Even if we make it to a generation starship it'll be commandeered by blue haired 70 IQ diversity hires and inhabited by useless idiots who'll go max 2 years before they start burning down the hydroponic farms in protest over how they're not getting enough junk food as part of their daily rations and how that's racist and sexist.
It definitely seems like wokeism is a more serious "great filter" than war, or whatever else people assumed it was in the past. War accelerates innovation and the most significant jump in space exploration we've ever had was a dick measuring contest between two nations.
Meanwhile wokeism rots out the entity from the inside, causing the total cessation of all functionality. It could be a kind of biological limitation, that a species that reaches our stage will eat itself and get kicked back into a dark age.
No, our IQs and innovation have declined so much that the dream is beyond our reach now. We don't have to go to mars though to get an "alien invasion" though, already can witness one all over the West.
Average IQ might not matter that much when space travel is the realm of unusually high & autistic intelligence anyway. I could see a kind of dual caste forming in the west as the elite and intelligent get more insulated from the general hellhole population.
It's a long shot, but maybe enough of them could get to mars to be the seed of a new society - and probably eventually a new human subspecies since it could be a long time before earthlings can make contact again.
Another possibility is that the west's intelligent citizens will bail to somewhere like Russia, get into government etc, and then focus on escaping to mars before that nation is eaten by wokeism too.
I don't know if that's true. I read a book a while back called American Nations that suggests that immigrants to America have historically chosen to live in regions where people share their values. If so, that would suggest that the leftists would mostly move to the same set of planets and live under their racial caste system. People who aren't leftists would go to other planets. Of course, this would all assume that we're in a position to choose between several different planets.
If that are the case it would just end up like the situation currently in America. The leftists will ruin their planets and then move to and try to implement the same policies on more based planets.
Ever notice how leftist sounds like locust.
They are the reason it's so hard to have a functioning society thats also a free society. At least authoritarian societies don't put up with their crap as much.
Women contour to the dominant dogma. They are more religious on average (church attendance is very skewed), when they first got the vote in the UK it lead to more conservative MPs because they were slightly more conservative than men, as that was the prime dogma.
Wokeism is anti-darwinian, its carriers are less likely to pass on their genes, or if they do then they end up castrating their children. Obviously some wokers do breed successfully, but on average a conservative and traditionally religious woman is much more likely to spawn a family that's both large and stable, not to mention mentally healthy. In a SHTF scenario it's these kinds of families that will be best off.
My point: wokeism is genetic suicide. By nature it will destroy itself and those who are resistant to it will inherit the earth. The question is how deep we'll be into the new dark age by then and how much (if any) worthwhile civilization is left.
Or, hear me out on this one, we build three huge ark ships. We put all of them on ark ship B, and we tell them it has autopilot. Then we launch it towards some unknown sector of space, preferably directly at a star, so we don't end up screwing up the colonization of another planet, like the Golgafrincham species did...
If we can figure out a way to escape the wall of fiery hot plasma surrounding our solar system, we can figure out how to efficiently grow humans in tubes.
I assume is to object to having fields for sports, since guys play a lot of sports, but nothing for girls to do. Hence that useless stage for playing pretend.
What is interesting is that in the same article it says that the differences are only societal yet we need a female perspective. If the differences between interests are poorly societal then we do not need different perspectives since it means everyone will act the same way as long as we remove societal pressure.
Girls will play as much sports as guys and guys will want to nurture as much as women do, they've been ramming this in our heads for the last 2 decades so where is the societal pressure keeping girls from sports?
This, "it's a construct that men and women are different, and thus we have to construct an entirely new reality and language and society to allow women to exist than the one we had in 2003."
It's not even good planning. You have top-down design and you go with "sparse and plain"?
The main path should be underlit. Literally, like ground lights. Make 'em programmable, charge a small fee to have people run lightshows on 'em. Multicolor, make it as garish as a 1337 totally-pro-gamer PC. Make 'em hot enough to melt snow. Paths should be made based upon how people walk, use foot traffic data to find out where to build them, and make them on the most trafficked areas. Straight line or curved, the most natural routes makes for a better park experience.
Have lots of bushes. Roses, poison sumac, dolls eye. Make the prospect of sneaking through them ACTIVELY harmful, but defensible as they're all aesthetic plants, then put a cute little mini-fence around them to keep out dumb kids off their leashes.
You'll have an awesome tourist trap of a park destination, a marvel to check out if you're driving through the area, day or night... That's overtly hostile to people who don't follow the rules.
If that's not enough, hire a bacon vendor to give free bacon to everyone who enters as part of the tourist trap aesthetic. Maybe make it a bacon rose, to mesh the themes. They can act as secret security, and deter sex pests by having a guaranteed population present.
I was in Viena in 2010, the "male" designed architecture is amazing, it used to be among my favorite cities. The downside was a lot of rainbow haired teenagers in the parks, just standing there from what I could tell. Like wtf is that, raves at least have movement.
I know male and female perspective can differ but I would argue that the city is beautiful regardless of gender. It had this nobility about it, not sure how else I can say it,
Humanity is never going to make it off this planet to colonize space, are we?
Average IQ is going to be 85 in a 100 years.
Even if we make it to a generation starship it'll be commandeered by blue haired 70 IQ diversity hires and inhabited by useless idiots who'll go max 2 years before they start burning down the hydroponic farms in protest over how they're not getting enough junk food as part of their daily rations and how that's racist and sexist.
If I was an alien species I would make sure humans never infect other places.
It definitely seems like wokeism is a more serious "great filter" than war, or whatever else people assumed it was in the past. War accelerates innovation and the most significant jump in space exploration we've ever had was a dick measuring contest between two nations.
Meanwhile wokeism rots out the entity from the inside, causing the total cessation of all functionality. It could be a kind of biological limitation, that a species that reaches our stage will eat itself and get kicked back into a dark age.
No, our IQs and innovation have declined so much that the dream is beyond our reach now. We don't have to go to mars though to get an "alien invasion" though, already can witness one all over the West.
Average IQ might not matter that much when space travel is the realm of unusually high & autistic intelligence anyway. I could see a kind of dual caste forming in the west as the elite and intelligent get more insulated from the general hellhole population.
It's a long shot, but maybe enough of them could get to mars to be the seed of a new society - and probably eventually a new human subspecies since it could be a long time before earthlings can make contact again.
Another possibility is that the west's intelligent citizens will bail to somewhere like Russia, get into government etc, and then focus on escaping to mars before that nation is eaten by wokeism too.
I don't know if that's true. I read a book a while back called American Nations that suggests that immigrants to America have historically chosen to live in regions where people share their values. If so, that would suggest that the leftists would mostly move to the same set of planets and live under their racial caste system. People who aren't leftists would go to other planets. Of course, this would all assume that we're in a position to choose between several different planets.
If that are the case it would just end up like the situation currently in America. The leftists will ruin their planets and then move to and try to implement the same policies on more based planets.
Ever notice how leftist sounds like locust. They are the reason it's so hard to have a functioning society thats also a free society. At least authoritarian societies don't put up with their crap as much.
Young women are also easy to influence. It's their lack of men governing them that's part of the problem.
Huh? First. I've never lost an argument in my life. Second, you make a ton of comments, so it shouldn't surprise you.
Extreme statements are seldom true.
I understand the temptation to make that statement, but my dear...it is incorrect. I have won a few.
Women contour to the dominant dogma. They are more religious on average (church attendance is very skewed), when they first got the vote in the UK it lead to more conservative MPs because they were slightly more conservative than men, as that was the prime dogma.
Wokeism is anti-darwinian, its carriers are less likely to pass on their genes, or if they do then they end up castrating their children. Obviously some wokers do breed successfully, but on average a conservative and traditionally religious woman is much more likely to spawn a family that's both large and stable, not to mention mentally healthy. In a SHTF scenario it's these kinds of families that will be best off.
My point: wokeism is genetic suicide. By nature it will destroy itself and those who are resistant to it will inherit the earth. The question is how deep we'll be into the new dark age by then and how much (if any) worthwhile civilization is left.
What about lab grown humans. The elite won't need biological reproduction for new slaves.
Not really. Vast majority of leftist women won't reproduce. Population relies on those who do reproduce, welfare queens and conservative women.
Or, hear me out on this one, we build three huge ark ships. We put all of them on ark ship B, and we tell them it has autopilot. Then we launch it towards some unknown sector of space, preferably directly at a star, so we don't end up screwing up the colonization of another planet, like the Golgafrincham species did...
If we can figure out a way to escape the wall of fiery hot plasma surrounding our solar system, we can figure out how to efficiently grow humans in tubes.
Because when designing a city, teenage girls are who you should go to for advice.
I assume is to object to having fields for sports, since guys play a lot of sports, but nothing for girls to do. Hence that useless stage for playing pretend.
What is interesting is that in the same article it says that the differences are only societal yet we need a female perspective. If the differences between interests are poorly societal then we do not need different perspectives since it means everyone will act the same way as long as we remove societal pressure. Girls will play as much sports as guys and guys will want to nurture as much as women do, they've been ramming this in our heads for the last 2 decades so where is the societal pressure keeping girls from sports?
This, "it's a construct that men and women are different, and thus we have to construct an entirely new reality and language and society to allow women to exist than the one we had in 2003."
Just add some glitter.
When you have to design your city around hordes of sex pests maybe "gender neutrality" isn't the real problem but your immigration policy.
REEEE!
It's not even good planning. You have top-down design and you go with "sparse and plain"?
The main path should be underlit. Literally, like ground lights. Make 'em programmable, charge a small fee to have people run lightshows on 'em. Multicolor, make it as garish as a 1337 totally-pro-gamer PC. Make 'em hot enough to melt snow. Paths should be made based upon how people walk, use foot traffic data to find out where to build them, and make them on the most trafficked areas. Straight line or curved, the most natural routes makes for a better park experience.
Have lots of bushes. Roses, poison sumac, dolls eye. Make the prospect of sneaking through them ACTIVELY harmful, but defensible as they're all aesthetic plants, then put a cute little mini-fence around them to keep out dumb kids off their leashes.
You'll have an awesome tourist trap of a park destination, a marvel to check out if you're driving through the area, day or night... That's overtly hostile to people who don't follow the rules.
If that's not enough, hire a bacon vendor to give free bacon to everyone who enters as part of the tourist trap aesthetic. Maybe make it a bacon rose, to mesh the themes. They can act as secret security, and deter sex pests by having a guaranteed population present.
I was in Viena in 2010, the "male" designed architecture is amazing, it used to be among my favorite cities. The downside was a lot of rainbow haired teenagers in the parks, just standing there from what I could tell. Like wtf is that, raves at least have movement.
I know male and female perspective can differ but I would argue that the city is beautiful regardless of gender. It had this nobility about it, not sure how else I can say it,
Honestly I'm starting to rethink my objections to muslim hordes invading Europe. Everything must be gay and female oriented cause why the fuck not.
I do:
"You can't give me a ticket! The light was clearly dick-butt!"
This will go about as well as Feminist Snow Plowing:
An absolute civic disaster that might kill people, and will quickly be abandoned due to the sudden and unexpected carnage.
Remember when Sweden put feminists in charge of snow plowing years ago? Good times...
There were already feminist spots on every corner. They even had a nice district complete with mood lighting a lovely shade called 'passion'.
I could only make it 3 paragraphs.