5
userman631 5 points ago +5 / -0

Because it used to be that they were able to use the constant stream of new releases that people actually care to consume to continue warping the minds of the populace to their goal. Not many people actually gives a shit about consooming the newest product compared to how things used to be. As is people are primarily consuming propaganda that is entire decades out of date and because of that we're no longer seeing generations as uniform in thought as they once were.

Things don't need to be "surprising" or allow for uncontrolled behavior in order to reach a baseline competence, you can point to numerous examples of effectively the same story being told while pushing the same agendas and some will be bafflingly bad and others are considered great.

There is a legitimate competency crisis with regards to media creation and it is not by design and this is only compounded when you consider that we have effectively surpassed technological limitations for movies and even gaming is barely held back. We have no meaningfully new technological developments to speculate on that haven't been done to death over the past 60 years beyond an ever encroaching security state which itself is prohibitive to stories that could be told

Your pessimism blinds you from being able to make detailed assessments. I'm not even saying any of this actually changes anything significantly, just that there seems to be a bit of an inability to manufacture new cultural events and touchstones even when it would be advantageous to do so.

23
userman631 23 points ago +23 / -0

What room is there for hope when our race is undergoing a slow genocide via immigration and our more fulfilling social interactions come from arguing on forums with people who might not even be real?

5
userman631 5 points ago +5 / -0

It doesn't even need to be, we lack any sort of distribution network

2
userman631 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fair enough, but the point stands that resources shouldn't be wasted without thought.

1
userman631 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I've been meaning to dig up some of my old lipos that I know are going to go off soon, problem is I can't for the life of me find the one I'm looking for and I've been looking for years.

2
userman631 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck off, the batteries are fine we don't need more regulations, shit happens.

3
userman631 3 points ago +3 / -0

Depends on the demographic in question.

I also don't approve of this dismissal of property damage. Even destroying your own functional property is needless, wasteful and having a negative impact on the greater market and should be criminalized for that reason alone. Property is a representation of capital and labor.

4
userman631 4 points ago +4 / -0

All women are worthless sluts if given even the slightest amount of freedom, they need to be made property.

Besides that money is the only way to even have a chance with a woman and women are only willing to date upwards.

6
userman631 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's because it's just adopted coonspeak that the "right" tried to force on us to make us sound less intelligence.

2
userman631 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hard times created the trannies by making it effectively impossible for the average man to get a woman.

2
userman631 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think you're a bit incorrect, the ideological side is a luxury belief but I see trannyism as a desperate last ditch mating strategy, unless you make women property again then trannies will continue to be a problem.

2
userman631 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not even that people like it, but that they're more likely to purchase and see something as a fair price if it's marked down. If it isn't then most people are just going to assume that the listed price is an inflated pre-sale price.

Most people aren't familiar enough with many markets to actually know what normal prices are and clothing especially is the sort of shit normal men buy maybe once every few years.

1
userman631 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. If you want to be a degenerate coomer with your socially awkward friends we have Apocalypse World for that.

6
userman631 6 points ago +6 / -0

A dark creature that stalks the night killing everything smaller than it for pleasure that has a name which if spoken is capable of sending 13% of the population into a murderous frenzy?

Sounds like a idea for a monster

3
userman631 3 points ago +3 / -0

...Are beholders just regular functional members of society now?

4
userman631 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why would the leadership of the Young Republicans be any different than the leadership of the Republican party?

5
userman631 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh no, not my hecking companies! We need to let private organizations undermine the greater good to please the false god of free markets!

1
userman631 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, you were talking about on camera behavior as though it was off camera

5
userman631 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm honestly disappointed we haven't seen more of these parasites getting killed over the years. They deserve it and so much worse. They get all this wealth to do fucking NOTHING and I'll die homeless and childless.

1
userman631 1 point ago +1 / -0

You realize this is on camera though right?

1
userman631 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tariffs are only beneficial if they're in place long enough and stable enough to build up industry, otherwise the consumer is just getting indirectly taxed for things that have no domestic alternative

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›