I have seen such a thing as a 100-sided die 30 years ago, the thing was more of a joke than anything else - very hard to read. Better off just using two different D10s.
I want one of these as a DM so when a player annoys me I will roll it and if it hits a certain number that player's character gets hit with a lightning bolt out of no where.
I just started my first ever DnD campaign like a month ago, but is it not normal to have a 100-sided die for Nat 1 rolls? Because that's what they have been using.
I thought it was a normal thing because it makes sense and they have a book for it.
I've never used a d100 die but I've not played in like 5 years, maybe things have change. You had the d10 dices for those right? It was even in the rule book.
Yeah, I'm a complete beginner so I just thought it was the norm. Its almost a spectacle moment of pulling it out, then dropping the heavy weight. Way more exciting than the 2 d10s we rolled for percentages.
It's been 30-35 years since I played, and I played only the original version and AD&D second edition, so, no, not from what I remember. Our DM just had one because he was a collector, and had it for an oddity.
As I said, for percentages, we'd just roll two D10s. I had a lot of those, as I was the Werewolf: the Apocalypse storyteller on Mondays (Storyteller system only uses D10s; it's simple but highly versatile and easier to understand/work with than TSR's. And no, I wasn't impressed about the way certain Tribes got Flanderized by about Revised/3rd ed of that game, and I hated Forsaken by the second page, didn't buy it.)
I haven't a clue what Wizards of the Coast did to AD&D beyond hearing that they simplified things a lot.
Right right, I suppose its just the group I joined had one to embrace the spectacle and meme of the Nat 1 and rolling it made that event much more impactful than two generic D10s.
Easier way than rolling a d100 is using 2 d10s. Assign one as the tens place and the other as the ones. Some even come marked with an extra 0 on every face so you don't even need two separate colors.
D100 faces are just so small it can be hard to determine what was rolled.
I have seen such a thing as a 100-sided die 30 years ago, the thing was more of a joke than anything else - very hard to read. Better off just using two different D10s.
You fucking cis bigot and your binary oppression!
I want one of these as a DM so when a player annoys me I will roll it and if it hits a certain number that player's character gets hit with a lightning bolt out of no where.
Just cut out the middleman and throw the die at the player ...
But then you need a bunch of them.
I just started my first ever DnD campaign like a month ago, but is it not normal to have a 100-sided die for Nat 1 rolls? Because that's what they have been using.
I thought it was a normal thing because it makes sense and they have a book for it.
I've never used a d100 die but I've not played in like 5 years, maybe things have change. You had the d10 dices for those right? It was even in the rule book.
Yeah, I'm a complete beginner so I just thought it was the norm. Its almost a spectacle moment of pulling it out, then dropping the heavy weight. Way more exciting than the 2 d10s we rolled for percentages.
It's been 30-35 years since I played, and I played only the original version and AD&D second edition, so, no, not from what I remember. Our DM just had one because he was a collector, and had it for an oddity.
As I said, for percentages, we'd just roll two D10s. I had a lot of those, as I was the Werewolf: the Apocalypse storyteller on Mondays (Storyteller system only uses D10s; it's simple but highly versatile and easier to understand/work with than TSR's. And no, I wasn't impressed about the way certain Tribes got Flanderized by about Revised/3rd ed of that game, and I hated Forsaken by the second page, didn't buy it.)
I haven't a clue what Wizards of the Coast did to AD&D beyond hearing that they simplified things a lot.
Right right, I suppose its just the group I joined had one to embrace the spectacle and meme of the Nat 1 and rolling it made that event much more impactful than two generic D10s.
Easier way than rolling a d100 is using 2 d10s. Assign one as the tens place and the other as the ones. Some even come marked with an extra 0 on every face so you don't even need two separate colors.
D100 faces are just so small it can be hard to determine what was rolled.
First thought was literally:
“It’s got to be a Bee article or video. I was not disappointed. XD
The examples on the picture are fuckin hilarious.
Hadn't seen that before - that was gold!
Also, that guy looks like he just stepped off the set of Die Hard. :)
OK, now go listen to The Polygon Song.
The doctor is deffo Operation Paperclip all the way through ...
That was savage. And most likely there is a leftist there that is offended their gender was not on the list.
What's the twitch deer gonna do he missed deer.
Sit on the lawn and eat grass?
Wouldn’t that make it “rolling a natural female”?
?
They either do that or they are denying the right of * INSERT RANDOM CRAP* to exist.
I want a 10,000 sided die. Just to see how close to a sphere it is.
But 100 sided die already exist, albiet mostly in computers.