For many men, finding a woman’s G-spot is up there with opening a unicorn riding school for achievable goals (my sympathies, ladies)
Is there anything more pathetic than a writer trying to project their own personal incompetency on their entire demographic in a failed attempt to make himself look like less of a failure?
Considering that most women these days can't find their own G-spot, or if they can it takes a hooked vibrator with a motor that has a pull-start and i's branded "Yardmaster" to get them off, I hardly think that most men should be chastised for not being able to find a patch on the inside wall of the vag that you can't even hit with your dick, from any angle.
Seriously, why are so many of these outlets trying to get straight men to take it in the shitter? This article isn't unique, it's just the one I came across that led me to make this post. There was another one on the Reddit sub several months back, and I'm sure there's plenty more.
I've skimmed this one and it gives a list reasons men should do it, but the million dollar question is this: Even if all these reasons were completely sound and not just excuses for perverts to feel better about themselves, why is the media so insistent on trying to get straight men to do this?
It’s the next thing on their list for destroying western society by creating even weaker men. Really hard to be a proud manly man who pulls themselves up by their own boot straps if you know you have done that. Hard for women to actually respect a man if they let them do that to them so another notch in the destruction of the family. The biggest threat to Marxism is strong, proud, self motivated men. So convincing men to do what’s probably the least manly thing imaginable will make weaker men.
It's baffling to me so many people here don't know or understand what you stated, but the trending pattern among Leftists is the defenestration of Western masculinity.
Low birth rates in first world countries, fewer men willing to fight back, no men willing to take initiative or charge. It makes it easier for them to take control with their hodgepodge mud-pie army.
Seriously, why are so many of these outlets trying to get straight men to take it in the shitter?
It's part of demoralisation. The aim is to force you to accept things you do not want.
I understand that life in the USSR didn't involve, as you might expect, trying to tailor the propaganda to be as close to reality as would work. No, for this purpose, you want to force people to accept the biggest lie, the most glaring untruth that you can, to make them surrender even their rationality to the state.
This is that. You will be made to accept that which you hate, so that you know who your master is.
It’s like they’re in a race with themselves to see if they can push more butt-stuff or cuckoldry on men. I wonder how well it would go over if someone wrote an article trying to convince women to take it in the ass?
.. is that not normal to left wingers yet? Any time I've seen it come up on reedit it's been encouragement for women too, and that's obviously reflected quite clearly in porn as well.
Maybe it's the troomers posing as women making it seem like it's more widely accepted among them.
It's not just in schools, it's in ALL of children's media, especially their cartoons.
The idea is to create confusion and sexual disorientation, you can achieve this most effectively (especially in males) at an early age during prepubescent years.
They usually target females during high-school and especially during college.
It's extremely difficult to reorient a male's sexual drive after puberty, which is why they're so aggressive with the homo agenda in children's media.
LOL I noticed the same thing with various tv shows and comedies talking about butt plugs. Like I always knew it as some gay thing so yeah it's a funny topic for jokes, but they were acting like it's a toy everybody uses. (i.e. normalizing it) I'd literally never heard of a straight person using butt plugs before that.
It all seems so tedious that one would have to prepare teh anus for penetration so far, I assume, in advance. I mean, you can't just plunge it in. Can you?
Now, I am guessing here, but doesn't the rectum have to be fully evacuated and then an instrument used and worn for some time to dilate it for the penis? And then there must be lubricants.
Is this so?
Because otherwise you will hurt the other person and get poop on your dick.
Surely these are signs that it is not an activity for which the pooper is designer.
And in any case, as far as male to male goes, it is not psychologically healthy for a man to submit to another man.
In history, a woman may submit and survive and even thrive. But a man who submits will die, now or later in chains.
The primary relationship between men is not one of dominance and submission but one of co-operation, which is something that, in their place, women know very little about.
I don't know about men butts, but in my experience with women's prep isn't always necessary nor is long dilation. Even for women with little experience in that area.
You of course should do both, but it can be a spontaneous thing without it going horribly wrong most of the time. Even only using her own natural lubrication if you are getting that engine running good.
But, men and women are not the same, so the same metrics and actions cannot just be moved over from one to the other even with their butts.
Strap-ons have been around for centuries and pegging – a man being penetrated by a woman – doesn’t make you gay. So much of hetero sex 101 obsesses over a man penetrating a woman that it ignores the exciting change of dynamic switching things up can bring....
At this point I think all these woman-oriented fetishes should be banned and regarded as sexual battery.
I mean, the faggot who wrote this calls himself "Guyliner", and I don't think anyone reads GQ without at least five dicks in his mouth, so it makes sense to talk about sex. I just don't understand why the author seems to pretend that not everyone reading his drivel craves penis.
Is there anything more pathetic than a writer trying to project their own personal incompetency on their entire demographic in a failed attempt to make himself look like less of a failure?
Considering that most women these days can't find their own G-spot, or if they can it takes a hooked vibrator with a motor that has a pull-start and i's branded "Yardmaster" to get them off, I hardly think that most men should be chastised for not being able to find a patch on the inside wall of the vag that you can't even hit with your dick, from any angle.
Seriously, why are so many of these outlets trying to get straight men to take it in the shitter? This article isn't unique, it's just the one I came across that led me to make this post. There was another one on the Reddit sub several months back, and I'm sure there's plenty more.
I've skimmed this one and it gives a list reasons men should do it, but the million dollar question is this: Even if all these reasons were completely sound and not just excuses for perverts to feel better about themselves, why is the media so insistent on trying to get straight men to do this?
It’s the next thing on their list for destroying western society by creating even weaker men. Really hard to be a proud manly man who pulls themselves up by their own boot straps if you know you have done that. Hard for women to actually respect a man if they let them do that to them so another notch in the destruction of the family. The biggest threat to Marxism is strong, proud, self motivated men. So convincing men to do what’s probably the least manly thing imaginable will make weaker men.
Spot on!!! It is the gradual subversion of gender identity. Making men weak.
I'm with Candace Owens on this one:
BRING BACK MANLY MEN!
100% correct.
It's all part of the Rainbow Reich agenda.
It's baffling to me so many people here don't know or understand what you stated, but the trending pattern among Leftists is the defenestration of Western masculinity.
Low birth rates in first world countries, fewer men willing to fight back, no men willing to take initiative or charge. It makes it easier for them to take control with their hodgepodge mud-pie army.
It's part of demoralisation. The aim is to force you to accept things you do not want.
I understand that life in the USSR didn't involve, as you might expect, trying to tailor the propaganda to be as close to reality as would work. No, for this purpose, you want to force people to accept the biggest lie, the most glaring untruth that you can, to make them surrender even their rationality to the state.
This is that. You will be made to accept that which you hate, so that you know who your master is.
All in the name of progressiveness.
I just got to the part of 1984 where Winston is forced to make himself believe 4 is 5. Really apt comparison for today's shit.
It’s like they’re in a race with themselves to see if they can push more butt-stuff or cuckoldry on men. I wonder how well it would go over if someone wrote an article trying to convince women to take it in the ass?
.. is that not normal to left wingers yet? Any time I've seen it come up on reedit it's been encouragement for women too, and that's obviously reflected quite clearly in porn as well.
Maybe it's the troomers posing as women making it seem like it's more widely accepted among them.
I’ve actually wondered that as well. And trying to expose kids to this in schools.
It's not just in schools, it's in ALL of children's media, especially their cartoons.
The idea is to create confusion and sexual disorientation, you can achieve this most effectively (especially in males) at an early age during prepubescent years.
They usually target females during high-school and especially during college.
It's extremely difficult to reorient a male's sexual drive after puberty, which is why they're so aggressive with the homo agenda in children's media.
Remember when they used to say what people do in private is none of our business?
That’s only if you are criticizing their perversion. Them encouraging you to partake in their perversion has different rules. Like everything they do
LOL I noticed the same thing with various tv shows and comedies talking about butt plugs. Like I always knew it as some gay thing so yeah it's a funny topic for jokes, but they were acting like it's a toy everybody uses. (i.e. normalizing it) I'd literally never heard of a straight person using butt plugs before that.
It all seems so tedious that one would have to prepare teh anus for penetration so far, I assume, in advance. I mean, you can't just plunge it in. Can you?
Now, I am guessing here, but doesn't the rectum have to be fully evacuated and then an instrument used and worn for some time to dilate it for the penis? And then there must be lubricants.
Is this so?
Because otherwise you will hurt the other person and get poop on your dick.
Surely these are signs that it is not an activity for which the pooper is designer.
And in any case, as far as male to male goes, it is not psychologically healthy for a man to submit to another man.
In history, a woman may submit and survive and even thrive. But a man who submits will die, now or later in chains.
The primary relationship between men is not one of dominance and submission but one of co-operation, which is something that, in their place, women know very little about.
I don't know about men butts, but in my experience with women's prep isn't always necessary nor is long dilation. Even for women with little experience in that area.
You of course should do both, but it can be a spontaneous thing without it going horribly wrong most of the time. Even only using her own natural lubrication if you are getting that engine running good.
But, men and women are not the same, so the same metrics and actions cannot just be moved over from one to the other even with their butts.
At this point I think all these woman-oriented fetishes should be banned and regarded as sexual battery.
"Mental illness has been around for centuries, so..."
The Booty is mine.
It belongs to me.
YOU CAN'T HAVE MY BOOTY.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Gyno Quarterly is probably only second to Teen Vogue in terms of advocating for degeneracy.
What is this insanity? Gross.
The collapse can't come fast enough
This was almost exact topic of one of the Sokal Squared hoax academic papers: Getting men to stick things up their butts makes them less homophobic.
Reality is stuck in self-parody mode.
Being the degenerate I am I don’t mind bussy play but honestly forcing people to do this shit even if they don’t like it is hella fucked
I mean, the faggot who wrote this calls himself "Guyliner", and I don't think anyone reads GQ without at least five dicks in his mouth, so it makes sense to talk about sex. I just don't understand why the author seems to pretend that not everyone reading his drivel craves penis.
Sodomy is one of the 4 sins God wipes entire civilizations off of the map for.