Talk about the racket. Tell everyone what it really is. The exploitation of broken men who are deliberately broken by a feminine culture from childhood.
Not this. This is bullshit. This gives them legitimacy.
They think those "losers" deserve being taken advantage of financially and emotionally, and are at the same time the evil oppressors forcing these poor innocent women to engage in sordid acts.
No, I have zero sympathy for the garbage lying to everyone about how much they make.
I sincerely hope they get struck down by something painful and incurable, because that's what they deserve. And that's not a call to violence, because unlike feminists, I don't run a biolab in China.
What I mean is that they made a whole generation of kids hate themselves to make this racket function. None of it is by accident.
No, I have zero sympathy for the garbage lying to everyone about how much they make.
Most of them make close to nothing, while a small number rake in the cash. That is a tragedy for those who are groomed into this, like the women who say: "I'm glad I'm finally 18 so I can make my OF".
I sincerely hope they get struck down by something painful and incurable
Your hatred for thots is disproportionate. Normal people regard them as a nuisance.
What I mean is that they made a whole generation of kids hate themselves
No one hates himself, except for virtue-signalers. Nor were those 20-year-old thots involved in 'making' 20-year-old coomers do anything.
You're basing that on what exactly? What they tell you?
It's a universal law, that of the Black Swan, which was confirmed by the information that you gave me. If the average is a few thousand a month, while some make millions, then most are making peanuts for degrading themselves and ruining their futures.
You don't think that being subjected to constant verbal attacks just for being born "wrong" would harm someone's mental state?
I'm sure it harmed you, because you're fixated on it. The average man has no idea at all that some Twitter idiots say that men are trash. And frankly, if that harms you psychologically, then you deserve the harm.
If I said that women are trash, and some women were traumatized by that, my response would not be regret. It would be to laugh at them for being fragile.
That's one of the issues I have with sites like these — they've lowered the barriers to entry for young women, up to the point where they can ruin their entire lives with a few taps on their phone.
Even if their promises of untold riches were true (and most people here know that it's only the top x% making bank), these women aren't being made aware of the permanent and irreversible consequences that this will have. WhenIf they have any regrets in 10 years time, there is no undo button. But when you are young and impressionable, no one thinks that far ahead.
Yes, they are adults and they should be allowed to make their own decisions in life, but I do not agree with a system that encourages young women to become digital prostitutes, whilst painting over the stigma with a coat of 'sexual liberation'.
Even if their promises of untold riches were true (and most people here know that it's only the top x% making bank), these women aren't being made aware of the permanent and irreversible consequences that this will have. When If they have any regrets in 10 years time, there is no undo button. But when you are young and impressionable, no one thinks that far ahead.
And being young and impressionable, even if they do strike gold and make millions, they're not going to invest it wisely. They're going to buy Louis Vutton bags and live life to the fullest and be utterly destitute by the time their time runs out.
Those women are just as much victims of the cosmopolitan hedonism pushed by corporate propaganda as the men. If these women were saturated in a culture that told them the loss of chastity would make them depraved and truthfully portrayed the sad mess that is the childless woman, these girls would desire nothing more than to support a healthy family under a strong patriarch, which is already their natural inclination that is heavily suppressed. You can't blame the cattle for eating the grass placed in front of them.
I agree they're not victims, and that they're voluntarily purchasing these services.
But it still bugs me in the same way I get bugged by televangelists take advantage of desperate people, people selling homeopathic medicine for serious ailments, or shady loan sharks preying upon debt-ridden people.
I don't think OnlyFans should be banned, because that's a slippery slope to head down, but I do think that sites like these which are based upon allowing the customer to engage with the performer, will lead towards more serious issues down the line, in way that is way worse than say, strip clubs or brothels.
I agree with you 100% about western society being deeply, violently anti-male and encouraging boys to either become consoomer drones or kill themselves.
But all throughout human history, low tier men have been m'lady-defending sycophants who are desperate for female validation. It's even in the bible. Hell, people talk about 1920s America as if it was legal for a husband to shove his wife into a wood chipper if she spoke back to him, yet this is the same generation that decided women should get all the privileges of democracy without the consequences of having to defend it.
At very, very few points in human history have women not been placed on a pedestal and worshiped as demigods. It's human nature. More specifically, it's the nature of men who have nothing to offer the world.
Misandry should be exposed and attacked at every opportunity, but so should simping. If men who subscribe to an onlyfans were universally reviled as the garbage they are, you'd see it happen less often. Being an onlyfans simp should be treated the same as being an animal abuser. It's morally reprehensible.
But let's be honest. You only care about this way of people self-medicating in unhealthy ways because it involves women. Again, sex work is not work, whores are whores, I don't fucking support that.
But you are buttmad because of pussy again.
Meanwhile, people also become addicted to everything from cigarettes, to fast food, to vidya, to Twitter, to everything and those ain't a problem because you haven't found the magical connection to women YET.
Pretty sure the average OnlyFans thot is not even aware of this alleged 'psychological damage' you keep screaming about.
I mean, your argument doesn't even make sense. Assuming arguendo that this 'psychological damage' exists (which is self-inflicted in your case, by the way), you suggest that they are only allowed to 'profit' off of those who were damaged by men, and not women.
No, that's even more of a mess. A proper comparison would be to claim that the 'patriarchy' teaches girls to hate themselves, so... they pay you to shove objects in your anus and film it with your OnlyFans account.
What I'm trying to say is that OnlyFans is just women profiting off the fact that other women put in a lot of work to break the self-esteem of little boys for them to exploit.
You see those little boys who act like girls because their mom wanted them to, right? You must understand the concept of conditioning that they are using to make this work. It's the same one as transgenderism but a different outcome.
What I'm trying to say is that OnlyFans is just women profiting off the fact that other women put in a lot of work to break the self-esteem of little boys for them to exploit.
Yes, I know that part, but it makes little sense. So it would be OK with you if it was men who were doing that, but because - you claim - it's women, it's bad?
Also, the self-esteem movement is cringe, as are you.
You see those little boys who act like girls because their mom wanted them to,
No, they just believed your stories of female privilege. I'm sure of it. Also, the boys aren't nearly as damaged as the girls as they usually don't amputate body parts.
You must understand the concept of conditioning that they are using to make this work.
Yes, all the girls who want to have a masectomy because their dad wanted a son.
There's no point going after Onlyfans. Onlyfans is a symptom, not the underlying issue. You shut down Onlyfans, they are all on another site before the end of the week.
The underlying issue is communists in academia, communists in media, communists in corporations, and communists in government.
Nothing less than an ultraviolence purge will fix it.
It's the breakdown of lifelong monogamy, not phantom 'communists', who caused this issue. Robert Wright, not known for being based, spells it out pretty well in The Moral Animal, which surprised me greatly.
Who do you think caused the breakdown of monogamy!?
The invention of fairly reliable contraception.
They admit it openly in their books!
I doubt it. Marx wrote about how he wanted to break down the family, but this was removed from the final version, as communism back then was more popular than destroying the family. The reason for that was not what we are talking about here, but because families are a stronger unit against a potentially tyrannical state.
"Ukrainian-American businessman Leonid Radvinsky, owner of MyFreeCams, acquired 75% ownership of Fenix International Limited and became its director. After this, OnlyFans became increasingly focused on not safe for work (NSFW) content and 'gained a pop culture reputation for being a hive of pornography'"
It seems like the reason that OnlyFans exists is similar to much of the rest of the pornography industry.
Eh, attacking OF itself is a pointless endeavor. Say it closes down, then the thots and simps merely go somewhere else. And ofc there's other things online that play off the same psychological mechanisms that onlyfans does: Epal (users pay for women to play vidya with them, formerly e-girl.gg), twitch streamers, vtubers, and probably many more I don't know about. Onlyfans and their ilk are all symptoms of greater social ills.
If someone really wanted to put a stop to OF then you'd have to go further upstream to the societal problems creating the masses of lonely people using these services. None of those would be the lucrative cash-cows they are otherwise.
Epal (users pay for women to play vidya with them, formerly e-girl.gg)
Wow, that.... that's a new kind of pathetic. Exploiting the loneliness of young males to get them to pay thots to play games with them?
Back in my day we used to meet people and make friends at arcades. Barring that, we used to have this little thing that only Nintendo seems to respect these days called split-screen, where you would invite people over to play within proximity of one another.
But sadly today's youth generation will grow up stealing mommy and daddy's credit card so they can play a couple of minutes with a cleavage-baring chick who doesn't give two tosses about them.
No kidding. It really goes to show how messed up society is that something like that exists. l learned about it from this youtube vid, The Lonely Fans of Onlyfans. Well, that and this vid talking about sites like Onlyfans capitalizing on male loneliness. That one was done by Sydney Watson, a rare example of an Aussie woman that isn't pozzed. She's alright. She's on conservative youtuber Elijah Schaeffer's podcast.
But yeah that e-pal site, it's just saddening because you just know there's loads of guys using it. At the least it's well known enough for youtubers of various sizes to make vids on it. Never would have heard of the site without the first 2 vids.
Another interesting thing to look into is the growing usage of sites like Replika.ai (a virtual bf/gf). Loads of lonely people out there looking for things to fill the void that should be filled by an actual relationship.
Oh! And then there's the guys (often rich) seeking emotional, sexual, relational fulfillment through sugaring, as Carl Benjamin and Callum discuss in this vid here.
I could go on about this stuff. On the one hand the way the sexes are interacting is interesting af to me, but otoh, it means having to keep ingesting all these blackpills lol
I love Callum's constant look of absolute disgust when they talk about anything related to thottery.
"Callum, what do you think about women on online dating sites?"
"Whores."
The article they read is pretty depressing too. The women are throwing away their opportunity of having a normal happy marriage one day, and the men, despite all their money and success, still have to resort to hiring someone (who hates them)
to listen to their idle musings.
You've probably seen it already, but here's a great interview between Stefan Molyneux and Tristan Tate on running a camgirl company:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DDUOJpk7FWQ/
I could go on about this stuff. On the one hand the way the sexes are interacting is interesting af to me, but otoh, it means having to keep ingesting all these blackpills lol
Oh I know EXACTLY what you mean.
The pathology behind all of this debilitating societal decay is a fascinating thing to study from the point of view of seeing how artificial structures to reorient human desires and persistence can be manipulated toward a wholly destructive end.
But at the same time, seeing how these institutions, structures, and manipulation through from an incomprehensibly well-organized zeitgeist is permanently ruining millions of lives and eroding away the potential happiness for multiple generations of people to come is both disheartening and frighteningly tragic.
Except it did arise from circumstance. Only Fans, Twitch, strip clubs and prostitution are all manifestations of biology, and no amount of social engineering is going to change that. There will always be lonely men with money who are willing to reward pretty young women for paying attention to them or spending time with them.
Attaching a social stigma to this behaviour again might help those men eventually find happiness in a stable relationship instead, but this phenomenon has been around as long as humanity has, and it's not going anywhere.
Technology makes it easier for us to do what comes naturally to us anyway. That's why we invent new technologies. The only way to stop technology from being used in that way is to abandon it completely.
Technology to do what OnlyFans does has existed for years.
The only thing that changed is a lot more people are locked inside watching women's propaganda 24/7 and the generation that grew up with third wave feminism are now reaching the age of consent.
This is way deeper and darker than people think. There have been decades of work to make this happen.
Your wholesale rejection of biology is reminiscent of something. Some other ideology, perhaps the very one you yourself obsessively criticize.
Men find women attractive and pay them for access to their attractiveness. Whether it's through a screen or on a pole or in bed, it's always been this way and it always will be. We certainly are living in a society that places fewer external restrictions on this behaviour than probably any other society in human history, and I agree it's not healthy, but it's also not a conspiracy. It's just biology, and you can't condition people out of it. You will never be able to engineer a society where some men are not willing to pay women for sex, virtually or otherwise.
The internet allowing you to sell your body anonymously without your social circles getting effected. Which meant instead of the lower class trashy women being the only ones who were in the market, because they didn't have any shame to feel, now attention starved idiots could have their cake and eat it too. They could feel like whores, and not have any of the downsides to it.
Onlyfans provided a much lazier model over the cam sites prior. The same way Patreon did for general subscription payments. A simple idea that no one managed to make big until it finally blew up.
How come we didn't have this problem before 2020, when everyone was forced to consume women's propaganda and cut off from their friends like an abusive partner would do?
How come it's only after a generation of children have grown up with third wave feminism that this biological necessity came about?
How come we didn't have this problem before 2020, when everyone was forced to consume women's propaganda and cut off from their friends like an abusive partner would do?
First of all, you supported the lockdown (as I did), so I'm not sure how you're going to blame this on the wahmen. I guess they control your thoughts and opinions like they control the rest of society.
Secondly, sure the lockdown helped, but what then?
How come it's only after a generation of children have grown up with third wave feminism that this biological necessity came about?
Apparently, many more men than women in their 20s are single. And that's indeed because of third wave feminism and the sexual revolution, which is why Victorianism is the answer.
I supported the lockdown at first, yes. But being stuck watching TV for a while made me realize just how dehumanizing it is towards men. I imagine being exposed to it for an extended period without the knowledge that these people hate you would severely damage someone.
To be fair, that "Are you over 18" pop up does fuck all to stop anyone underaged from going to a porn site. I don't think the porn video tube sites even ask.
At least OnlyFans forces you to cough up a credit card.
Screw your 'self-worth'. You're worthless, until you make something of yourself. You're owed nothing for sapping oxygen and stuffing your face with processed food. Coomers are worthless people.
Don't sabotage yourself and then ask me for sympathy, for I'm fresh out of it.
Talk about the racket. Tell everyone what it really is. The exploitation of broken men who are deliberately broken by a feminine culture from childhood.
Not this. This is bullshit. This gives them legitimacy.
Come on dude, you know they don't care.
They think those "losers" deserve being taken advantage of financially and emotionally, and are at the same time the evil oppressors forcing these poor innocent women to engage in sordid acts.
Yeah, I know. Anyone who would properly stand up against women would never be allowed to get into politics.
I just wish people stopped seeing OnlyFans as just porn. It's so much deeper and more insidious than that.
Hey, we agree for a change - and you agree with GC. It encourages women to ruin their futures for what is in nearly all cases peanuts.
No, I have zero sympathy for the garbage lying to everyone about how much they make.
I sincerely hope they get struck down by something painful and incurable, because that's what they deserve. And that's not a call to violence, because unlike feminists, I don't run a biolab in China.
What I mean is that they made a whole generation of kids hate themselves to make this racket function. None of it is by accident.
Most of them make close to nothing, while a small number rake in the cash. That is a tragedy for those who are groomed into this, like the women who say: "I'm glad I'm finally 18 so I can make my OF".
Your hatred for thots is disproportionate. Normal people regard them as a nuisance.
No one hates himself, except for virtue-signalers. Nor were those 20-year-old thots involved in 'making' 20-year-old coomers do anything.
Oh dear, it's part of The Genocide again, innit?
You're basing that on what exactly? What they tell you?
You don't think that being subjected to constant verbal attacks just for being born "wrong" would harm someone's mental state?
It's a universal law, that of the Black Swan, which was confirmed by the information that you gave me. If the average is a few thousand a month, while some make millions, then most are making peanuts for degrading themselves and ruining their futures.
I'm sure it harmed you, because you're fixated on it. The average man has no idea at all that some Twitter idiots say that men are trash. And frankly, if that harms you psychologically, then you deserve the harm.
If I said that women are trash, and some women were traumatized by that, my response would not be regret. It would be to laugh at them for being fragile.
That's one of the issues I have with sites like these — they've lowered the barriers to entry for young women, up to the point where they can ruin their entire lives with a few taps on their phone.
Even if their promises of untold riches were true (and most people here know that it's only the top x% making bank), these women aren't being made aware of the permanent and irreversible consequences that this will have.
WhenIf they have any regrets in 10 years time, there is no undo button. But when you are young and impressionable, no one thinks that far ahead.Yes, they are adults and they should be allowed to make their own decisions in life, but I do not agree with a system that encourages young women to become digital prostitutes, whilst painting over the stigma with a coat of 'sexual liberation'.
And being young and impressionable, even if they do strike gold and make millions, they're not going to invest it wisely. They're going to buy Louis Vutton bags and live life to the fullest and be utterly destitute by the time their time runs out.
What a great culture modernity created.
Oh come on, I was backing you at first, but you can't seriously consider these evil pieces of shit victims of anything.
You said it yourself what's going on.
I know you dislike women, and so I'm curious: what is your opinion on companies that encourage young women into becoming online prostitutes?
Those women are just as much victims of the cosmopolitan hedonism pushed by corporate propaganda as the men. If these women were saturated in a culture that told them the loss of chastity would make them depraved and truthfully portrayed the sad mess that is the childless woman, these girls would desire nothing more than to support a healthy family under a strong patriarch, which is already their natural inclination that is heavily suppressed. You can't blame the cattle for eating the grass placed in front of them.
A fool and his money are soon parted. Coomers are not victims.
I agree they're not victims, and that they're voluntarily purchasing these services.
But it still bugs me in the same way I get bugged by televangelists take advantage of desperate people, people selling homeopathic medicine for serious ailments, or shady loan sharks preying upon debt-ridden people.
I don't think OnlyFans should be banned, because that's a slippery slope to head down, but I do think that sites like these which are based upon allowing the customer to engage with the performer, will lead towards more serious issues down the line, in way that is way worse than say, strip clubs or brothels.
You can't blame the cattle for eating grass. The majority of people are victims of cosmopolitan hedonism pushed by corporate propaganda.
I agree with you 100% about western society being deeply, violently anti-male and encouraging boys to either become consoomer drones or kill themselves.
But all throughout human history, low tier men have been m'lady-defending sycophants who are desperate for female validation. It's even in the bible. Hell, people talk about 1920s America as if it was legal for a husband to shove his wife into a wood chipper if she spoke back to him, yet this is the same generation that decided women should get all the privileges of democracy without the consequences of having to defend it.
At very, very few points in human history have women not been placed on a pedestal and worshiped as demigods. It's human nature. More specifically, it's the nature of men who have nothing to offer the world.
Misandry should be exposed and attacked at every opportunity, but so should simping. If men who subscribe to an onlyfans were universally reviled as the garbage they are, you'd see it happen less often. Being an onlyfans simp should be treated the same as being an animal abuser. It's morally reprehensible.
Look, I have zero respect for thots.
But let's be honest. You only care about this way of people self-medicating in unhealthy ways because it involves women. Again, sex work is not work, whores are whores, I don't fucking support that.
But you are buttmad because of pussy again.
Meanwhile, people also become addicted to everything from cigarettes, to fast food, to vidya, to Twitter, to everything and those ain't a problem because you haven't found the magical connection to women YET.
Pretty sure the average OnlyFans thot is not even aware of this alleged 'psychological damage' you keep screaming about.
I mean, your argument doesn't even make sense. Assuming arguendo that this 'psychological damage' exists (which is self-inflicted in your case, by the way), you suggest that they are only allowed to 'profit' off of those who were damaged by men, and not women.
I'll make this argument as simple as I possibly can so that you can understand where I'm coming from.
I somehow become President and declare feminists subhuman and deserving of all that happens to them.
After a while of this, I then issue a statement that if they donate to my re-election campaign, I will stop considering them subhuman.
Do you understand now?
No, that's even more of a mess. A proper comparison would be to claim that the 'patriarchy' teaches girls to hate themselves, so... they pay you to shove objects in your anus and film it with your OnlyFans account.
Makes little sense.
What I'm trying to say is that OnlyFans is just women profiting off the fact that other women put in a lot of work to break the self-esteem of little boys for them to exploit.
You see those little boys who act like girls because their mom wanted them to, right? You must understand the concept of conditioning that they are using to make this work. It's the same one as transgenderism but a different outcome.
Yes, I know that part, but it makes little sense. So it would be OK with you if it was men who were doing that, but because - you claim - it's women, it's bad?
Also, the self-esteem movement is cringe, as are you.
No, they just believed your stories of female privilege. I'm sure of it. Also, the boys aren't nearly as damaged as the girls as they usually don't amputate body parts.
Yes, all the girls who want to have a masectomy because their dad wanted a son.
I'm saying that it was co-ordinated deliberately to produce an outcome like this.
They get their genitals cut off.
You're just being contrarian now.
So you're an unprincipled realpolitiking hypocrite?
No, I'd always consider them subhuman.
So as I said, you're an unprincipled realpolitiking hypocrite.
Says one thing, does another.
But I'm not, because I wouldn't offer that compromise. I was merely trying to explain how the con works.
There's no point going after Onlyfans. Onlyfans is a symptom, not the underlying issue. You shut down Onlyfans, they are all on another site before the end of the week.
The underlying issue is communists in academia, communists in media, communists in corporations, and communists in government.
Nothing less than an ultraviolence purge will fix it.
And it isn't going to happen.
It's the breakdown of lifelong monogamy, not phantom 'communists', who caused this issue. Robert Wright, not known for being based, spells it out pretty well in The Moral Animal, which surprised me greatly.
Who do you think caused the breakdown of monogamy!?
It's been an explicit, open target of communists in the west for over a century!
They admit it openly in their books!
The invention of fairly reliable contraception.
I doubt it. Marx wrote about how he wanted to break down the family, but this was removed from the final version, as communism back then was more popular than destroying the family. The reason for that was not what we are talking about here, but because families are a stronger unit against a potentially tyrannical state.
"Ukrainian-American businessman Leonid Radvinsky, owner of MyFreeCams, acquired 75% ownership of Fenix International Limited and became its director. After this, OnlyFans became increasingly focused on not safe for work (NSFW) content and 'gained a pop culture reputation for being a hive of pornography'"
It seems like the reason that OnlyFans exists is similar to much of the rest of the pornography industry.
Eh, attacking OF itself is a pointless endeavor. Say it closes down, then the thots and simps merely go somewhere else. And ofc there's other things online that play off the same psychological mechanisms that onlyfans does: Epal (users pay for women to play vidya with them, formerly e-girl.gg), twitch streamers, vtubers, and probably many more I don't know about. Onlyfans and their ilk are all symptoms of greater social ills.
If someone really wanted to put a stop to OF then you'd have to go further upstream to the societal problems creating the masses of lonely people using these services. None of those would be the lucrative cash-cows they are otherwise.
Wow, that.... that's a new kind of pathetic. Exploiting the loneliness of young males to get them to pay thots to play games with them?
Back in my day we used to meet people and make friends at arcades. Barring that, we used to have this little thing that only Nintendo seems to respect these days called split-screen, where you would invite people over to play within proximity of one another.
But sadly today's youth generation will grow up stealing mommy and daddy's credit card so they can play a couple of minutes with a cleavage-baring chick who doesn't give two tosses about them.
Talk about an unexpected black pill.
I miss the times when joking about having to pay people to (pretend to) be your friend was just a joke.
No kidding. It really goes to show how messed up society is that something like that exists. l learned about it from this youtube vid, The Lonely Fans of Onlyfans. Well, that and this vid talking about sites like Onlyfans capitalizing on male loneliness. That one was done by Sydney Watson, a rare example of an Aussie woman that isn't pozzed. She's alright. She's on conservative youtuber Elijah Schaeffer's podcast.
But yeah that e-pal site, it's just saddening because you just know there's loads of guys using it. At the least it's well known enough for youtubers of various sizes to make vids on it. Never would have heard of the site without the first 2 vids.
Another interesting thing to look into is the growing usage of sites like Replika.ai (a virtual bf/gf). Loads of lonely people out there looking for things to fill the void that should be filled by an actual relationship.
Oh! And then there's the guys (often rich) seeking emotional, sexual, relational fulfillment through sugaring, as Carl Benjamin and Callum discuss in this vid here.
I could go on about this stuff. On the one hand the way the sexes are interacting is interesting af to me, but otoh, it means having to keep ingesting all these blackpills lol
I love Callum's constant look of absolute disgust when they talk about anything related to thottery.
The article they read is pretty depressing too. The women are throwing away their opportunity of having a normal happy marriage one day, and the men, despite all their money and success, still have to resort to hiring someone (who hates them) to listen to their idle musings.
You've probably seen it already, but here's a great interview between Stefan Molyneux and Tristan Tate on running a camgirl company: https://www.bitchute.com/video/DDUOJpk7FWQ/
Why blame the whole of society when only one half is evil enough to exploit people like this?
Oh I know EXACTLY what you mean.
The pathology behind all of this debilitating societal decay is a fascinating thing to study from the point of view of seeing how artificial structures to reorient human desires and persistence can be manipulated toward a wholly destructive end.
But at the same time, seeing how these institutions, structures, and manipulation through from an incomprehensibly well-organized zeitgeist is permanently ruining millions of lives and eroding away the potential happiness for multiple generations of people to come is both disheartening and frighteningly tragic.
Ban it and remove women from the education system permanently.
Problem solved.
If we understand that all of this is deliberate and not simply something that arose from the circumstances, we could fix a lot.
Except it did arise from circumstance. Only Fans, Twitch, strip clubs and prostitution are all manifestations of biology, and no amount of social engineering is going to change that. There will always be lonely men with money who are willing to reward pretty young women for paying attention to them or spending time with them.
Attaching a social stigma to this behaviour again might help those men eventually find happiness in a stable relationship instead, but this phenomenon has been around as long as humanity has, and it's not going anywhere.
So how come they didn't exist before?
Strip clubs and hookers did, but OnlyFans is a very, very recent one.
What changed? What made it suddenly palatable? You're fooling yourself if you believe that it's a natural progression.
"Houston, my sides are in orbit."
Technology makes it easier for us to do what comes naturally to us anyway. That's why we invent new technologies. The only way to stop technology from being used in that way is to abandon it completely.
Technology to do what OnlyFans does has existed for years.
The only thing that changed is a lot more people are locked inside watching women's propaganda 24/7 and the generation that grew up with third wave feminism are now reaching the age of consent.
This is way deeper and darker than people think. There have been decades of work to make this happen.
Your wholesale rejection of biology is reminiscent of something. Some other ideology, perhaps the very one you yourself obsessively criticize.
Men find women attractive and pay them for access to their attractiveness. Whether it's through a screen or on a pole or in bed, it's always been this way and it always will be. We certainly are living in a society that places fewer external restrictions on this behaviour than probably any other society in human history, and I agree it's not healthy, but it's also not a conspiracy. It's just biology, and you can't condition people out of it. You will never be able to engineer a society where some men are not willing to pay women for sex, virtually or otherwise.
The internet allowing you to sell your body anonymously without your social circles getting effected. Which meant instead of the lower class trashy women being the only ones who were in the market, because they didn't have any shame to feel, now attention starved idiots could have their cake and eat it too. They could feel like whores, and not have any of the downsides to it.
Onlyfans provided a much lazier model over the cam sites prior. The same way Patreon did for general subscription payments. A simple idea that no one managed to make big until it finally blew up.
How come the Romans did not have internet streaming services with pornography?
How come we didn't have this problem before 2020, when everyone was forced to consume women's propaganda and cut off from their friends like an abusive partner would do?
How come it's only after a generation of children have grown up with third wave feminism that this biological necessity came about?
First of all, you supported the lockdown (as I did), so I'm not sure how you're going to blame this on the wahmen. I guess they control your thoughts and opinions like they control the rest of society.
Secondly, sure the lockdown helped, but what then?
Apparently, many more men than women in their 20s are single. And that's indeed because of third wave feminism and the sexual revolution, which is why Victorianism is the answer.
I supported the lockdown at first, yes. But being stuck watching TV for a while made me realize just how dehumanizing it is towards men. I imagine being exposed to it for an extended period without the knowledge that these people hate you would severely damage someone.
Attacking OnlyFans is a waste of time.
Instead, we should be working to revoke the 19th amendment.
WE SHOULD FOCUS ALL OUR EFFORTS TILTING AT WINDMILLS!
You won't get a free pic for defending them.
That's like telling someone "Don't be an alcoholic."
They're addicted to the faux relationship dynamic.
True, but until we have organizations that address OF like alcoholism, we can't really work on it the same way.
They just lump it in with "porn addiction", which isn't a thing.
The addiction is to the validation from the woman, that you mean something to someone.
To be fair, that "Are you over 18" pop up does fuck all to stop anyone underaged from going to a porn site. I don't think the porn video tube sites even ask.
At least OnlyFans forces you to cough up a credit card.
Thots gonna thot. you can either blame them for you problems like a marxist, or you can take control of your own life.
Yeah, the children should just pick up their broken self-worth by the bootstraps.
You're like the leftist meme of a right-winger.
Screw your 'self-worth'. You're worthless, until you make something of yourself. You're owed nothing for sapping oxygen and stuffing your face with processed food. Coomers are worthless people.
Don't sabotage yourself and then ask me for sympathy, for I'm fresh out of it.
You're talking like I'm one of them. Who are you yelling at?
Replying to you. Not talking about you.