At his latest trial in 2021, Samsudeen claimed his internet searches and videos were not evidence he supported Islamic State. Some videos included a soldier killing a civilian, a soldier killing a 13-year-old child, and people being bound and burnt.
But didn't they actually jail someone for possessing the Christchurch video?
Leftists can't be wrong by their own concept, it would mean rejecting the narrative that they base their conquest on.
The only acceptable way to be "wrong" is to completely reverse your position, tell everyone that you never changed your position, and anyone who opposes the new position is reactionary.
It's like when Mao declared he was a rightist during his own party meeting.
Prior to the Auckland supermarket attack, Samsudeen was being watched by New Zealand police 24 hours a day after High Court ruled that he could not be jailed for planning an earlier, foiled terrorist attack.
I just honestly can't understand this. You flee an area that was horrible, people fleeing bad areas is nothing new in history. Hell, early america was a bunch of religious extremists fleeing places that they felt uncomfortable in. And then... they integrated and produced value for the new country they were thankful for.
And that's why your understanding immediately fails. They are not 'fleeing'. They are seizing opportunity. They see a weak civilization run by gullible idiots.
He was the reason that area was horrible. That's why all the countries that welcome these migrants slowly turn into the same shitholes: it's not the land, it's the people.
I know plenty of retards that came out of Special Ed and get jobs at Walmart and Home Depot, struggling to try and support themselves with minimal state intervention. They are good people. I've yet to find one that shot-up a school or became a suicide bomber.
Do not remove the agency of terrorists and excuse immoral behavior. Islam is a violent, brutal, supremacist, authoritarian religion that manifests a culture that reflects it.
See, as a not-racist, I tend not to keep track of such things. It's not at the forefront of my mind, and it's certainly not an area of conversation I intend to interrogate them on. I don't know how 'mongrel' they were to meet with your approval. I don't know if they were "fully" white or "3/4ths black". Moreover, whatever 'racial signifiers' you are expecting, they don't appear on people who are so actually retarded they can't operate under normal conditions.
But whatever, keep pretending Islam isn't a problem as long as they are white Muslims.
I'm not awful, I'm just more in tune with reality than you.
I notice how you didn't answer the question. Were these successful retards white, or non-white? Or, are you too afraid to engage with that idea?
I never said white muslims are okay either. That's all you, baby. Muslims aren't white unless they're white converts.
Idiots like you who outright refuse to acknowledge racial difference in spite of all the mountains of evidence make it so that fixing any major societal problem is impossible.
We can't rally around a nation if the nation is constantly undermined. A nation is a race. By denying that you deny yourself, your ancestors, and your children.
What people like you don't understand is that by forcing this ridiculous multiracial, multiethnic idea of a nation you're sentencing the old nation to death and forcing everyone into a slow but violent collapse. Look around you.
In every western country there are now we have multiple nations vying for dominance. The architects of these nations, the White Christians, are the only group disallowed from in group preference and racial preference.
Now you see the result of, as the talk show hosts call it, "the inevitable browning of America." All our cultural institutions will be undermined in order to create this new muddled slave caste.
And people like you will lap it up because racism bad mmmkay?
I know the royal family was known for inbreeding. I just don't know the exact number. I'm not disputing that it's true though. I'm saying look at the two societies and spot the difference. One has 65% of the population inbreeding, while the other has like 1% or less of the population inbreeding.
They hate you and want you to die instead of admitting they were wrong.
But didn't they actually jail someone for possessing the Christchurch video?
Leftists can't be wrong by their own concept, it would mean rejecting the narrative that they base their conquest on.
The only acceptable way to be "wrong" is to completely reverse your position, tell everyone that you never changed your position, and anyone who opposes the new position is reactionary.
It's like when Mao declared he was a rightist during his own party meeting.
It's almost as if being a communist is the best way of realizing your dreams of being a fascist dictator. 🤔
The biggest real differences are in aesthetics:
Dress like a shmuck with no cape: Communist
Cape & cool hat: Fascist
Suit & Tie: Red Fascist
Then the High Court is just as guilty as he is. Remember when the time comes
Gangstalking is real
The things that never happen never stop happening.
This is really inconvenient.
I just honestly can't understand this. You flee an area that was horrible, people fleeing bad areas is nothing new in history. Hell, early america was a bunch of religious extremists fleeing places that they felt uncomfortable in. And then... they integrated and produced value for the new country they were thankful for.
And that's why your understanding immediately fails. They are not 'fleeing'. They are seizing opportunity. They see a weak civilization run by gullible idiots.
It is Jihad.
They are invaders, and they should be treated as such.
No.
Invaders.
Soldiers on a mission.
Do not play their word games.
He was the reason that area was horrible. That's why all the countries that welcome these migrants slowly turn into the same shitholes: it's not the land, it's the people.
He was a Muslim from Sri Lanka. The place was a hellhole due to a conflict between Buddhists and Hinduists (ethnic lines as well).
Come on Bryce, there are a lot more important things than Sri Lanka
"Bryce"?
It’s you! You’re the American Psycho!
I'll help simplify it for you then.
These people are evil.
That's because you are trying to view them as rational people. They are neither.
Most of them have an IQ in the 60-70 range. Too much inbreeding. It's pointless trying to understand their thought process.
That's a bullshit excuse.
I know plenty of retards that came out of Special Ed and get jobs at Walmart and Home Depot, struggling to try and support themselves with minimal state intervention. They are good people. I've yet to find one that shot-up a school or became a suicide bomber.
Do not remove the agency of terrorists and excuse immoral behavior. Islam is a violent, brutal, supremacist, authoritarian religion that manifests a culture that reflects it.
What was their race?
I never really asked... jesus, you're awful.
See, as a not-racist, I tend not to keep track of such things. It's not at the forefront of my mind, and it's certainly not an area of conversation I intend to interrogate them on. I don't know how 'mongrel' they were to meet with your approval. I don't know if they were "fully" white or "3/4ths black". Moreover, whatever 'racial signifiers' you are expecting, they don't appear on people who are so actually retarded they can't operate under normal conditions.
But whatever, keep pretending Islam isn't a problem as long as they are white Muslims.
I'm not awful, I'm just more in tune with reality than you.
I notice how you didn't answer the question. Were these successful retards white, or non-white? Or, are you too afraid to engage with that idea?
I never said white muslims are okay either. That's all you, baby. Muslims aren't white unless they're white converts.
Idiots like you who outright refuse to acknowledge racial difference in spite of all the mountains of evidence make it so that fixing any major societal problem is impossible.
We can't rally around a nation if the nation is constantly undermined. A nation is a race. By denying that you deny yourself, your ancestors, and your children.
What people like you don't understand is that by forcing this ridiculous multiracial, multiethnic idea of a nation you're sentencing the old nation to death and forcing everyone into a slow but violent collapse. Look around you.
In every western country there are now we have multiple nations vying for dominance. The architects of these nations, the White Christians, are the only group disallowed from in group preference and racial preference.
Now you see the result of, as the talk show hosts call it, "the inevitable browning of America." All our cultural institutions will be undermined in order to create this new muddled slave caste.
And people like you will lap it up because racism bad mmmkay?
Fear has consumed you.
A few royal families compared to 65% of the population living in the middle east is a pretty big difference.
The royal family are heads of state but have no say in the day to day operation of the government.
Even if they are as inbred as you're claiming, they managed to build the biggest empire this world has ever seen so they can't be that stupid.
I know the royal family was known for inbreeding. I just don't know the exact number. I'm not disputing that it's true though. I'm saying look at the two societies and spot the difference. One has 65% of the population inbreeding, while the other has like 1% or less of the population inbreeding.
And it's pointless trying to understand the thought process of pozzed retards such as the British Royal family.
New Zealand is retard land.
They vetted him so thoroughly for his sheepleness, but forgot to check for Islam.
Honestly, if he were a sheep-fucker, it could have calmed him down a bit to come to New Zealand.