When you call yourself a 'fact checker', you can lie brazenly and no one will call you out on it. I've encountered morons who confidently tell me that I should look at what FACT CHECKERS have said about a given subject.
Ah, if they call themselves that, the description must be accurate.
...and then i go back and watch "because you'd be in jail" for the 10,000th time and realize that mad cow was already trying to push "fact checkers" back then.
Clearly the left and media are in bed together and have been for a long time. Not just mere bias but outright "we will lie and blatantly spin anything for you."
We know how useless the vaccines are, I wonder if there has been any study of how large - or, as we expect, little - the reinfection rate is for those who never took the vaccine.
For example, is there any reason to believe the Wuhan Flu's natural immunity won't mirror the 18 years (and ongoing) of those who were infected with SARS?
"Present your vaccine card, or we are not letting you in. I don't care if you've been infected before."
"This is for your health."
These two statements are contradictory. My immunity thanks to a previous infection is more important than the vaccine I get. End of. If it were about health, they'd make exceptions for people who've already been infected. Period.
I wonder if there has been any study of how large - or, as we expect, little - the reinfection rate is for those who never took the vaccine.
If there are, it will end up like the transgender studies. Anything that runs counter to the narrative will either be self-censored or rejected by publishers such that if any studies are published they will be the ones that show significant rates of reinfection.
They will then proceed to lecture us about how literally all of the studies show this, as if it's a meaningful statistic when studies showing the contrary are discarded.
There is no possibility of an effective vaccine for wuflu. Not only is it a coronavirus like the common cold that there has never been a vaccine for, it has an animal reservoir. A vaccine will never stamp it out.
Build a strong immune system, use medicine when that fails. No problem!
When you call yourself a 'fact checker', you can lie brazenly and no one will call you out on it. I've encountered morons who confidently tell me that I should look at what FACT CHECKERS have said about a given subject.
Ah, if they call themselves that, the description must be accurate.
...and then i go back and watch "because you'd be in jail" for the 10,000th time and realize that mad cow was already trying to push "fact checkers" back then.
Clearly the left and media are in bed together and have been for a long time. Not just mere bias but outright "we will lie and blatantly spin anything for you."
We need to get past "calling it out" and move forward to "punishment for lying".
The best part is that they don't even have credentialism to fall back on.
I'm as legitimate of a "Fact-Checker" as any of them.
We know how useless the vaccines are, I wonder if there has been any study of how large - or, as we expect, little - the reinfection rate is for those who never took the vaccine.
For example, is there any reason to believe the Wuhan Flu's natural immunity won't mirror the 18 years (and ongoing) of those who were infected with SARS?
The best part are the insane restrictions.
"Present your vaccine card, or we are not letting you in. I don't care if you've been infected before."
"This is for your health."
These two statements are contradictory. My immunity thanks to a previous infection is more important than the vaccine I get. End of. If it were about health, they'd make exceptions for people who've already been infected. Period.
If there are, it will end up like the transgender studies. Anything that runs counter to the narrative will either be self-censored or rejected by publishers such that if any studies are published they will be the ones that show significant rates of reinfection.
They will then proceed to lecture us about how literally all of the studies show this, as if it's a meaningful statistic when studies showing the contrary are discarded.
I fucking love Science™!
There is no possibility of an effective vaccine for wuflu. Not only is it a coronavirus like the common cold that there has never been a vaccine for, it has an animal reservoir. A vaccine will never stamp it out.
Build a strong immune system, use medicine when that fails. No problem!
The world knows it came from Wuhan. You fool no one.
Don't feed the troll, they weren't actually effectively debunking anything you said anyway.
Yeah that guy's a troll with a vengeance! I wonder who deleted that comment?
Racist virus kills Blax disproportionately over the whitey, also currently ravages Israel.
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
The only reason natural immunity would be variable or not long lasting is because the virus is so rapidly adaptable.
WHICH IS THE SAME REASON THE VACCINE'S PROTECTION IS VARIABLE AND NOT LONG LASTING
It is at least 7x better than the vaccine.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/watch-rand-paul-blasts-biden-health-secretary-arrogance-coupled-authoritarianism-unseemly
There are some people who got spanish flu in 1918 and their antibodies were still detectable 100 years later...