I actually kind of wonder, because the statistics bare it out a bit, and I've had conversations with former lefties that reflect the same.

So, the former lefty I used to talk with on TiA was a woman who left radical feminism and Leftism because she got a boyfriend. And not a shitty one, but a decently attractive boyfriend who had a job, a car, a clear career path, and they had a loving relationship. He was not into politics, but when she brought it up, he was fairly centrist, and a little right-leaning on some issues. Someone who probably wouldn't go any further right than Dave Rubin.

I've always claimed that Leftists social circles tend to orbit around sociopaths & narcissists that use the Social Environment to cultivate prey to predate upon. The former Lefty spent more time with a normal human that loved her, and didn't need the ravings of Feminist lunatics. All of the sudden she started not only drifting, but opposing their values. She told me she didn't realize how crazy they really were until she spoke with them recently about how they all seemed like they were constantly plotting stuff. She gave me an example, and I had to remind her that plotting to literally subvert & trick people into using trans-activist language, and then trying to shame them into never going back from it is fundamentally abusive and coercive. That seemed to be a bit of a revelation for her that they never even entertained the idea of consent in their actions.

I've also noticed that, according to the statistics, women's attitudes politically swing violently in regards to their marital status. No matter how many times they've been married before. If they are married they swing fully to the right, and if they are unmarried they swing fully to the left.

My hypothesis is that women need some kind of protectionism as a biological imperative, and normally: men are supposed to take over that function. I have a larger argument about Sexual Inflation and authoritarianism's role in that, but suffice it to say: women need to feel protected, and the state steps in, it reduces the role of men in that society and creates a feed-back loop of unprotected women, but also defeatist men. If women need men to act as a foundation to operate off of, and to protect them from disaster (in order to successfully raise a family), then they need to both recognize the value of men, and men need to actually embody that masculine foundation & protectionism.

What I think is happening with both the former lefty woman, and marital status, and Leftist women who keep fetishizing right-wingers, is a bunch of unprotected women with no masculine foundational men to work with. But if a masculine foundation enters their lives, they are basically pulled away from the false protection rackets of the government and ideological zealotry, and are going to feel genuinely protected by men.

TL:DR -

I'm pretty sure you can fuck the feminazi out of a bitch if you are dominant enough to come to a Taming Of The Shrew moment with her. Denmark is on to something.