Unfortunately (c)(1) of Section 230 defines them as such, unconditionally. (c)(2) has some (vague) good faith conditions but the publisher v platform distinction is not something you can enforce based on Section 230 as written.
I learned as much in the last few Years. I still wonder what keeps news outlets from going this route. Anyone can register themselves and they just 'moderate' the shit out oglfnthe submissions so that miraculosly only their reporters get published.
Tadah, we are a platform now, now fuvking protect us from any liability whatsoever ..m
You say that but it's quite easy to memoryhole things that are inconvenient truths. Once the people who actually lived through the events stop documenting them, or are locked up for "hate speech" then people are none the wiser. This has happened before on a very large scale, but the internet exists now so it may be different.
This felt very, very bad. Like alarms should be going off in people's heads. The MSM doesn't report on things that are happening, ignores them, or gives them a couple minutes and puts an insane spin on it - but mostly they don't even report on it anymore, effectively censoring a political party and the actual sitting President of the United States.
But that's not enough for them, and now they have to start censoring anyone who disagrees, or has actual news? Even if it were the National fucking Enquirer, this is one of those history book moments of "Things got really bad when the main information transmission platform censored news and sitting politicians because they were ideologically biased."
Honestly, Bitchute or Rumble needs to step up their game, ASAP. All I see when I look at the Internet landscape these days is things splintering, making their own platforms, and now people are using them in small amounts, and growing on a regular basis. That didn't happen for years and years, maybe a decade or more? Before it was all about everyone using the same platforms: Youtube, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram, Facebook. Now people are leaving all of those places.
Not gonna lie, been eyeing alt tech for a while now and I might finally take the plunge over to bitchute or something, already typed down all channels worth following.
Brave, bitchute, parler, minds, win, ruqqus. I don't know of a good discord replacement, and payment processing is still a tough one outside of crypto.
Also Youtube: We are not a publisher but a mere plattform that impartially hosts user generated content.
Unfortunately (c)(1) of Section 230 defines them as such, unconditionally. (c)(2) has some (vague) good faith conditions but the publisher v platform distinction is not something you can enforce based on Section 230 as written.
I learned as much in the last few Years. I still wonder what keeps news outlets from going this route. Anyone can register themselves and they just 'moderate' the shit out oglfnthe submissions so that miraculosly only their reporters get published.
Tadah, we are a platform now, now fuvking protect us from any liability whatsoever ..m
They're going all in on trying to hide evidence so that they can deny its existence
Too bad bitchute and maga.host's video hosting exists. They will never get rid of the evidence. The Internet is forever.
You say that but it's quite easy to memoryhole things that are inconvenient truths. Once the people who actually lived through the events stop documenting them, or are locked up for "hate speech" then people are none the wiser. This has happened before on a very large scale, but the internet exists now so it may be different.
Youtube suppressing the literal truth, presumably to appease China. News at 11
If Trump makes his way to a second term, the salt is going to be unlike anything we have ever seen before.
So literally no change from before the election and we aren’t sold down the river to modern day nazi Germany yet? Sounds perfect.
Good. I think people are about fed up with their shit, let them try.
That's the point where I think you start to see families and neighbors start shooting at each other.
Because we don't intake soy.
This felt very, very bad. Like alarms should be going off in people's heads. The MSM doesn't report on things that are happening, ignores them, or gives them a couple minutes and puts an insane spin on it - but mostly they don't even report on it anymore, effectively censoring a political party and the actual sitting President of the United States.
But that's not enough for them, and now they have to start censoring anyone who disagrees, or has actual news? Even if it were the National fucking Enquirer, this is one of those history book moments of "Things got really bad when the main information transmission platform censored news and sitting politicians because they were ideologically biased."
Honestly, Bitchute or Rumble needs to step up their game, ASAP. All I see when I look at the Internet landscape these days is things splintering, making their own platforms, and now people are using them in small amounts, and growing on a regular basis. That didn't happen for years and years, maybe a decade or more? Before it was all about everyone using the same platforms: Youtube, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram, Facebook. Now people are leaving all of those places.
Streisand?
It's afraid.
Nasim Aghdam did nothing wrong
in Minecraft.
We didn't deserve her
It's like Wojiski takes the high score of zero as a personal insult.
...making them active participants in said criminal conspiracy to change the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election.
Not gonna lie, been eyeing alt tech for a while now and I might finally take the plunge over to bitchute or something, already typed down all channels worth following.
Shit it feels like doing a browser change.
Brave, bitchute, parler, minds, win, ruqqus. I don't know of a good discord replacement, and payment processing is still a tough one outside of crypto.
It's probably for the best. I'm gonna start looking at bitchute as well.
why, exactly, do you feel like you're allowed to do this?