12
jrbelmont 12 points ago +15 / -3

Bingo. As far as I can tell the rate of actual full on homosexuality in every major society has always remained stable right around 10%, with the rate of genuine transgenderism being around 1% or so.

Which makes sense if there's a biological underpinning to this, a quirk of neurology that wasn't detrimental enough to tribal survival that it never got passed on. An old gritty-reboot comic of The Flinstones actually hit on an accidentally based approach to this, suggesting that in prehistory gay people would have served as non-breeding members of the tribe who still contributed and cared for children and the elderly.

6
jrbelmont 6 points ago +6 / -0

They were, but as Tentacle Monster pointed out there was judicial dispute over whether the FTC had the authority to specifically seek monetary relief for people.

3
jrbelmont 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the edited version, the original talks about SJWs and academics.

1
jrbelmont 1 point ago +1 / -0

You should read this (fair warning, long). It goes into quite a bit of what was happening behind the scenes. Mattis was literally being paid by China when he shit on Trump over China.

1
jrbelmont 1 point ago +1 / -0

Depends. There were a lot more white peopel than jews in the Weather Underground, does that mean something? Leftists like her also support mass murder against the much larger majority of jews that they hate.

2
jrbelmont 2 points ago +2 / -0

People like Fragarach are just SJWs from the other direction. They're still basing every decision and judgment they make off the race of people involved, they just rank people differently in the oppression olympics.

Fragarach's no different than Matsuda, he just switches which name goes where in the sentence.

1
jrbelmont 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm more forgiving of my own kind because 99% of all media is specifically designed to make white people hate themselves.

I'm willing to bet you don't extend that same rationale to jews, even though 99% of all media is specifically designed to make jews hate themselves and believe they're white european settler-colonialists who are even worse than the Nazis. Whenever SJWs talk about the patriarchy or oppressors they ultimately mean jews at the top.

3
jrbelmont 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unions are one of the original examples of a good thing getting corrupted. There's an enormous power differential between employers and employees, especially today when the job market is increasingly dominated by a handful of megacorporations. On paper unions help employees work together to balance that out. In practice they've been corrupted from the inside out and are basically just a reflection of the same system that the "management class" and "political class" have.

3
jrbelmont 3 points ago +3 / -0

And then the tech and media giants will claim they're violent trump-inspired insurrectionists and far right domestic terrorists and justify an even worse government crackdown.

The far left understands optics and communications. Everyone else needs to catch up. They need to start having tons of gopros recording these events from all angles, as many people livestreaming on as many different platforms as the local cell towers can handle, and preemptively get the word out about violence against them.

-2
jrbelmont -2 points ago +3 / -5

Didn't even need to wait for the resident "jews are always the bad guys" crowd to come out. The arab league and USSR really got a great return on their financial investment in the US education system and media with this one.

You guys ever stop to consider that maybe, just like there's white SJWs and white anti-SJWs, jews have the same thing going on?

1
jrbelmont 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not pedantry to point out that you're literally posting word salad.

1
jrbelmont 1 point ago +1 / -0

So what you're saying here is not only can you not count, but you can't read either:

Each generation pays to take care of the ever-growing population of non-working elderly who nowadays live longer than ever with more health problems than ever....

There's just no way to handle [declining population] without completely changing the entire economic system to something like UBI, or alternatively we discover some kind of limitless cheap energy.

I literally went so far as to place "UBI" as a solution on the same level as discovering limitless cheap energy. That's literally saying "The only way this is going to work is with fucking magic".

You should learn how to count and how to read before calling people retards and commies.

1
jrbelmont 1 point ago +1 / -0

You won't beat them with any one ideology thats treated as "The One True Path" because they'll just find an exploitable weakness in any framework and get to work.

The only way to beat them is by recognizing ideologies as tools and guidelines that need to be able to adapt to changing circumstances and threats.

1
jrbelmont 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're using words you don't remotely understand. International tariffs have no bearing on McRonalds paying people on a card system that fucks them over just for trying to check their own balance.

1
jrbelmont 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about you fuck off with being too stupid to count? I literally just explained to you in plain english why each generation needs to be larger than the prior one and pay more into the system.

You physically can not keep the current retirement system going without that, and if you go 100% privatized and abolish social security entirely you just make the problem even worse because then people need to have 10 kids to support them in their old age again.

Nobody's talking about seizing the means of production, we're talking about fucking basic math.

2
jrbelmont 2 points ago +3 / -1

A majority of women are casually to strongly anti-feminist and recognize it for what it is, just like a majority of non-whites see straight through SJWs.

1
jrbelmont 1 point ago +1 / -0

Feminism and wokeness are the same thing. The only difference is how much power they've managed to accumulate.

7
jrbelmont 7 points ago +8 / -1

But it's all the jews fault can't you see that? The UN even said so, the only reason arab men rape and abuse women is because of zionism!

1
jrbelmont 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is because the same process that's killed the left before our eyes has already finished killing the right from the inside out. Conservatism doesn't know what it's conserving, it doesn't stand for anything anymore, it's just a reflection of what progressivism is currently doing.

Some people have finally figured that out and realised that to save the right they need to actually go back to thinking about things. They're starting to figure out that just blindly shouting "socialism" and "free market" and "big government" is no better than the left's cries of "capitalism" and "racism". That it's ok to say that the free market needs to actually serve something, rather than mere corporate anarchy being an end in and of itself.

3
jrbelmont 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem is that the entire world's economy is based on a pyramid scheme. Each generation pays to take care of the ever-growing population of non-working elderly who nowadays live longer than ever with more health problems than ever.

Modern society already has "managed decline", almost every single culture on earth naturally winds up at or below replacement level when it reaches a post-industrial stage in economic development.

There's just no way to handle that without completely changing the entire economic system to something like UBI, or alternatively we discover some kind of limitless cheap energy.

6
jrbelmont 6 points ago +8 / -2

Women are good for a lot more than just babies, just as men aren't good at absolutely everything humans can do.

The male nature is competitive, aggressive, driven, and systemizing. It views the world in terms of its component parts. Resources, threats, goals, and tasks.

The female nature other hand is all about cooperation, nurturing, coalition building, and emotional validation. It views the world in terms of the connections between people, emotions and communication, and ensuring needs are met on more than just an immediate tangible level.

Both of these are necessary for a healthy society, and for a healthy individual. An insufficency or excess of either is dysfunctional.

You see this with children. Mothers stand between their children and new people or things, men stand behind them once it's established there's no threat. The cliche mother says "don't hang from the monkeybars like that, it's too high". The cliche father says "If you fall that's going to hurt".

In a healthy balance the mother knows to give her children warnings but allow them to make their own mistakes, and the father knows when they fall to first offer comfort and security and then when they calm down tell them they're a dumbass and know better for next time. In an unhealthy balance the mother smothers her child, and the father callously tells them to get over it.

1
jrbelmont 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's plenty immoral with that when you've got a rigged system where people are trapped relying on payday loan places because their paychecks and bills don't line up.

Just like there's plenty immoral with situations like when McDonalds was paying people on cards that charged them outrageous fees just to check the balance, or when the only way someone can cash their paycheck (since they're too poor to open a bank account) is from someplace that takes some exorbitant percentage.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›