Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

59
'Black supremacist'? Anti-racism media silent after Tucker Carlson exposes bigoted views of Biden's DOJ civil rights pick (www.rt.com)
posted 5 years ago by Eldourado 5 years ago by Eldourado +59 / -0
26 comments share
26 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (26)
sorted by:
▲ 41 ▼
– Galean 41 points 5 years ago +41 / -0

It is all so tiresome, Democrats can literally do nothing wrong. The media ignores it, the tech giants burry the information, soon I expect it will be a conspiracy theory.

And despite all of that the left are the rebels fighting the authority?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 34 ▼
– LordBaltimore 34 points 5 years ago +34 / -0

It's funny how the new Star Wars movies reflected this shit, the first order are the bad guys who are actually a small group trying to push back against the new republic who act as though they are actually the small plucky underdogs even though they are in control. Probably shouldn't have expected anything better from the smoothbrains that took over Lucasfilm though.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 36 ▼
– BulbasaurusThe7th 36 points 5 years ago +36 / -0

I especially adore how they always mention how blacks supposedly have spiritual power. This hog has some college degree and she literally thinks blacks have magical powers.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– jenniferq8 25 points 5 years ago +25 / -0

That is especially hilarious. It reminds me of the early days of Covid when black twitter thought melanin made them immune to the disease and it was retribution for "Colonialism." Once that proved to be false and it affected them especially harshly they blamed it on white people and went back to talking about "mediocre white men."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 5 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 30 ▼
– Kingarthas2 30 points 5 years ago +30 / -0

The next 4 years are going to be fucking dark, aren't they?

Hopefully people learn something, but i get the feeling elections don't matter any more either.

Thank you nevertrumpers, truly, they'll just commit election fraud this once.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 28 ▼
– randomuser88385 28 points 5 years ago +28 / -0

If by 4 years you mean 40 or 400, I might agree with you. I don't see a way back from this for the west as without meritocracy we lose our competitive edge and slip deeper into 3rd world status.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– TechParadox 13 points 5 years ago +13 / -0

The next 4 years are going to be fucking dark, aren't they?

Four? Shit, we'll be lucky if it's only four.

i get the feeling elections don't matter any more either.

They've already proven that they have no qualms about fraud when it comes to pushing their agenda, and I would almost guarantee you that in the next election, if the GOP candidate wins the popular vote by a landslide, we'll see them suddenly find the irregularities in the process they claim weren't here this time around. Either that or they'll have already gone full retard and abolished the Electoral College, ensuring that the tyranny of the majority will be in full swing as the country sinks further into third-world status. Either way, they won't let up on their attack on our personal freedoms until they've established their own authoritarian state.

Prior to the last four years I would have said, "Fuck it, I'm moving to Canada", but they're just as woke, if not more so, up there. Anyone have any suggestions on a non-woke safe haven? :)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TentElephant 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

East Timur is based, but they don't let people in—again, based.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– NoGardE 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Brasilia would probably be glad to take based refugees.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Knife-TotingRat 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Oh, you wouldn't like our first-past-the-post system of voting, anyway. :P

(No, I don't understand your electoral college, and the idea of someone standing between me and my vote sounds creepy. I can't stand anyone who wants to change things to give "minority" parties status, though, because all our "minority" parties are either literal jokes, or batshit crazy on both ends of the spectrum, from full-blown communists to people still stuck on hating French Catholics, to weirdoes with their yogic flyers, you might as well let a rhinoceros run for office.)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– TechParadox 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Oh, you wouldn't like our first-past-the-post system of voting, anyway. :P

In a two-party system (which, to be honest, is effectively what we have - the other parties get bent over the barrel every time they try to put a candidate into the mix) FPTP might not be so bad, but we'd still get screwed by the liberal sinkholes on both coasts.

No, I don't understand your electoral college, and the idea of someone standing between me and my vote sounds creepy.

To be fair, most Americans don't get it, either. In its purest form it helps prevent some of the tyranny of majority by limiting the amount of votes for a given candidate from each state, as we saw in 2016. The state only gets a number of votes equal to the total number of congress-critters they have in the house & senate (so a minimum of 3 per state), and those votes are cast based on who won the popular vote in the state.

Yeah, it's convoluted as fuck, but in a perfect situation it keeps overpopulated liberal hellholes like California from running rampant over the election. The downside to it is that as goes the state, so go ALL the votes, so it effectively disenfranchises the votes of those people who didn't vote the same as the majority in the state - case in point, Illinois. If you look at a voting map of IL there is a massive blue blotch up around Chicago, a couple more blue blotches where some major cities down-state exist, and the entire rest of the state is red. But because Chicago and the collar counties are such a massive population sink, their vote carries the state's 20 electoral votes into liberal territory every damn time.

Personally, I would prefer that the electoral votes be broken down into a district system. If a district voted majority red, then the vote goes to the red team, and vice versa. That way there would be less of a barrier between the voter and their preferred candidate. It still wouldn't be perfect, but it'd be better than the shit-show we have going on now.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– RealEdwardNigma 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

I have always advocated for the idea of states splitting their electoral votes so that the rural people have a fucking voice in our elections. We need to fix the holes in our current system before switching to a completely different system or throwing it out entirely, like the Dems want to do because it benefits their side.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TechParadox 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

We need to fix the holes in our current system before switching to a completely different system or throwing it out entirely...

Therein lies the rub. So long as either side benefits from the status quo, they won't want it changed. Same thing goes for term limits for congress. I've been in favor of that since I reached voting age - after all, if the president is limited to two-and-out, then why the hell should we get lifetime politicians in the House and Senate? But because they're the ones that can change the rule, they won't ever do it. Our founding fathers never intended for someone to spend 50+ years occupying a seat in government, but here we are today with things the way they are.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 28 ▼
– HeckOffSteppersReeee 28 points 5 years ago +28 / -0

Well boys, the mask is fully off.

Prepare yourselves.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– KeeperOfTheGate 21 points 5 years ago +21 / -0

Honestly, this all makes total sense.

If you're black, your ancestors were at the absolute bottom of the civilization totem pole for, well, all of human history. If you're black, chances are your ancestors were slaves, whether in India, the Middle East, African, Europe, or the Americas. European colonialism threw salt in the wound. If you're black in America, you and your ancestors have faced some pretty shitty laws, racism, etc. Now's the time to get what you deserve.

If you're gay, you can point to a long history of gay people (though you're not directly related to them) who were discriminated against and treated in pretty shitty ways. Now's the time to get what you deserve.

If you're Chinese, your ancestors were part of probably the greatest (or one of the greatest) civilizations in history at various points over the last several thousand years. China had a bad run once Europe hit its stride, perhaps symbolically culminating in the British burning the Summer Palace. Now's the time to get (back) what you deserve.

If you're Muslim, well, forces of Christianity and Islam have been fighting -- theologically, militarily, and culturally -- literally since the days of Muhammad and the Umayyad Caliphate. For several centuries Islamdom had the upper hand, but then Europe overtook them. Now that's the time to get (back) what you deserve.

All of these groups smell blood in the water. An alliance of neo-puritanical, self-flagellating liberal whites, anti-white racists, and anti-Western Civilizations evangelizers know that now is the chance to not only smash Western Civilization, but to get their particular ethno-sexual-gender whatever Marxist-identity group into power.

This is all about power. I don't know what the endgame is, but I don't think it's pretty.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– deleted 21 points 5 years ago +21 / -0
▲ 20 ▼
– Smith1980 20 points 5 years ago +20 / -0

In a just world she wouldn’t be confirmed

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– cccpneveragain 18 points 5 years ago +18 / -0

Whenever all the shit finally falls and 100 years from now history looks back on now, I predict it will be exactly that. The era of the rise of black supremacy mixed in with all the other BS that's going on with trannies and such.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– deleted 13 points 5 years ago +13 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– randomuser88385 12 points 5 years ago +12 / -0

But blacks aren't superior (I'm not saying anyone is), and unless there is a cultural change among them to stop blame shifting problems and actually work to solve issues to get educated (or at least work hard) then it's just going to end in more suffering.

For example the current flavor of blame shifting is attributing poor educational outcomes on 'systemic racism' isn't looking at the right issue, and I expect yet another generation (or more) of uneducated blacks. Or worse uneducated blacks with diversity quota degrees that are worthless and drag down the value of those degrees for everyone.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

I can already tell you your prediction will be wrong. Blacks are tools of the elite just like every other "minority". They'll only be "supremacists" as long as it serves the current narrative.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– cccpneveragain 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

Yeah I can't really argue that point. I'm not going to pretend I sit down and totally work through all thoughts before I start spewing them on the internet. Maybe more accurate would be the appearance of black supremacy, or perhaps just totally off altogether. I wholeheartedly agree that blacks are pawns to be thrown away when they are no longer useful. That's not a new opinion on my part, and it certainly conflicts with my assumption of a world of black supremacy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy