You'd rather that Amazon gatekeep their store more? Just let it be. It only has 122 reviews and who knows how many of those are bots. Only the rabid will read this anyway.
In a series of 28 brief arguments, she deftly makes the case for moving the abortion debate away from controlling and legislating women’s bodies and instead directs the focus on men’s lack of accountability in preventing unwanted pregnancies.
She believes women are oppressed and since oppression is a bad thing, her solution is to oppress men instead. Foolish.
In a utopian future, all work would be the domain of machines whether taking the form of robots or operating virtually over the internet, leaving humans to lives of leisure.
A life of only leisure wouldn't be utopian. People with too much time often destroy themselves.
Thanos wanted the infinity stones, which can make anything true, to wish half the universe to die. In the movies, he did this to curb overpopulation so that the universe's resources wouldn't be drained. After he succeeded, he destroyed the stones.
For resources to run out they have to be finite. His idea is stupid because populations would rise again to previous levels in a few centuries, so nothing would be accomplished beyond delaying the inevitable for a geologically insignificant time. Since things will run out anyways, all he's doing is making people more miserable by killing the survivors' loved ones.
Apparently, in the comics, he loved the goddess of death or something, and he wanted to create death as a tribute to gain her love.
Communism (as a movement), which is what you're referring to rather than marxism, shares with liberalism something far more important than an analysis of society, which is equality. It is due to said equality that heresies such as racism, homophobia, transphobia, etc originated and spread in society, specifically equality of liberal individuals. This is also fairly evident with normalization of "choose your own gender" larp that's also pushed on kids, along with making it so anyone can be a woman, man, removing references to gender, choosing personal pronouns, etc, but also various other things. Most of it serves two purposes, some ideological, most capitalist (consumerism, more control, expanding markets, atomization, etc).
Communism was the original marxist thought, because Marx was absolutizing the idea of the economic man. Communism is about economy. Cultural marxism is an abstraction of original marxism, as I said.
Not really, it's entirely built on liberalism, it's merely (...) [an] attempt to fulfill the potential of values such as equality (...)
Equality is a nebulous word nowadays. As far as equality of outcomes go, that's a marxist invention.
"cultural marxism" which serves as mystification of reality,
Nonsense. It's a perfect description of the term.
I won't debate liberalism.
Marxism espouses a worldview of proles vs the bourgeoise. Ones are victims and the other oppressors. Cultural marxism is an abstraction of the original, away from the mere economic and into racism, sexism and anything, really. Instead of proles and bourgeoise, you have black and white people, gay and straight, women and men, etc. The narrative, worldview, and means of dealing with the problem are the same as in marxism, hence cultural marxism. The philosophical wankery that birthed it was based on marxist thought, made by marxist philosophers. It's the best name for the ideology: "cultural marxism" is exactly what it is.
Fentanyl is like a stronger heroin. Apparently it's cheaper than cocaine, and more addictive. It makes sense to want to add it to cocaine to boost addiction and sales.