Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

47
When you just found out that Trump took North Carolina (twitter.com)
posted 5 years ago by Norenia 5 years ago by Norenia +47 / -0
30 comments share
30 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (30)
sorted by:
▲ 15 ▼
– Smith1980 15 points 5 years ago +15 / -0

I’m not getting my hopes up. Can anyone tell me if I should be optimistic about his chances? I mean I think this election was fishy for sure.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– M1919A2 25 points 5 years ago +25 / -0

I think PA has a good chance of turning to Trump in the courts. They have statutes on when ballots have to be in by and judges can't change the law from the bench. But he's still going to need Georgia (which is in recount now) and then AZ, MI, or WI. I believe WI has a similar statute in place. AZ is going to come down to the wire, but I'm not sure he's going to narrow things down to trigger a recount. At least not automatically.

The other avenue open is if there is enough legal challenges in the air and states can't certify elections by the middle of December the selection of the president goes to the House as per Constitution and selected by State delegations which Republicans have a major of and could select Trump for another term.

The interesting thing is McConnell's position after meeting with Barr yesterday and coming out and saying they are going to fight along with Gramham and others. If those two are saying fight, there's likely something there there. Else they wouldn't risk blowback in future elections. They both are pretty swampy when it comes down to it.

But with as many races being flipped due to glitches in places like MI and statistical anomalies that even Real Clear Politics are reporting on now there's enough to warrant oversight by the courts. Now can they find the right judges to agree is another matter. But they'll rush things through the courts and SCOTUS can always issue a stay to keep states from certifying results.

Now if it goes to the House and Trump gets his second term all hell is going to break loose. The last time we came this close was 1960 when it was clear there was similar bullshit with JFK, but Nixon conceded "for the good of the country". This time it's different. You have 70 million Americans who are pissed and 50 Million of them who think this shit stinks. And these are NOT your parent's Republicans who would rather turn the other cheek, take the L, and "gosh darnit, better luck next time". Many of the people supporting Trump are blue collar, spent time in Unions and know how to do things like strike because that's how they've been taught to "fight the man". Only "the man" in the form of big corporations are now aligned with the democrats. And these men know how and will be willing to actually fight back in many ways. A truckers strike of just a few days would bring things to a halt.

If Trump supporters actual start coming out in the tens of thousands and take to the streets to protest over this I think a lot of things change very quickly. Whether they will or not...protesting isn't something that has been on the Republican's playbook out side of the right to life people and some limited success on the 2A side. But again, these aren't your parent's republicans either.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 30 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 30 points 5 years ago +30 / -0

At some point Reps have to realize they don't have the big city party machinery like the Dems do, and if they allow this fraud to happen it's only a matter of time before the cannon is fired at them.

This isn't some city-level thing: this was a multi-city, multi-state operation in coordination with the Post Office. Sure it was sloppy, but it's the first time they've tried something of this magnitude; and they'll get better at it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– APDSmith 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0

Agreed - though mine is an outside perspective, if this isn't at least pursued to the point where the scale and the scope of the fraud is identified I can't see any way for the US to reasonably claim "free and fair" elections going forward.

If the 2020 elections go down in the books as ones where everybody is confident of widespread fraud but it got dropped "for the good of the country" then who's to say the next one won't be run similarly, now with the benefit of a precedent for accepting fraud?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– deleted 13 points 5 years ago +13 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– Galean 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

I am a bit scared of what the leftist mob will do and have all the media including Fox declare him an illegitimate president. But I'm willing to live with that rather then with Kamala and the socialist party in power.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– censorthisss 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

They'll destroy their own cities and the local politicians will let them.

Fuck em

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Kingarthas2 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

This is what i hate, and a podcaster i listen to and love enough to throw 5 bucks a month his way (hey, i'm a poorfag) for extra episodes hates both, is deep into conspiracy theories but thinks biden will "take the foot off of the gas" but he also thinks trump pulling this off would be the absolute funniest shit ever.

I'm just not buying it. "for the good of the country" You let them get away with this and they are going to cement it and much worse, like capitulating to the mob is going to make them happy, these people are never happy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– TentElephant 16 points 5 years ago +16 / -0

I think Trump is ready to fight this to the bitter end, and ConInc is even starting to line up behind him. It's just a matter of having the right people in the right places to push things along because there are paths to victory through all three branches. The republicucks need the will to actually use the power they have. I look forward to Executive Order 13957. Purge, baby purge.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Gizortnik 15 points 5 years ago +15 / -0

Smart move purging parts of the Pentagon ahead of time. Trump seems to know what he's doing, even if the Republican establishment has to be dragged kicking and screaming into victory.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– almond_activator 8 points 5 years ago +8 / -0

Obama played the same game, pushing out every general officer he felt he couldn't 100% control. It's part of the role of commander-in-chief and part recognition of the influence the military wing of the military-industrial-congressional complex wields.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Gizortnik 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0

Difference is that I don't think Trump can 100% control any agency in the way that Obama is aiming for.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– almond_activator 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

The military doesn't need to be controlled. In its natural state, it is fairly conservative; the propaganda machine that drives recruitment into America's martial class is primarily grounded in the sanitized legends of its founding - the same one which is a unifying pillar of the right wing in general.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Gizortnik 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

the propaganda machine that drives recruitment into America's martial class is primarily grounded in the sanitized legends of its founding

Not sure what you mean by that. The 'martial class' isn't even supposed to be a thing. At the same time the actual founding of the military are all in the form of militias.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– almond_activator 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Military service runs in families, primarily in the working class and rural population. You're far more likely to meet a veteran who can list half a dozen family members who've served than one who says they're the first.

There may not be a formal caste system, but they're always drawing from the same pool of 'God, Guns, and George Washington' types.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 14 ▼
– Grumman 14 points 5 years ago +14 / -0

Before the election, there was a sudden uptick in interest in the penalties for election fraud in the three states the Democrats committed election fraud in. If Trump can get a court order/warrant for Google to disclose who made those searches, it will lead him straight to the criminals responsible.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– spezpedobestfriend 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0
permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– Grumman 16 points 5 years ago +16 / -0

That argument would be a lie, because you don't search for the penalties for election fraud if you're looking for good electoral practices. It would be like a doctor looking up the penalty for murder and claiming he wanted to make sure he performed heart surgery well.

And in any case, I'm only suggesting that this evidence be used to identify the criminals so that they can be subject to a more in-depth investigation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– spezpedobestfriend 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0
permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Grumman 14 points 5 years ago +14 / -0

Fraud is not malpractice, it is deliberate, malicious wrongdoing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– ArtemisFoul 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0

Of course it was fishy, I can smell it from all the way over here - but being (reasonably) optimistic is just a generally good, healthy mindset, or so I'm told.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

Can anyone tell me if I should be optimistic about his chances?

The elites will steal the election.

permalink parent save report block reply
View 3 more comments

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy