36
yeldarb1983 36 points ago +36 / -0

This election wasn’t about policy. It was about fundamental principles, and voters knew exactly what they were voting for. This was a clear choice between a candidate who pledged to defend America’s founding values, democracy and the rule of law and a populist demagogue who pandered to a sense of grievance and promised to bring down the price of groceries.

lost so hard...💀

5
yeldarb1983 5 points ago +5 / -0

miller brewing company had an ad campaign where they made some tongue-in-cheek jokes. they were pretty fun.

3
yeldarb1983 3 points ago +4 / -1

yeah, but they're technically targeting their core demographic; people with more money than good sense.

2
yeldarb1983 2 points ago +2 / -0

the early books are definitely more standard fantasy, though they inevitably take a turn for the tongue-in-cheek in later books. the auther didn't really want to do fantasy, but his publisher basically twisted his arm, lol

1
yeldarb1983 1 point ago +1 / -0

it's the game gamergaters on 4chan and reddit donated money to the production of, and what vivian james was originally designed for.

1
yeldarb1983 1 point ago +1 / -0

that's the one, lol.

it's okay, more of a light-hearted time-waster than something I'd pour hours into, but it's fun enough for what it is.

1
yeldarb1983 1 point ago +1 / -0

not yet, I suspect she either shows up randomly or else late stage in the game, though, and I haven't played that far.

2
yeldarb1983 2 points ago +2 / -0

well, one that popped into my head was a book in the Magic of Xanth "trilogy," by Piers Anthony. the book in question is Faun & Games, and if the title didn't clue you in, this is a world infested in puns, so you've been warned.

Basically the faun (think saytr, but not violent and rapacious) in question has to go to a moon orbiting the head of a sorceress, and then to another, and another, and another...(you get the idea) to find someone to replace a fellow faun and friend of his who was swallowed whole by an inescapable abyss to save his lost friends' tree.

Fair warning, the series is a bit on the risque side, though it steers clear of overt sex scenes, although the book has more than its fair share of titillating moments...

7
yeldarb1983 7 points ago +9 / -2

a general description of the conversation and a single, out of context screenshot....

Now...why am I skeptical that this is totes reel yo' and not somebody coaching the AI to get the desired outcome for attention?

2
yeldarb1983 2 points ago +2 / -0

depends on how broad of a comparison you want. The whole "worlds within worlds within worlds" concept has been around for decades, if not centuries.

3
yeldarb1983 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is why they're losing though...

As they get more and more extreme, much like a certain children's amusement device spinning faster and faster, more and more people get thrown off, until no one's left (no pun intended)

4
yeldarb1983 4 points ago +4 / -0

brianna wu

far-right

🎶ohhh, the merry-go-round broke down🎶

utter clowns...

3
yeldarb1983 3 points ago +3 / -0

the world wars really fucked a lotta people up. there was this attitude that through technological advancement, humanity would transcend our frailties, and well...nothing is ever that simple, but a lot of people couldn't accept that, so they swung in the other direction, basically deciding humanity was too sick to survive in its current form (see dadaism in art as an example). we're not on the third or forth generation of people bent on either transforming humanity or wiping it out entirely.

3
yeldarb1983 3 points ago +3 / -0

now that's a novel concept; finding a compromise between our base instincts and our higher selves. (for the record, I'm not being sarcastic.)

It makes sense on another level, because this country was founded on compromise. The Articles of Confederation were an unqualified failure, so the Continental Congress got to work, hammering out a new agreement, arguing and no doubt nearly coming to blows, but working out a compromise everybody could agree upon, even if reluctantly.

Hell, even the Declaration of Independence was signed when it became clear that the Crown was uninterested in hearing the Colonists out and instead demanded they be crushed under booted heel.

2
yeldarb1983 2 points ago +2 / -0

hard to believe, but she was actually pretty good looking at one point. . I mean, we're talking butterface, but yeah.

(and pretty based as well)

1
yeldarb1983 1 point ago +1 / -0

even in western stuff, I'd say there's nuance. If there's a story, for instance, that uses the trope of the "misunderstood demons" to push DEI bullshit, yeah, i'd say steer clear. (99% percent of the time, that's what's going on today)

But if it's just somebody trying to tell an interesting story, then it might be okay.

Generally speaking, it depends on the thrust of the story in question; is this person trying to push an agenda, or are they trying to tell an interesting (if controversial) story?

5
yeldarb1983 5 points ago +5 / -0

kinda doubt it's real, but eh, I could go fifty/fifty on it, honestly...

13
yeldarb1983 13 points ago +13 / -0

...If he actually had the balls to say this, I'd respect him just a little bit...

8
yeldarb1983 8 points ago +8 / -0

all of Europe wants me to vote for harris

I already voted for trump, you don't have to convince me anymore.

5
yeldarb1983 5 points ago +5 / -0

Classic Internet Tough Guy, except without the internet.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›