Got it, but just want to add that the dogs are having the time of their life.

Taking down large prey is what they live for.

East Asians have Neanderthal and also Denisovan DNA.

"That truth will upend all established order across the entire world. If you do this, there's no undoing it."

Probably a metaphor for Epstein files.

If the dog wasn't there their human partner would be sent in. And if their human partner got stabbed and killed they'd also be upset.

There's no inconsistency, they're going to send somebody after the criminal. First one in is the one that does it for the love of the kill, whether dog or roided up human.

Have some sympathy for the cops. Would you want to go in first against a 250 lb guy on drugs? Who wants to do that. Send the dog in.

They go in first with a stun gun and they're on social media as the 'bad guy' instead of the violent criminal. Let the dog be the bad guy.

Always sympathy for the criminal, that's modern society's biggest problem.

Don't be a criminal? Or when the police catch you say "ok you got me" and take your day in court like a human being?

"They entrapped me by making me commit a crime and then act like a subhuman"

Sure..

Good. If they're sending the dog after you then you should be put on an island anyway so the more charges the better.

Unless the US law says if you've been convicted in another country you have to register as one in US.

Which it does.

It's just spurned lovers that feel like Trump betrayed them even though they should have known the whole time.

If Trump was blackmailed why would Israel keep having to attack Iran to keep the war going? So Trump can save face by having Israel be even more hated? Blackmail theory makes no sense.

I think it's much simpler. Iran says they want to kill Trump, Democrats will surely help them, so Trump is taking out Iran.

If either party candidate runs on anti-Israel or even anti-Jew they'll win in a landslide.

But will anyone in the primaries have the balls to.

Claude been trained on that specific example, no doubt.

They all still fail to even really simple things that are actually new.

Asmongold just got a week suspension for saying he doesn't give a shit what ignorant third-worlders think.

Twitch: "Ackchyually not ALL third-worlders are ignorant"

That's how low the bar is to getting deplatformed. If you're not banned from Jewtube or Kvitch you're not saying anything real.

I'll recommend one that's not great but never comes up in these things.

Lois and Clark: New Adventures

It's from the before time, young Teri Hatcher, and it's just a fun family friendly type show.

Whenever Lindsay comes up I like to point out that Peter Boghossian is still out there actually listening to people and getting people to talk to each other.

And being respectable.

Point being I don't think Lindsay should even get any credit for the Sokal^2 thing; dude was carried big time on that.

I asked what you thought I said, because you obviously didn't read what I wrote.

Once again, you can't even comprehend what you read.

This entire thread here is you not understanding what you read.

It was on his Microsoft Surface Pro.

Basically they could have sent a monkey up there so they're already on their phones to play gotcha games.

I already made the points in the first comment and reply. Go back and read them you absolute retard.

If you want help understanding English, rephrase here what you believe I said in those comments, I'll explain how you failed at reading a second time, and maybe you'll finally get it. But I doubt it.

Oh my god. You're even dumber than AntonioOfVenice, which is actually impressively dumb.

Learn to read, idiot. I didn't say that.

You realize that I'm not Trump posting here anonymously, right??

You have the reading comprehension of a snail. Jesus Christ. A Markov chain is smarter than you.

It doesn't you absolute retard.

I asked what you thought Trump meant.

Rhetorical of course because obviously you thought he was saying "no wars bc wars stupid".

Because you're bad at reading comprehension. For example, how I asked what Trump meant and you thought I was stating I thought Iran war wasn't stupid.

You realize you're proving my point right? Your comment is almost literally "all wars are stupid, he said no wars!"

Trump hasn't changed his positions since before 1988 Oprah interview, you just heard what you wanted to hear.

And no self-reflection on what you did wrong to convince yourself of that or why even on a semi-anonymous forum you can't admit you were wrong.

So when Trump said his wars wouldn't be stupid wars what exactly did you think he was saying?

It's total gibberish to you because you weren't listening - that's exactly my point. We agree.