There doesn't seem to be anything new and exciting going on these days.
No fads taking everyone by storm. No new technology everyone is discussing (AI is pretty meh at the moment, especially with the censorship). No new entertainment everyone has to see.
Maybe I'm out of the loop but I don't feel I am. Anyone else kinda feel this way?
Because it used to be that they were able to use the constant stream of new releases that people actually care to consume to continue warping the minds of the populace to their goal. Not many people actually gives a shit about consooming the newest product compared to how things used to be. As is people are primarily consuming propaganda that is entire decades out of date and because of that we're no longer seeing generations as uniform in thought as they once were.
Things don't need to be "surprising" or allow for uncontrolled behavior in order to reach a baseline competence, you can point to numerous examples of effectively the same story being told while pushing the same agendas and some will be bafflingly bad and others are considered great.
There is a legitimate competency crisis with regards to media creation and it is not by design and this is only compounded when you consider that we have effectively surpassed technological limitations for movies and even gaming is barely held back. We have no meaningfully new technological developments to speculate on that haven't been done to death over the past 60 years beyond an ever encroaching security state which itself is prohibitive to stories that could be told
Your pessimism blinds you from being able to make detailed assessments. I'm not even saying any of this actually changes anything significantly, just that there seems to be a bit of an inability to manufacture new cultural events and touchstones even when it would be advantageous to do so.
They stopped needing to care about the quality of their propaganda once they had conquered all media distribution platforms. When it became impossible for anyone else to make their own media, the monopoly status allowed for the collapse in the expenditure of competence.
Totally is, though. They don’t need to produce quality if they’re the only ones producing. They just need to keep others from doing it,
Funny you should mention that. I came to the same conclusion some years ago. All technology we use today was prototyped, designed, theorized, or built no later than 1970. It’s literally all derivative of just those implantations already in place.
No, my utter lack of giving a shit about continuing to write things that…
…led me to the briefest of summaries of the circumstances rather than a broad-spectrum analysis, which allowed you to claim I don’t know what I’m talking about when instead I simply don’t care to say.
Lack of desire/necessity, not inability. They created everything you know today. Even tiny, insignificant pieces of propaganda, widespread throughout culture, were created by them and are complete lies. All the way up to things that people say and do every single day, created entirely by the hoax of Hollywood. They’re perfectly capable of doing it again when they need to. They simply don’t need to.
Within the next five years, we’re going to have:
They’re going to need new scripts for those. They will write them (already have). They will film them. They will distribute them. It will be on every channel, everywhere. Everyone will comply because there won’t be any chance to physically interact outside the system.
Imagine being five years out from global martial law and claiming “they lost the ability to create new narratives even when it’s to their advantage.” Amazing.
Pretty clearly false. the distribution networks were conquered long before the collapse of competence and interest and many of the largest social pushes were aided by a constant stream of new popular media but currently we're in a state where social pushes are riding on past reverberations from 20 years ago.
Not quite because people still need to chose to consume it rather than doing anything else. As is streaming services need the iconic media of the past generations to get people in the door, and sure a market wide push for removal or modification of old content would would but it would be far less noticeable had there not been this large gap of more recent media.
Well what else do you have to do? Rambling about things nobody cares about is my main hobby at the moment.
There is absolutely a desire to and there have been notable attempts that had they been done 20 years ago would have had twice as many eyes on them. Keeping culture current just gives many more levers to pull on for large scale effect but there doesn't seem to be much left to pull on at this point leaving the smaller scale and more viewer tailored propaganda as the primary means of controlling public opinion which while more effective generally does not completely devalue the old style of "event culture" as a tool.
Unless you're using "Hollywood" as a catchall for jews involved in any kind of media rather than film and TV I'm going to disagree. Hollywood is almost always late to the punch and unimpactful to culture at this point, the sort of small mannerisms you're describing are just a result of your typical nigslop being pushed on us by social media jews rather than traditional media jews. Same race, similar industries but still distinctly different and it's the mass media side that we are pointing out as lagging behind.
That's a political event, not a cultural one. If you're talking about mass entertainment media designed to warm people up to the idea then I'd say being 5 years off without any notable successes in the last few years(in terms of embedding themselves culturally) and nothing left to reliably draw interest would need the sort of brute force push you're describing just to achieve viewership.
Not "new narratives", new cultural events and touchstones, there is no reason not to have them when the production speed and spending for mass entertainment products have no slowed down. it used to be that there was a cultural cycle where the old would fade out and be replaced by the new but now it seems like despite no shortage of the new, there seems to be no way to capture mass audiences with a single product like there used to be.
You seem to suggest that every failing of our enemies is unworthy of even humoring the possibility of just because our loss is inevitable. Why even bother to engage if your view on conversation seems to be reductionist to the point of only ever pointing out the end result rather than discussing the few note worthy things that ever happen on the journey to our deaths.
The Internet, my man.
Imagine thinking there’s a distinction.
Imagine being five years out from a new cultural event and touchstone and thinking they’re incapable of creating them literally out of thin air.
Covid.
It’s like you’re purposely not paying attention or something. Why should anyone take you seriously? Our enemies haven’t failed in centuries. Why bother commenting when you can’t defend your worldview in any capacity whatsoever with any actual information?
This is why I don’t bother “talking” anymore. It’s all just communist brainwashing or meaningless bullshit that never gets implemented in anyone’s lives.
“Ooh there was a new goyslop thingy on the way to our grave! Let’s talk about it as we sit back and watch it happen!”
I’ve even given up quoting you properly, because what the fuck is the point when you’re going to claim the ignorant nonsense you’re claiming? If you were right, why is no one doing a goddamned thing in the way you claim? It’s just not happening.
Are you arguing that before the internet there was actual competition or are you suggesting that the internet created competition briefly? Because I'd argue adoption of the internet correlated with lower quality.
Political events relate to change in policy(hard power) and the theatrics surrounding it presented as real, cultural events are widely consumed products and pushes to mold the thought of the populace(traditional soft power) sold as works of entertainment.
just because there has been a decline in the effectiveness of traditional soft power does not mean that hard power is not effective, nor does it mean that the modern soft power of a curated experience isn't more effective than the traditional methods ever were.
I'll believe it when I see it. The age of mass entertainment is dead.
Pushed via forced and basically nothing of lasting note came out at that time in the media sphere pretty shitty example.
Absolute insanity. There has never been so much as a setback in even one aspect of anything in centuries? What I'm bringing up here isn't even so much a failure as it is just a shift in technology and what can be achieved.
Not like I have anything else to do
The whole point of this thread is that there really isn't any new goyslop thing that is widely popular for people to discuss as we sitback and watch our genocide. I
They are though, what do you even think I'm claiming? Because really all I've said is that individual pieces of media aren't getting the numbers and having the effect they used to. Not much is memorable, not much is referenced positively in retrospect at anywhere near the frequency that used to happen. The only effects I'm claiming are minor things that are made irrelevant by both hard power and the modern forms of soft power.
He’s probably an fucking rodent looking like himself trying to doompost because he’s knows the Jews have completely lost the narrative and people are actively starting to name the Jew which causes kevching you see here
That's not even on the topic of the thread though. It's not that people are turning away from Jewish media as a whole but rather that there are no longer frequent singular pieces of media that receive widespread consumption and memorability.
Shalom goyim
Hi, jew. Do you… have something to add?
Yeah every tread you are one you are all do and gloom. I kind of hard of not to think you are some subversive type whether you are or not a Jew. You just want everyone to lay down and simply die, without trying to do anything .