But if he ought to take it seriously, because it was said with power and intention to make this belief widespread in China, would it then be worse than an insult against all chinese people?
Also why can't a black African be chinese just as much as any other chinese person? What if that black person was born in China? Wouldn't he be chinese then? Why would that be offensive to say at all?
Why would it be offensive to say that there is no such thing as chinese people? Everyone can be a chinese person?
And why would it be worse than saying an insult against all chinese people?
I've been to Paris, but I haven't been to London or Chicago and it is the same thing. You can see it on videos, statistics, demographics and so on. You don't have to actually go to Paris or London to see the replacement migration happening.
You are claiming that non-whites are identitarian
Because they are. Islam is just another way of being identitarian.
there is not much point to 'whites' surviving if say they convert to Islam
Antiwhite
Oh please, people don't do that, and the non-Danes least of all.
Antidanish
Population replacement through immigration is a very bad thing, but it is not 'genocide'.
Yes it is.
By using that word, you discredit your own case, even though your opposition to immigration is very proper, and shared by me.
Let's call things what they are. The intended consequence of mass immigration is to replace the white population with nonwhites, ie white genocide.
That said, none of this has anything to do with race. Islamic savages are bad not because they are not white, for anyone sane will have just as much of a problem with Islamic savages who are white, but because of their religion.
You can call it culture, religion or other words if you want. The reason they want africans into Europe, muslims into Europe, mexicans into the US, blacks into the US, asians into the US, is because they are ways to replace whites in those countries, ie genocide whites in white countries through mass immigration.
You can call it whatever names, the methods are many, the goal but the same.
If you like western civilisation, then you should be in favor of whites getting identitarian, because culture stems from genetics, not ideas.
Western culture will be gone once whites are gone.
You don't see western culture in London, you don't see it in Chicago, you don't see it in Luton, you don't see it in Paris and so on.
Also I take offence with your choice of words "islamic savages". They are human beings, many lovely and kind with the best of intentions. It is not the fault of Islam that they have 85 IQ or commit a lot of crime. They are born that way and they don't deserve to be ridiculed because of that.
We are all put on this earth to live the best lives that we possibly can and hopefully to spread happiness to others around us.
Go to chicago, paris, london and so on and tell me how vibrant the White culture is in those places.
This is happening everywhere in the west:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGd5peYeebc
And that's Copenhagen which is not like those other places that I mentioned. I don't even hate those muslims in that video, I might even know a few of them or one of my friends could be in family with someone attending there.
But as much as I might like them, I could even love them, I don't want my people to go extinct. I don't want to see my culture gone.
This is false. Almost no one outside of your country thinks in racial terms.
Ethnic terms, religious terms, call it what you want. In Denmark we are socially forced to call nondanes "danes". A far right blogger proved that Danes will be a minority within the next 100 years due to mass immigration. How was this debunked by the media? By using the definition of Danes noted above; basically their argument was - without saying it explicitedly that Danes wont become a minority, because the immigrants that are replacing the Danes will be called Danes. This logic can only be due to malice and support of the genocide of Danes. No one is that stupid, especially because they knew what they were doing in their analysis and they deliberatedly hid this logic from the public.
Every nonwhite race thinks in racial terms.
Every nonwhite race promote politics that benefit their own race.
Politics that benefit nonwhite races are implemented because of that pressure.
Whites do not think in terms of race.
Whites do not push for politics that benefit their own race.
White push AGAINST any politics that benefit their own race.
Politics that benefit the white race are NOT implemented because of that pressure.
Whites end up as second class citizens as a result. In their own white countries, non the less.
Not only are whites second class citizens, we have given up our own control and power in our own white nations, which is resulting in the ongoing decade long genocide of whites across the west.
I don't know if it is "stupid" people who think in racial terms.
Whites are still the majority in the west and we can still rather easily take back power through legal means within a few years if we start thinking in racial terms.
Now of course, whites wont be allowed to take back power through legal means, precisely because nonwhites think in racial terms and only play by the rules to keep whites asleep. The moment whites fight back legally, we will experience the full power of the nonwhite races illegally, and within our own borders and with our own technology and with our own weapons and with our own institutions.
However while it is not a bright future for whites to fight against the other races, it is our only option.
The longer we wait, the longer we are color blind, the longer we give those who see us as enemies to take power. It is quite tragic that the other races are so racist, but they leave us with no choice.
We welcomed them with open arms and we were stabbed in the back and exploited.
"Yes, because then you have a civil war."
Yes, because whites are second class citizens who are not allowed to think in racial terms. If we did, those in control of the west would eliminate us. It is a bullying tactic. Either you accept white genocide slowly or we do it now.
If that's the case, then whites can't be racists because we do not hold power.
Take the Biden administration, whites are disproportionately underrepresented.
I wonder who is overrepresented. But if you point that out, then they switch up their logic, because it was never about "racism = prejudice + power", it was just about justifying their hatred of whites.