You see, denmark. Men are fast to adapt to adverse or even favourable circumstances, but they are slow to really change on a fundamental level.

You, dear denmark and all your feminists and the simps that listen to these feminists and the powers that be that use these feminists have told your men that women don't need men. That they don't want men. That men are dangerous and toxic. Men have adapted by playing your game if it meant just a glimmer of hope to have a loving family and lasting legacy. They did this very fast. But slowly they started to change too. You didn't realize, because you celebrated your seeming conquest of men and male nature. They started to notice that the deal isn't a sweet one. They started to notice that the deal isn't even a bad one. They noticed that the deal you are willing to give to men is horrible and insulting and there's no way to participate in the game without losing.

You are now starting to really reap what you have sown. You have changed men on a fundamental level. You made them apathetic of you, apathetic of women, apathetic of the simps and puppeteers. And when men stop caring about their community, the community is done for.

You may be lucky and get men to adapt in a way that keeps denmark from burning to the ground. But changing them back into something that's fit to build something on will take a long time.

And so, dear denmark, dear feminists, simps and puppeteers I'll end with regards. Please get thoroughly fucked (and not in a positive way)

YMMV and you can, of course, use every other country on earth.

Funny but kind of scary. This is the logical conclusion to feminism, it sucks to be a dude in a feminist country.

And let me guess, they blame the lack of birthrate on prosperity rather then feminisms and they need mass immigration.

It always go this way, feminism>immigration>destruction of culture and national identity

Frankly if you are a dude and you date a feminist you are insane. If she uses the words patriarchy, equity or gender roles in the first few days just fucking run, change phones, change address cause most likely she is going to accuse you of rape or something.

“Do it for Denmark” Isn’t that very similar to the old “lie back and think of England”?

Feminism requires globalism. It's the same race to the bottom, with female hypergamy in the role of multinational corporatism and foreign cock in the role of cheap labor. The state can treat you like shit because there's a dirt worlder right behind you, eager to put up with that shit in exchange for access to pink nipples. This could never happen if your society still needed its men - as opposed to any men, from anywhere.

Feminists dont deserve to procreate. Why would any man intentionally have offspring with a woman that has every intention of brainwashing them into a perverted ideology

I actually kind of wonder, because the statistics bare it out a bit, and I've had conversations with former lefties that reflect the same.

So, the former lefty I used to talk with on TiA was a woman who left radical feminism and Leftism because she got a boyfriend. And not a shitty one, but a decently attractive boyfriend who had a job, a car, a clear career path, and they had a loving relationship. He was not into politics, but when she brought it up, he was fairly centrist, and a little right-leaning on some issues. Someone who probably wouldn't go any further right than Dave Rubin.

I've always claimed that Leftists social circles tend to orbit around sociopaths & narcissists that use the Social Environment to cultivate prey to predate upon. The former Lefty spent more time with a normal human that loved her, and didn't need the ravings of Feminist lunatics. All of the sudden she started not only drifting, but opposing their values. She told me she didn't realize how crazy they really were until she spoke with them recently about how they all seemed like they were constantly plotting stuff. She gave me an example, and I had to remind her that plotting to literally subvert & trick people into using trans-activist language, and then trying to shame them into never going back from it is fundamentally abusive and coercive. That seemed to be a bit of a revelation for her that they never even entertained the idea of consent in their actions.

I've also noticed that, according to the statistics, women's attitudes politically swing violently in regards to their marital status. No matter how many times they've been married before. If they are married they swing fully to the right, and if they are unmarried they swing fully to the left.

My hypothesis is that women need some kind of protectionism as a biological imperative, and normally: men are supposed to take over that function. I have a larger argument about Sexual Inflation and authoritarianism's role in that, but suffice it to say: women need to feel protected, and the state steps in, it reduces the role of men in that society and creates a feed-back loop of unprotected women, but also defeatist men. If women need men to act as a foundation to operate off of, and to protect them from disaster (in order to successfully raise a family), then they need to both recognize the value of men, and men need to actually embody that masculine foundation & protectionism.

What I think is happening with both the former lefty woman, and marital status, and Leftist women who keep fetishizing right-wingers, is a bunch of unprotected women with no masculine foundational men to work with. But if a masculine foundation enters their lives, they are basically pulled away from the false protection rackets of the government and ideological zealotry, and are going to feel genuinely protected by men.

TL:DR -

I'm pretty sure you can fuck the feminazi out of a bitch if you are dominant enough to come to a Taming Of The Shrew moment with her. Denmark is on to something.

That's a no from me, Dawg.