White = anyone who opposes any aspect of the globalist/leftist agenda, and each member group of the globohomo coalition defines their enemy differently. That’s why “white” means half a dozen wildly different things.
It's just used as a synonym for "bad" at this point.
And I'm sure if and when white people start getting publicly beaten and killed across the country solely because of the colour of their skin these self-same academics will do the pikachu face thing. How could this possibly happen?
It mirrors the way POC is treated now, albeit imperfectly. Back then white meant the ingroup, so groups like the Irish weren't considered white because they were in the outgroup. Now POC is the ingroup and white is the outgroup, so it's POC status that's changing, with white mirroring the change. The difference now is it changes on a near daily basis depending on what's necessary for the agenda. Asians, Jews, and Indians (south Asia Indians) are the groups that have their POC status granted and revoked the most depending on whether they want to demonize the group in question or try to enlist them against whites. Hispanics also occasionally get a taste of the POC game, usually the ones who have first and second hand knowledge about what Castro did. When the proportion of Hispanics who voted for Trump in November was larger than expected some retard on Twatter was trying to explain why they're actually white. Hell, even black men get in on the game, albeit very rarely. I remember an article a while black saying black men are the white men of the black community.
Whites voluntarily abandoned their in-group bias because they were told everyone else was going to do the same. That’s what the colorblindness of the 90s was all about: fooling whitey into dropping his racial consciousness and embracing a post-racial society.
Now every other racial demo has joined together to attack the defenseless whites, conquering their nations and looting their treasuries with little or no resistance. Any attempt by whites to mount even the slightest defense of themselves, their cultures, or their homelands is universally derided as pure evil.
Europeans used to fight/compete with each other, hence othering them calling them non-white, when they just meant not an acceptable European group and now we fight/compete more with non-European, actual non-whites who are literally so. Doesn't mean they are White or will be considered to be (though white Hispanics could be a problem adding in more and more lower IQ admixture). But yeah, this is brought up a lot like it's more proof races don't exist. Not so, just shows the changing face of immigration and conflict.
Places like bars, pubs, and anonymous message boards are where people open up and you can actually learn the truth about society and culture, much more than in stuffy academia where people are unpersoned for having unorthodox opinions. It can be unpleasant at times. Uncontrolled spaces draw out the dregs of society, jerks, trolls, and people that will hate you for no good reason, but those people are out there anyway - they don't change their mind if we control their speech. Communicating only in censored safe spaces gives us a false impression of the world. I'd rather have the truth. If I find comradery with other like-minded people in those forums, even better.
Exactly. If a white person has a problem with black ppl id rather have an honest conversation. I have plenty of white friends in rural areas (born in Oklahoma and live in Texas now) who the media would consider evil racists but we took the time to get to know each other. M
But I’d say that about any race man or woman. I’d rather have honest discussions
We can just do some simple deduction, "white" is a label, and for it to exist there has to have been a reason for a distinction that is in contrast to "white". In other words, probably nobody in medieval Europe was calling each other "white". The label came about from America and the need to distinguish between Africans (at the time) and Anglo-saxon colonists who later revolted against the rule of England.
Therefore strictly speaking white people are the direct descendants of English people, just like black people should be the direct descendants of the African slaves of the time. Everything past that became extensions to BOTH "races", which means any immigrant arriving to America at first would not identify as either. This includes Africans like Nigerians, many of which I have personally spoken with and told me they didn't identify as "black", and also other Europeans who would arrive and would experience a couple generations before being considered "white". This is especially true of southern Europeans that are already a very mixed group of people dating back tot he Roman Empire.
Now the terms have been changed beyond recognition, and is just a reference to light or dark skin tones, plus some CRT bullshit having to do with being oppressor or oppressed. Sadly everyone is somewhat embracing these terms anyway, and as usual, the Left has changed language and everyone is just jumping on board and using the new terms instead of pushing back or countering with better terminology.
Progressives actually tried to abolish the terms "white" and "black" in the 90s. We thought we had won a victory against political correctness when we kept these terms. How wrong we were.
Imagine the leftists of today attempting to directly attack "European Americans". It simply wouldn't work. Too overtly racist. And try telling Europeans that they have no culture.
Oh wow. This idea was pushed around in the late 00's as true until a high schooler googled it and found proof Irish and others were not considered white or equals to others. It goes right up there with Shakespeare not existing even though we have records of his plays, his death and birth records and many people talking him when he was alive.
It's only believed by upper class idiots who want to sound smart and their students who don't know better.
You will of course recall that dramatic scene in Gone with the Wind when Scarlett O'Hara's Irish surname is discovered, causing her to be immediately sold into slavery.
White = conservative
White = middle class
White = nationalist
White = white
White = anyone who opposes any aspect of the globalist/leftist agenda, and each member group of the globohomo coalition defines their enemy differently. That’s why “white” means half a dozen wildly different things.
It's just used as a synonym for "bad" at this point.
And I'm sure if and when white people start getting publicly beaten and killed across the country solely because of the colour of their skin these self-same academics will do the pikachu face thing. How could this possibly happen?
That's already happening. News media simply ignores it, and that's that.
What do you mean if or when? Dude
It mirrors the way POC is treated now, albeit imperfectly. Back then white meant the ingroup, so groups like the Irish weren't considered white because they were in the outgroup. Now POC is the ingroup and white is the outgroup, so it's POC status that's changing, with white mirroring the change. The difference now is it changes on a near daily basis depending on what's necessary for the agenda. Asians, Jews, and Indians (south Asia Indians) are the groups that have their POC status granted and revoked the most depending on whether they want to demonize the group in question or try to enlist them against whites. Hispanics also occasionally get a taste of the POC game, usually the ones who have first and second hand knowledge about what Castro did. When the proportion of Hispanics who voted for Trump in November was larger than expected some retard on Twatter was trying to explain why they're actually white. Hell, even black men get in on the game, albeit very rarely. I remember an article a while black saying black men are the white men of the black community.
A keen insight. I think we've lost the very notion of an in-group, which is part of why everything has gone to shit.
Whites voluntarily abandoned their in-group bias because they were told everyone else was going to do the same. That’s what the colorblindness of the 90s was all about: fooling whitey into dropping his racial consciousness and embracing a post-racial society.
Now every other racial demo has joined together to attack the defenseless whites, conquering their nations and looting their treasuries with little or no resistance. Any attempt by whites to mount even the slightest defense of themselves, their cultures, or their homelands is universally derided as pure evil.
Bingo.
People of color is code for everyone who is not European.
We are not defenseless. We are the most successful warriors the world has ever seen.
Europeans used to fight/compete with each other, hence othering them calling them non-white, when they just meant not an acceptable European group and now we fight/compete more with non-European, actual non-whites who are literally so. Doesn't mean they are White or will be considered to be (though white Hispanics could be a problem adding in more and more lower IQ admixture). But yeah, this is brought up a lot like it's more proof races don't exist. Not so, just shows the changing face of immigration and conflict.
I’m black and I’ve been called a white supremacist. Granted I have a little European ancestry though most of that is English/Irish.
Sounds good to me. There are a lot of good people on here. And I do like honest opinions. And you get plenty of that here.
Places like bars, pubs, and anonymous message boards are where people open up and you can actually learn the truth about society and culture, much more than in stuffy academia where people are unpersoned for having unorthodox opinions. It can be unpleasant at times. Uncontrolled spaces draw out the dregs of society, jerks, trolls, and people that will hate you for no good reason, but those people are out there anyway - they don't change their mind if we control their speech. Communicating only in censored safe spaces gives us a false impression of the world. I'd rather have the truth. If I find comradery with other like-minded people in those forums, even better.
Exactly. If a white person has a problem with black ppl id rather have an honest conversation. I have plenty of white friends in rural areas (born in Oklahoma and live in Texas now) who the media would consider evil racists but we took the time to get to know each other. M But I’d say that about any race man or woman. I’d rather have honest discussions
Me too. I prefer honesty to people liking me.
Clayton Bigsby! Good to meet you
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BLNDqxrUUwQ
Ha! Can you imagine the reaction to that skit today.
We can just do some simple deduction, "white" is a label, and for it to exist there has to have been a reason for a distinction that is in contrast to "white". In other words, probably nobody in medieval Europe was calling each other "white". The label came about from America and the need to distinguish between Africans (at the time) and Anglo-saxon colonists who later revolted against the rule of England.
Therefore strictly speaking white people are the direct descendants of English people, just like black people should be the direct descendants of the African slaves of the time. Everything past that became extensions to BOTH "races", which means any immigrant arriving to America at first would not identify as either. This includes Africans like Nigerians, many of which I have personally spoken with and told me they didn't identify as "black", and also other Europeans who would arrive and would experience a couple generations before being considered "white". This is especially true of southern Europeans that are already a very mixed group of people dating back tot he Roman Empire.
Now the terms have been changed beyond recognition, and is just a reference to light or dark skin tones, plus some CRT bullshit having to do with being oppressor or oppressed. Sadly everyone is somewhat embracing these terms anyway, and as usual, the Left has changed language and everyone is just jumping on board and using the new terms instead of pushing back or countering with better terminology.
Progressives actually tried to abolish the terms "white" and "black" in the 90s. We thought we had won a victory against political correctness when we kept these terms. How wrong we were.
Imagine the leftists of today attempting to directly attack "European Americans". It simply wouldn't work. Too overtly racist. And try telling Europeans that they have no culture.
Oh wow. This idea was pushed around in the late 00's as true until a high schooler googled it and found proof Irish and others were not considered white or equals to others. It goes right up there with Shakespeare not existing even though we have records of his plays, his death and birth records and many people talking him when he was alive.
It's only believed by upper class idiots who want to sound smart and their students who don't know better.
Poles and Jews too, and of course they were, they weren't English or Scottish.
Steve Sailer's riposte:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boO4RowROiw
This isn't far from the truth. Know a guy whose grandfather got disinherited 'cause he married an Irish girl in the 1940's...
I always had a sense that it was complete BS, because that is what it sounds like, but I had never bothered to research it.