I agree with you in principle, but I'm not sure that attitude is helping in the culture war, or doing anything to stop anti-white racism.
There's something to be said about pedigree, your "stock". It's one of the most important elements of successful culture.
The "other side" is absolutely using their race to unite on tribal lines and conspire against you. By denying you the same privilege, they show that they hold power over you.
The only way civic nationalism works is if you can marginalize people who use racial pride entirely, and force their side to stop doing it. Yet for decades Black Pride, Asian Pride, La Raza have been celebrated and White pride shamed. We're seeing the results of that now. Woke culture is rolling off a cliff in the opposite direction away from civic nationalism and towards genocide, in part because one side has surrendered and thinks they're taking the high road.
your "stock" has a lot more nuance than just your skin color.
never become your enemy. Even if you "win" your culture war, it's all the same to me if one racial authoritarian is replaced with another. The enemy is racial authoritarianism itself.
It is okay to be any race. Having pride or shame for your race is antithetical to liberty. Having shame or pride in one's heritage is another matter, and should not be lobbed in with mindless skin color wars.
I think you're confused about what antithetical and liberty mean. if you think you're not feel free to explain how having pride in your ancestry and their accomplishments is as you say "antithetical to liberty"
you are the only one injecting authoritarianism into the argument so that you can believe that you have half a leg to stand on.
Ancestry is a much more specific trait than race. To have pride in one's ancestry is to have pride in one's on familial history and heritage.
To have pride in one's race is to hold said race above others, which strips people of their individuality and replaces it with a collectivist view. This collectivism inevitably leads to oppression, no matter what "side" you are on.
It's Okay to be White, because being white is neither good nor bad.
Your average whites and asians are objectively superior to the average black in pretty much every way.
This is a banned opinion and will almost certainly be removed, and yet those blacks harassing whites and advocating black supremacy will never face consequences for their speech.
Blacks are a protected class, whites are a targeted class.
When you don't have much going for you, you try to pretend that you're better because you're white, or black, or because of your unquestioning faith in the ear-deafening propaganda coming from the establishment.
why is it stupid to be proud of your peoples history and their achievements? they are your kin, in a way, and just like a father, brother, uncle can and should be proud of the achievements of their close kin, so you should be proud of the greater family you are part of.
that lack of ingroup loyalty, faith and love is the fucking problem with the west.
that lack of feeling connected enables outsiders to come in and subvert and take over western societies.
It’s like being proud that you are left handed. It’s not something you had any part of achieving so taking pride in it is stupid. And it seems there are a lot of people new to Kia2 thinking not being proud of some stupid uncontrollable trait also means to be ashamed of some stupid uncontrollable trait. It doesn’t.
"My dad gave me his classic car when I turned 16, but since I didn't pay for it I shouldn't be proud of it." - You, a retard that takes no pride in his culture and the achievements of his forefathers
being white just is. it is neither better nor worse. same with being black, brown, purple, w/e. finding worth or sin in skincolor is dumb.
I agree with you in principle, but I'm not sure that attitude is helping in the culture war, or doing anything to stop anti-white racism.
There's something to be said about pedigree, your "stock". It's one of the most important elements of successful culture.
The "other side" is absolutely using their race to unite on tribal lines and conspire against you. By denying you the same privilege, they show that they hold power over you.
The only way civic nationalism works is if you can marginalize people who use racial pride entirely, and force their side to stop doing it. Yet for decades Black Pride, Asian Pride, La Raza have been celebrated and White pride shamed. We're seeing the results of that now. Woke culture is rolling off a cliff in the opposite direction away from civic nationalism and towards genocide, in part because one side has surrendered and thinks they're taking the high road.
It is okay to be any race. Having pride or shame for your race is antithetical to liberty. Having shame or pride in one's heritage is another matter, and should not be lobbed in with mindless skin color wars.
I think you're confused about what antithetical and liberty mean. if you think you're not feel free to explain how having pride in your ancestry and their accomplishments is as you say "antithetical to liberty"
you are the only one injecting authoritarianism into the argument so that you can believe that you have half a leg to stand on.
Ancestry is a much more specific trait than race. To have pride in one's ancestry is to have pride in one's on familial history and heritage.
To have pride in one's race is to hold said race above others, which strips people of their individuality and replaces it with a collectivist view. This collectivism inevitably leads to oppression, no matter what "side" you are on.
It's Okay to be White, because being white is neither good nor bad.
Your average whites and asians are objectively superior to the average black in pretty much every way.
This is a banned opinion and will almost certainly be removed, and yet those blacks harassing whites and advocating black supremacy will never face consequences for their speech.
Blacks are a protected class, whites are a targeted class.
"whites" and "asians" have so many subgroups that the worth of such broad categories is diluted.
Except my statement holds true for pretty much all of those groups.
based
When you don't have much going for you, you try to pretend that you're better because you're white, or black, or because of your unquestioning faith in the ear-deafening propaganda coming from the establishment.
My ancestors lived in a hot climate!
Yeah? Well mine live in a cold climate!
you think thats the only difference between the races?
No. I never said that.
I'm merely saying that being proud of the fact that you happened to be born black or white is stupid.
why is it stupid to be proud of your peoples history and their achievements? they are your kin, in a way, and just like a father, brother, uncle can and should be proud of the achievements of their close kin, so you should be proud of the greater family you are part of.
that lack of ingroup loyalty, faith and love is the fucking problem with the west.
that lack of feeling connected enables outsiders to come in and subvert and take over western societies.
It’s like being proud that you are left handed. It’s not something you had any part of achieving so taking pride in it is stupid. And it seems there are a lot of people new to Kia2 thinking not being proud of some stupid uncontrollable trait also means to be ashamed of some stupid uncontrollable trait. It doesn’t.
"My dad gave me his classic car when I turned 16, but since I didn't pay for it I shouldn't be proud of it." - You, a retard that takes no pride in his culture and the achievements of his forefathers