leftists don't want to cause themselves any harm by virtue signaling, but of course they're happy to destroy everyone and everything around them for those sweet woke points.
I've read that they all quit within 10 years because the lifestyle is so unhealthy. I tried it once and I totally understand. You can't feel nourished without quality proteins. I think if you're squeamish about killing animals (I imagine that's why you'd be vegan) then at least eat eggs.
The amount of energy differential that animal fat produces in the human body versus plant fat is hilariously one sided. The simple fact of the matter is countries that have a meat based diet grow taller, stronger, and have stronger hormone development. All ethnicities are growing taller and more built in America.
In Africa the meat/milk consuming tribes conquered all the agrarian ones. It was the same in Asia with the Huns, who also drank milk and ate animal flesh. They wrecked all the poor rice farmers.
I'm not a vegetarian, yet suffer from depression, the real bad shit, but that's because I'm autistic and normies did terrible things to me. But, I'm now a bitter fucking internet asshole, so it evened out.
Thanks for the f-ing normies of being assholes and ruining autistic peoples lives.
The mistreatment I experienced throughout my entire childhood/early adulthood made me distrust everything, so I have to thank them for being sceptical about governments (especially socialists).
Well I guess I can always going hunting for vegetarians and kill two birds with one stone. First I get a cheap source of non-renewable protein (they can't fuck and if they do they neuter their kids) and I get rid of a Biden voter. It's a win/win for everyone.
This has been know for a while. There's a book originally written in the 1930s/40s called Nutrition and Physical Degeneration that lays out why the modern "lean" diet is horrifically bad for you. Essentially, reject modern food, eat like you're in the 18th century.
I think the vast majority of the population wouldn't even know where to start to do that. I sure as hell don't know where/how to buy in bulk or how to butcher anything.
Yeah if you learn to cook it is kind of amazing. You can use every part of the animal. I only recently got into making broth/bone broth, and I'm sad I didn't do it sooner. It's awesome to, for example, roast a chicken for a meal and then use the leftover carcass to make broth to drink the next day. I kick myself thinking of how much nutritious food I wasted before...
OK, cheapest champagne -- real Champagne, from Champagne -- I can find is $36.00/750ml. Champagne is about 1g/ml, maybe 1% less; call it 0.740kg. That's about 1.63 pounds or $22/lb.
Following up, looks like Dom Perignon is running about $200/750ml. $123/lb. USDA Prime filet mignon is about $85/lb. So depending on how you draw your equivalences, champagne and steak aren't all that far apart in cost now. I figure Dom and prime filet are pretty close in market level, but I'm not sure where "cheapest actual champagne" fits in.
Technikally... (I know, internet though): Everything is a closed cycle. Oil is just carbon captured from plants and animals long ago, which got it from the land and air back then, so importing a tower of truck tires and burning it just to watch the smoke billow is technically closed-cycle.
On the other hand, in the realm of more restrictions in definitions: Due to transportation of goods and services, nothing is really zero net carbon. Because you're not, generally speaking, spawning the food for the animal to grow in from the aether. And getting it to market also has a footprint in processing and transit, too.
First thought in my head was when Charlton Heston shows E. G. Robinson the hunk of meat he's purloined from an elite's home and they both just about weep with joy.
Climate Change is nothing more than the elites trying to make everything they own and eat more exclusive to their economic class. They are laughing at us as they try to convince us that eating bugs is better than steak.
All livestock and manure constitute 5.8% of greenhouse gasses. So even if cow farts are actually a danger to the world, getting aliens to abduct every single cow would have virtually no impact on greenhouse gasses overall.
Good. Fuck vegans. Bunch of stuck up assholes.
That sounds about right to be honest. Leftists don't want to cause themselves any harm by virtue signaling, but of course they're happy to destroy everyone and everything around them for those sweet woke points.
I've read that they all quit within 10 years because the lifestyle is so unhealthy. I tried it once and I totally understand. You can't feel nourished without quality proteins. I think if you're squeamish about killing animals (I imagine that's why you'd be vegan) then at least eat eggs.
The amount of energy differential that animal fat produces in the human body versus plant fat is hilariously one sided. The simple fact of the matter is countries that have a meat based diet grow taller, stronger, and have stronger hormone development. All ethnicities are growing taller and more built in America.
In Africa the meat/milk consuming tribes conquered all the agrarian ones. It was the same in Asia with the Huns, who also drank milk and ate animal flesh. They wrecked all the poor rice farmers.
Vegetarians are also more likely to suffer from depression: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165032721007771
I'm not a vegetarian, yet suffer from depression, the real bad shit, but that's because I'm autistic and normies did terrible things to me. But, I'm now a bitter fucking internet asshole, so it evened out.
Woohoo, go fucked up autismos!
Thompson Learning Direct correspondence school graduate here.
Thanks for the f-ing normies of being assholes and ruining autistic peoples lives.
The mistreatment I experienced throughout my entire childhood/early adulthood made me distrust everything, so I have to thank them for being sceptical about governments (especially socialists).
Well I guess I can always going hunting for vegetarians and kill two birds with one stone. First I get a cheap source of non-renewable protein (they can't fuck and if they do they neuter their kids) and I get rid of a Biden voter. It's a win/win for everyone.
Sadly they're still a Biden voter beyond the grave. Also, the meat will be stringy and tough.
/S
Save a cow, eat a vegan.
https://files.catbox.moe/r8q166.jpg
This has been know for a while. There's a book originally written in the 1930s/40s called Nutrition and Physical Degeneration that lays out why the modern "lean" diet is horrifically bad for you. Essentially, reject modern food, eat like you're in the 18th century.
Buy bulk, cut yourself. It's cheaper that way.
Got a shoebox of sirloin in the freezer.
I think the vast majority of the population wouldn't even know where to start to do that. I sure as hell don't know where/how to buy in bulk or how to butcher anything.
Yeah if you learn to cook it is kind of amazing. You can use every part of the animal. I only recently got into making broth/bone broth, and I'm sad I didn't do it sooner. It's awesome to, for example, roast a chicken for a meal and then use the leftover carcass to make broth to drink the next day. I kick myself thinking of how much nutritious food I wasted before...
OK, cheapest champagne -- real Champagne, from Champagne -- I can find is $36.00/750ml. Champagne is about 1g/ml, maybe 1% less; call it 0.740kg. That's about 1.63 pounds or $22/lb.
Following up, looks like Dom Perignon is running about $200/750ml. $123/lb. USDA Prime filet mignon is about $85/lb. So depending on how you draw your equivalences, champagne and steak aren't all that far apart in cost now. I figure Dom and prime filet are pretty close in market level, but I'm not sure where "cheapest actual champagne" fits in.
It's like these people have never heard of poaching. Or what happened to all the pets and zoo animals in Venezuela
I'll be turning on the pakis. Always wondered if they come pre-spiced. Bet they do.
Technikally... (I know, internet though): Everything is a closed cycle. Oil is just carbon captured from plants and animals long ago, which got it from the land and air back then, so importing a tower of truck tires and burning it just to watch the smoke billow is technically closed-cycle.
On the other hand, in the realm of more restrictions in definitions: Due to transportation of goods and services, nothing is really zero net carbon. Because you're not, generally speaking, spawning the food for the animal to grow in from the aether. And getting it to market also has a footprint in processing and transit, too.
I look forward to the Soylent Green/Make Room! Make Room! future where I need to procure my steaks from black market smugglers.
First thought in my head was when Charlton Heston shows E. G. Robinson the hunk of meat he's purloined from an elite's home and they both just about weep with joy.
i will not change anything until china is brought to heel.
If they pass the tax, Democrats, it's what's for dinner!
Climate Change is nothing more than the elites trying to make everything they own and eat more exclusive to their economic class. They are laughing at us as they try to convince us that eating bugs is better than steak.
All livestock and manure constitute 5.8% of greenhouse gasses. So even if cow farts are actually a danger to the world, getting aliens to abduct every single cow would have virtually no impact on greenhouse gasses overall.
Oh well, if that be the case then it's time to go full on Cannibal ;)...can't imagine Vegans would taste nice though
Walmarts got buffalo's wandering around it last I checked and these wheeled ones cant even take a corner to fast.
They are mostly made out of fat though. Not a lot of meat. They can be processed into other goods if needed.
Dunno, I mean they're basically grass-fed. That's supposed to be pretty good.
Oh I see what you did there :D Touche! :D
Of COURSE it's fucking Scandinavia