1
superspathi 1 point ago +1 / -0

A christian nationalist is somebody who wants to live in a christian theocracy. The ones I've encountered online seem to want to turn the USA into such a place where there is no freedom of religion. You're either willing to accept their "biblical" interpretation of rules or get physically removed.

I interpret their enmity from comments I've seen here and on Gab. There's nothing official or scientific about any of this, just an impression. Like I pointed out a passage from the bible calling for the killing of non-believers, and got responses saying, "guess we'd better get to work then". That kind of thing.

0
superspathi 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah that's fair. I don't forgive harm on me either, which is plainly what christian nationalists want for all non-christians. So that makes you my enemy, and what you want of no consequence.

-7
superspathi -7 points ago +1 / -8

I support the free speech rights of anyone who would reciprocate and support my free speech. The "Christ is King" people don't support the right of non-christians to exist at all, much less speak. So they can fuck right off.

-14
superspathi -14 points ago +2 / -16

While I would like to support the free speech rights of christians, their seething hatred of anyone that doesn't parrot their dogma makes me more inclined to laugh and say "suck it".

11
superspathi 11 points ago +11 / -0

Makes me want to murder a bunch of niggerfaggots. No really. They'd get better results by letting us racist assholes harmlessly vent. They're not fighting hate they are stoking it.

2
superspathi 2 points ago +6 / -4

Thats as nutty as the faggot wanting to end capitalism by leaving the capitals. Jesus does not exist as a being that could be a monarch. He exists in your mind. You want your imaginary friend to be the head of state.

5
superspathi 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sounds like the only criminal here is the DA for violating the first amendment rights of eighth graders.

3
superspathi 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wear a balaclava and dome some pigs. Thats how the serious people do things. Thats what earns respect. Pure terror.

1
superspathi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I can see that as a valid argument. I can also see the argument they ended up selecting that they didn't want to shut off player choice. I really didn't find it overbearing. You hit a certain rep with the companion and there is an option to initiate romance dialog, and an option to keep things friendly. They don't force you to engage in gay bear sex.

-3
superspathi -3 points ago +7 / -10

Don't listen to these fucking faggots. BG3 is a great game. All the companions are open to romance with any sex player character, but only one of them comes across as overtly gay because of the obnoxious voice actor being a huge flamer. But you don't have to let that fag in the party. You can outright murder the fucker if you want. Same for every other NPC in the game. Some people have murdered all the NPCs. There's a few gay npcs scattered through the game but there's nothing in the plot or gameplay that is particularly woke. It's a typical fantasy RPG game where you go around doing tactical battles blowing goblins up with fireballs and shit.

8
superspathi 8 points ago +8 / -0

Bitch is right. I do not care enough about her wet hole to put up with her shit.

4
superspathi 4 points ago +5 / -1

That's a tired old argument that the only source of morality is the rules laid down by a supernatural creator. It's very creepy to think about because it implies that the only thing preventing the religious people from being murderous raping fiends is their fear of punishment in an afterlife.

Personally I'm with Hans Hermann-Hoppe and his theory of argumentation ethics. Which could be summarized that the act of arguing with someone presupposes that both participants in the argument own themselves. And if that assumption of self ownership exists it also implies that using force to deprive that person of their self-ownership (rape, murder, theft) would not be ethical.

4
superspathi 4 points ago +4 / -0

You have to set emotions aside and analyze the numbers. My current mortgage interest is around 3%. I can buy treasury bills that yield 5%. That's a guaranteed 2% profit I can earn for borrowing money on my house. And that's t-bills. I get a lot more than that from my stock portfolio. Hmm, pay off my 40 year mortgage tomorrow, or leave the money in my etrade account where in 5 years there's enough money there to buy 5 houses outright. Which feels better?

3
superspathi 3 points ago +5 / -2

Bad debt is taking a vacation in Paris on a credit card.

Good debt is getting a bank loan to buy a work truck that you will use in a construction business to generate all the income you need to live and pay off the loan.

5
superspathi 5 points ago +6 / -1

Most companies adjust pay based on where the worker lives. That's what happened to me when I went remote. Took a 30% pay cut.

2
superspathi 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, that's bullshit. The one person middle class salary is around $100k, so $200k for a couple.

26
superspathi 26 points ago +26 / -0

"Masculine republics give way to feminine democracies, and feminine democracies give way to tyranny". -Aristotle

24
superspathi 24 points ago +24 / -0

It's not the homogeneity that makes for a high trust society. It's the absence of you know who. Haiti is very homogeneous. They don't have honor system stores there either.

30
superspathi 30 points ago +30 / -0

They should physically remove us. Globohomo is toxic.

22
superspathi 22 points ago +22 / -0

Why can't we be like Japan and physically remove assholes?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›