They stopped needing to care about the quality of their propaganda once they had conquered all media distribution platforms. When it became impossible for anyone else to make their own media, the monopoly status allowed for the collapse in the expenditure of competence.

Pretty clearly false. the distribution networks were conquered long before the collapse of competence and interest and many of the largest social pushes were aided by a constant stream of new popular media but currently we're in a state where social pushes are riding on past reverberations from 20 years ago.

Totally is, though. They don’t need to produce quality if they’re the only ones producing. They just need to keep others from doing it,

Not quite because people still need to chose to consume it rather than doing anything else. As is streaming services need the iconic media of the past generations to get people in the door, and sure a market wide push for removal or modification of old content would would but it would be far less noticeable had there not been this large gap of more recent media.

No, my utter lack of giving a shit about continuing to write things that…No one will ever read No one will act on No one genuinely cares about, and therefore will never change their behavior over …led me to the briefest of summaries of the circumstances rather than a broad-spectrum analysis, which allowed you to claim I don’t know what I’m talking about when instead I simply don’t care to say.

Well what else do you have to do? Rambling about things nobody cares about is my main hobby at the moment.

Lack of desire/necessity, not inability. They created everything you know today. Even tiny, insignificant pieces of propaganda, widespread throughout culture, were created by them and are complete lies.

There is absolutely a desire to and there have been notable attempts that had they been done 20 years ago would have had twice as many eyes on them. Keeping culture current just gives many more levers to pull on for large scale effect but there doesn't seem to be much left to pull on at this point leaving the smaller scale and more viewer tailored propaganda as the primary means of controlling public opinion which while more effective generally does not completely devalue the old style of "event culture" as a tool.

All the way up to things that people say and do every single day, created entirely by the hoax of Hollywood. They’re perfectly capable of doing it again when they need to. They simply don’t need to.

Unless you're using "Hollywood" as a catchall for jews involved in any kind of media rather than film and TV I'm going to disagree. Hollywood is almost always late to the punch and unimpactful to culture at this point, the sort of small mannerisms you're describing are just a result of your typical nigslop being pushed on us by social media jews rather than traditional media jews. Same race, similar industries but still distinctly different and it's the mass media side that we are pointing out as lagging behind.

Within the next five years, we’re going to have: One major regional war involving NATO The total collapse of all financial institutions worldwide and the reconstruction of all economies into a single global digital-only currency tied directly to your personal ID.They’re going to need new scripts for those. They will write them (already have). They will film them. They will distribute them. It will be on every channel, everywhere. Everyone will comply because there won’t be any chance to physically interact outside the system.

That's a political event, not a cultural one. If you're talking about mass entertainment media designed to warm people up to the idea then I'd say being 5 years off without any notable successes in the last few years(in terms of embedding themselves culturally) and nothing left to reliably draw interest would need the sort of brute force push you're describing just to achieve viewership.

Imagine being five years out from global martial law and claiming “they lost the ability to create new narratives even when it’s to their advantage.” Amazing.

Not "new narratives", new cultural events and touchstones, there is no reason not to have them when the production speed and spending for mass entertainment products have no slowed down. it used to be that there was a cultural cycle where the old would fade out and be replaced by the new but now it seems like despite no shortage of the new, there seems to be no way to capture mass audiences with a single product like there used to be.

You seem to suggest that every failing of our enemies is unworthy of even humoring the possibility of just because our loss is inevitable. Why even bother to engage if your view on conversation seems to be reductionist to the point of only ever pointing out the end result rather than discussing the few note worthy things that ever happen on the journey to our deaths.