Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

99
Another piece of evidence: 2020 US Census shows that millions fewer people voted in 2020, than were ballots counted. The discrepancy between the Census voter count and election ballots cast is nearly 4 million votes. (electionwiz.com)
posted 5 years ago by AlwysHideUrPowerLevl 5 years ago by AlwysHideUrPowerLevl +99 / -0
25 comments share
25 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (25)
sorted by:
▲ 46 ▼
– MrGiggles 46 points 5 years ago +46 / -0

What blows my mind is that even if Democrats are caught in the election rigging, nothing will be reversed and Joe Biden will remain President. What kind of society do we live in where we just shrug and say “oh well, better luck next time” when the “winning” politician cheated?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 32 ▼
– TikiTorchesBulging 32 points 5 years ago +32 / -0

this must be what it was like when kennedy "won" against nixon, except we have internet. i grew up being taught that everyone at the time KNEW the mob/daley put kennedy into office, despite the MSM covering it up. now everyone just thinks it was some conspiracy theory or unproven possibility.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– yvaN_ehT_nioJ 23 points 5 years ago +23 / -0

i grew up being taught that everyone at the time KNEW the mob/daley put kennedy into office, despite the MSM covering it up.

Really? That's honestly news to me. Grew up in the 00s so maybe it was too far past for people to remember but I haven't seen people say this until the last month or so.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– deleted 14 points 5 years ago +14 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– TikiTorchesBulging 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Yep, although this is second hand to me since I'm the generation after, but only Democrats and the media thought Nixon lost legitimately - when he finally actually won he was one of the most popular presidents ever in terms of electoral votes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– w-duranty6489 14 points 5 years ago +14 / -0

Clown society. Honk.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 16 ▼
– Hoofa 16 points 5 years ago +16 / -0

It should be roughly the same number as Biden's win margin. We are looking at votes created specifically for the purpose of winning 2020, after all.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Foletado 10 points 5 years ago +10 / -0

I debunked this on another thread already. There is no inconsistency:

252,274 total over 18yo
- 40,561report not voted
=
211713 who did or may have voted.

You can find a mountain of evidence of election fraud at

  • Infrastructure for integrity of government, elections, society: Wiki, Chat, and More.

Hope to see you in chat.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– CptLightning 23 points 5 years ago +23 / -0

I'm DEBOOONKING

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– CatoTheElder 19 points 5 years ago +19 / -0

I debunked

No, you are a glownigger gaslighting.

(all numbers are in thousands)

252,274 total over 18yo

Includes invaders, use 231,593 instead, which is the citizen population above 18.

211713 who did or may have voted.

So we are going to allow ambiguous numbers? In that case...

Citizens 18yo - not registered - unknown registration - not voted = Voters

231,583 - 25,782 - 37,503, - 40,561 = 127737

It looks like the discrepancy is even bigger when we use bullshit methods like yours.

Just use the Census office's number of reported voted: 154,628 and ballotpedia.org number of votes: 158,380 which gives a 3.7 million vote difference in agreement with the posted article.

To top it all off, you completely ignored the premise of the article, which is that the Census numbers always over-report the number of voters, except for 2020, where they under reported by 2%.

Year Census, FEC Census-FEC

1992 113866 104423 9443

1996 105017 96277 8740

2000 110826 105421 5405

2004 125736 122295 3441

2008 131144 131313 -169

2012 132948 129085 3863

2016 137537 136669 868

2020 154628 158380 -3752

In fact, this data makes it look like they cheated pretty hard to put the nigger into office in 2008, and they cheated some in 2016 against Trump, but didn't really take him seriously. Then in 2020 they pulled out all the stops to keep him out of office.

(this site needs code blocks for formatting)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– TwoBearArms 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

No, this guy is right.

According to the census table, there were 154,628,000 citizens who reported that they voted, and the total ballots counted was north of 155M. That much is true.

However, the census table also includes 36,404,000 who did not respond to the question of whether or not they voted. Presumable, there is a portion of this population that may have also voted but just didn't report it to the census.

Thus, the reason why this article doesn't really have all the facts.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– CatoTheElder 14 points 5 years ago +14 / -0

To top it all off, you completely ignored the premise of the article, which is that the Census numbers always over-report the number of voters, except for 2020, where they under reported by 2%.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TwoBearArms 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

In the census tables those other years, how many people were recorded as not having answered the question of whether or not they voted? Because I'm not prepared to give conclusions on incomplete data.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– CatoTheElder 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0

In the census tables those other years, how many people were recorded as not having answered the question of whether or not they voted?

No data for that before 2012, as far as i can tell.

year, unanswered, %census, %FEC

2012: 27,601 20.76% 21.38%

2016: 32,662 23.75% 23.90%

2020: 36,404 23.54% 22.99%

Note that the number of unanswered decreases relative to the number of votes from 2016 to 2020.

The number of people that did not answer is uncorrelated to the Census-FEC number.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TwoBearArms 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Okay, so, what's the point then? Why does the data have to be the same each year?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– CatoTheElder 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

Your argument, and by extension Foletado's argument, it that the unanswered population accounts for the discrepancy between the Census and FEC vote totals. For that to be true to be true there would have to be a large spike in unanswered population relative to total votes from 2016 to 2020. Since there is not then there is reasonable evidence that the excess FEC vote totals are fraudulent, phantom voters, as the democrats are unlikely to waste time faking those Census statistics.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 3 ▼
– DotWinners 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Nobody cares about reality. If they did, they wouldn’t be believing something like this from someone’s personal blog without researching it. It reaffirms what they want to believe, so they believe it.

The left isn’t any better though. God forbid you defend yourself against a black person, you’re automatically racist, with reality not mattering at all.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– mrsray 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

that in itself should prove fraud

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Chachiex 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Almost twice the illegal votes in California

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy