Speaking of gender theory, I have some good news I've recently found out, Romania has a new party that no one has heard off or at least it was completely ignored by the media, called AUR (translates to gold).

It got 9% of the votes which is huge for a new party, without a proper campaign and little money is now part of the parliament. It campaigned on facebook and I think twitter and most of voting base being young people bellow 35, so double-nice . It also had huge support from Romanians that live in other countries which is like 2 million Romanians. What happened was that Romanians abroad have seen what marxism and political correctness did to the west and decided to vote against it.

AUR has a specific platform: anti-marxism and anti-gender theory. There was an attempt to smear it as racist but the founder is or at least looks like of gypsy origins. It also has a platform pro family unit and pro religious values as the foundation of Romanian traditions. It did not matter that they mentioned they have no connection to the ortodox church and they do not actually support the church but they acknowledge the influence religion had on culture and the desire to preserve it. They even said they are not against same sex marriage but are for the encouraging of the traditional family since it actually increases the number of citizens. That did not stop the press to label them as homophobic alt-right extremist that want to go back to the middle ages. It did not help that they wanted to open the economy early.

Still, I'm happy that they exist.

This article is hilarious.

..."gender ideology" is a destructive force and totalitarian ideology, worse than Communism or Nazism. This is allegedly pushed by a secret cabal or foreign entities (such as the European Union, World Health Organization, or United Nations) for the purpose of weakening, undermining, or destroying families, the Catholic Church, the nation, or Western civilization.

Remove "allegedly" and it's just an everyday post on /pol/

Bill de Blasio put pedos next to elementary schools. The Tavistock Clinic was doing mass medical tranny experimentation on children, but was fortunately slapped down recently by reactionary judges. In Germany, Dr Kentler gave foster kids to pedos, and green movement founder Daniel Cohn-Bendit bragged about a child sex daycare. Globohomo's chomopomo prophets openly talk about their love of pedos:

These days, especially in America, boy-love is not only scandalous and criminal, but somehow in bad taste. On the evening news, one sees handcuffed teachers, priests and Boy Scout leaders hustled into police vans. Therapists call them maladjusted, emotionally immature. But beauty has its own laws, inconsistent with Christian morality. As a woman, I feel free to protest that men today are pilloried for something that was rational and honorable in Greece at the height of its civilization.

-Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae

any child old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate sit in somebody's lap or engage in sexual activity.

-Pat Califia, cited in Sexual Investigations by Soble

This notion of consent is a trap, in any case. What is sure is that the legal form of an intersexual consent is nonsense. No one signs a contract before making love... When we say that children are 'consenting' in these cases, all we intend to say is this: in any case, there was no violence, or organized manipulation in order to wrench out of them affective or erotic relations.

-Guy Hocquenghem, Sexual Morality and the Law, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws

Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation.

-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex, widely regarded as a founding text of Gay/Lesbian studies and Queer Theory

But pederasty is probably historically the most common form of homosexuality in Western culture, as well as many other cultures. It exists in all cultures, and in some is considered the norm, even today (e.g., Iran, among the Pashtuns). To label it 'child abuse' or 'child molestation' is preposterous and stupid.

-David Thorstad, rage email, president of both the Gay Activists Alliance and Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in NYC in the 1970s, founder of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), compared being a pederast in the US with being "a Jew in Nazi Germany"

It is not necessary to figure parent-child incest as a unilateral impingement on the child by the parent, since whatever impingement takes place will also be registered within the sphere of fantasy. In fact, to understand the violation that incest can be and also to distinguish between those occasions of incest that are violation and those that are not ­it is unnecessary to figure the body of the child exclusively as a surface imposed upon from the outside... The reification of the child’s body as passive surface would thus constitute, at a theoretical level, a further deprivation of the child: the deprivation of psychic life.

-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender, most influential living gender theorist. She sees incest taboo as working towards heteronormativity and asks that prohibition on incest be rethought to prevent the "violation" that is heteronormativity.

If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual ... then I would not call it pathological in any way.

-John Money, Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, psychologist who forced a boy to be a girl and get humped by his twin brother after a botched circumcision. Both of the Reimer brothers committed suicide.

But, after all, listening to a child, hearing him speak, hearing him explain what his relations actually were with someone, adult or not, provided one listens with enough sympathy, must allow one to establish more or less what degree of violence if any was used or what degree of consent was given. And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.

-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality, Pope of Chomopomo, most cited academic in grievance studies, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws

Other notable globohomo clergy:

Henry "Harry" Hay, pioneer in US Gay rights, founder of the first sustained gay rights group in the US. Supported NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) and marched in the pride parade with a "NAMBLA walks with me" shirt.

Magnus Hirschfeld founder in 1897 of an institute deemed "the first advocacy for homosexual and transgender rights", considered homosexual "ephebophiles" as something common and nonpathological.

Simone de Beauvoir, lesbian feminist superhero second to none, of "every woman is homosexual by nature" fame, was one of the signers of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws demanding "recognition of the right of children and adolescents to maintain relationships with persons of their choice". It was in reaction to three men being taken to trial for grooming boys and girls under 15 years of age, but allegedly "without violence".

Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California, of Oscar winning biopic about his life, and has a Navy ship named after him. Milk took advantage of his work with at-risk youth to groom at least one 16yo runaway Jack Galen McKinley who had substance abuse problems and lived on the streets of NYC (where the age of consent was 17). Jack would end up comitting suicide years later.

Pedowood is just the tip of pomochomo media:

Victor Salva's rape of his 12 year old actor is defended by intelligensia allies like John Edgar Browning.

Wikipedia is more pozzed than Charlie Sheen:

Rodney Reed raped a 12 year old and wikipedia covered it up for Shaun King's BLM bullshit.

tl;dr Not fucking children is somehow child abuse.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money

The only wikipedia article you need to know how fucking horrific gender theory actually is.

A sick bastard named Dr. John Money created specious notion of gender theory:

https://www.faith.org.uk/article/gender-theory-and-gender-ideology

The precise theory may be traced back to Dr John Money (1921-2006), a New Zealand psychologist who worked in the United States after the Second World War. He claimed that nurture not nature determines our sexual identity, that is, how you are raised and conditioned not the nature of your body. According to behaviourist theory, someone born as a boy could be turned into a girl by being raised as a girl – as long as he/she was never informed of his/her true sex.

Money also created the scourge of "transgenderism" which has now been unleashed upon Western civilization:

https://www.intellectualtakeout.org/article/john-money-david-reimer-and-dark-origins-transgender-movement/

P.S. My pronouns are: GO FUCK YOURSELF

ctrl+f "john money" 0 results

The anti-gender movement is an international movement which opposes what it refers to as "gender ideology", "gender theory", or "genderism".[1] These concepts do not have a coherent definition

I'll give you a coherent definition: If it thinks sex and gender aren't synonyms, then it ultimately comes from Dr. Money and it belongs in a garbage pile.

Note how, what was once normal mainstream is now described in adversarial methods.

Despite being the accepted norm and their attempts to seperate gender from sex being the actual movement, they phrase their movement and ideology as normal and the actual normal as an anti movement.

Darvo at its finest. They can now cite this wikipedia article, which barely cites the media.... Who.. Got this where... From the fringe ideology trying to normalise itself.

These concepts do not have a coherent definition

Wikipedia has an article that’s thousands of words long about gender studies.

This is just more of the same nonsense we’re seeing with the “great reset” and countless other things. They deny it exists to deboonk anyone who disagrees while simultaneously pushing for it.

Interesting snippet from the talk page as well - one of the editors has queried what they clearly see as a biased source, the response, in part, is:

only the content of reliable sources is. (And reliable sources need not be "neutral" or "impartial".)

So, we only allow in things with the stamp of ideological conformity reliability, and once we've deemed it ideologically compliant reliable, it can be as biased as it wants to be!