Includes invaders, use 231,593 instead, which is the citizen population above 18.
211713 who did or may have voted.
So we are going to allow ambiguous numbers? In that case...
Citizens 18yo - not registered - unknown registration - not voted = Voters
231,583 - 25,782 - 37,503, - 40,561 = 127737
It looks like the discrepancy is even bigger when we use bullshit methods like yours.
Just use the Census office's number of reported voted: 154,628
and ballotpedia.org number of votes: 158,380
which gives a 3.7 million vote difference in agreement with the posted article.
To top it all off, you completely ignored the premise of the article, which is that the Census numbers always over-report the number of voters, except for 2020, where they under reported by 2%.
Year Census, FEC Census-FEC
1992 113866 104423 9443
1996 105017 96277 8740
2000 110826 105421 5405
2004 125736 122295 3441
2008 131144 131313 -169
2012 132948 129085 3863
2016 137537 136669 868
2020 154628 158380 -3752
In fact, this data makes it look like they cheated pretty hard to put the nigger into office in 2008, and they cheated some in 2016 against Trump, but didn't really take him seriously. Then in 2020 they pulled out all the stops to keep him out of office.
According to the census table, there were 154,628,000 citizens who reported that they voted, and the total ballots counted was north of 155M. That much is true.
However, the census table also includes 36,404,000 who did not respond to the question of whether or not they voted. Presumable, there is a portion of this population that may have also voted but just didn't report it to the census.
Thus, the reason why this article doesn't really have all the facts.
To top it all off, you completely ignored the premise of the article, which is that the Census numbers always over-report the number of voters, except for 2020, where they under reported by 2%.
In the census tables those other years, how many people were recorded as not having answered the question of whether or not they voted? Because I'm not prepared to give conclusions on incomplete data.
No, you are a glownigger gaslighting.
(all numbers are in thousands)
Includes invaders, use 231,593 instead, which is the citizen population above 18.
So we are going to allow ambiguous numbers? In that case...
Citizens 18yo - not registered - unknown registration - not voted = Voters
231,583 - 25,782 - 37,503, - 40,561 = 127737
It looks like the discrepancy is even bigger when we use bullshit methods like yours.
Just use the Census office's number of reported voted: 154,628 and ballotpedia.org number of votes: 158,380 which gives a 3.7 million vote difference in agreement with the posted article.
To top it all off, you completely ignored the premise of the article, which is that the Census numbers always over-report the number of voters, except for 2020, where they under reported by 2%.
Year Census, FEC Census-FEC
1992 113866 104423 9443
1996 105017 96277 8740
2000 110826 105421 5405
2004 125736 122295 3441
2008 131144 131313 -169
2012 132948 129085 3863
2016 137537 136669 868
2020 154628 158380 -3752
In fact, this data makes it look like they cheated pretty hard to put the nigger into office in 2008, and they cheated some in 2016 against Trump, but didn't really take him seriously. Then in 2020 they pulled out all the stops to keep him out of office.
(this site needs code blocks for formatting)
No, this guy is right.
According to the census table, there were 154,628,000 citizens who reported that they voted, and the total ballots counted was north of 155M. That much is true.
However, the census table also includes 36,404,000 who did not respond to the question of whether or not they voted. Presumable, there is a portion of this population that may have also voted but just didn't report it to the census.
Thus, the reason why this article doesn't really have all the facts.
In the census tables those other years, how many people were recorded as not having answered the question of whether or not they voted? Because I'm not prepared to give conclusions on incomplete data.
No data for that before 2012, as far as i can tell.
year, unanswered, %census, %FEC
2012: 27,601 20.76% 21.38%
2016: 32,662 23.75% 23.90%
2020: 36,404 23.54% 22.99%
Note that the number of unanswered decreases relative to the number of votes from 2016 to 2020.
The number of people that did not answer is uncorrelated to the Census-FEC number.