1
dekachin 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes, the 1960s began the 1st lib wilding, roughly 1965 to 1970.

we are now in the 2nd lib wilding, 2012 to present, hopefully the end point being in 2024-25.

2
dekachin 2 points ago +2 / -0

unfortunately Twitter just started blocking people who aren't logged in, hence why I switched to a nitter link this time.

7
dekachin 7 points ago +7 / -0

You sue them everywhere.

If high schools are racist in giving blacks accolades, you sue the high schools.

It's not hard. The libs showed us the blueprint on how to do it in the 1960s to the present.

All we need to do is turn their lawfare tactics back around on them & utterly destroy them wherever they hide until they finally become too AFRAID to play racist games.

future lawsuits will be much harder to litigate.

Not at all.

All you need is right wing juries.

If you were on a jury would you let the libs get away with some bullshit? Of course not. You'd fucking hammer them. As would I.

We take back the Red States 1st, establish a baseline for what "not racist" looks like by using a conservative state model example. Then we look at the disparities & can see quite clearly where the blue racism hides. Then we hammer that nationally.

It's not a hard fight to win conceptually, it's just going to take a lot of years & effort to hammer the libs into submission.

Satisfying work.

10
dekachin 10 points ago +10 / -0

She says at the beginning "restricting presidential war powers authority"

You couldn't tell because she kept just hyperventilating about "queer niggas" constantly.

If you watch to the end of the video, her opponents were also 2 ghetto blacks, 1 of whom was joking about having just got out of jail.

This is what lib societal destruction looks like. Literal freak show.

11
dekachin 11 points ago +11 / -0

It's an incredibly stupid change & needs to be reversed.

People need to be able to link Twitter outside of Twitter in other places like reddit, here, etc.

Trying to force people to sign up to use a site is a terrible move & huge asshole move. Not even Youtube does that.

3
dekachin 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's weird because I go hard every day shitting on libs.

One thing you need to watch out for is keywords. So if you had just typed "cret1n" or 𝕔𝕣𝕖π•₯π•šπ•Ÿ probably nothing would have happened.

Also generally good policy to avoid name calling & any content in general that is "I'm angry & want to vent & lash out".

14
dekachin 14 points ago +14 / -0

I guarantee you that these women will be given automatic admission into the Ivy League school of their choice, & then recruited into Democrat political office soon after.

These are the new woke elites. This is the woke ideal. This is what affirmative action was for.

27
dekachin 27 points ago +27 / -0

Sexual degenerates stole our word "marriage" & now they want to steal our word "love" to describe their mental illness & sexual depravities.

46
dekachin 46 points ago +46 / -0

Yeah he's quoting the dissent & the majority explicitly stated that "no, you can't just discriminate with a loophole, the dissent is wrong & isn't authority".

The libs won't comply. They will need to be sued dozens of times in favorable jurisdictions & hit with heavy judgments until they get so blasted with lawsuits that they finally cave in & switch to a merit-based racially blind system out of fear of lawsuits.

It will take at least 5-10 years to get to the point where we see a real end to racism in college admissions.

1
dekachin 1 point ago +1 / -0

What would be an example of that?

Principles? The founding of the US & US Constitution. Did a very good job of taking some ragtag colonies & turning them into the most powerful country in the world.

Saying that you want to ban ballot harvesting (strategy) but using it while it is allowed (tactical)?

Yes that works.

I recently read his book.

I'm trying to have my girlfriend read it. I took a pic of her with the book on the beach but it was probably too lewd for him to retweet. XD

I'd rather have China be a peer competitor so that we can play off the US against China, to our benefit.

Everyone thinks that until they actually deal with China & realize how much China sucks & wants to just be a bully Han ethnostate empire that kicks everyone around & throws a hissy fit over trivial things.

the establishment is far more valuable than GOP populists.

I think populism is the dominant force in the GOP now. Trump & DeSantis are both fighting over the populist vote while Pence & Haley are pandering to the elites with their joke tier polling numbers.

How does his youth give him 30 years? It's not as if president is a lifetime appointment.

8 years as President then decades more in Congress &/or other high level roles as leader of the Party.

For now. I agree that DeSantis is very good, except on foreign policy (where he is still better than most GOP), and I hope he remains that way.

+1 I believe he will keep on winning.

I think the neocons are very happy for us 'stealing' that money, because it gives the US all the more leverage over us. That is the reason European foreign policy is dictated by the US.

I don't think we got anything for our money except to fight Europe's wars for it.

Neocons wanted it because 1) they are libs & love Europe 2) they vacation & have friends in europe & want their asses kissed. They trade billions in US taxpayer dollars so they can get flattery.

$33 billion is pocket change to the neocons.

libs spending other people's money for their benefit.

Eh, no one kisses their asses.

They do! Liberal EU elites absolutely flatter the shit out of visiting US neocon policy elites.

1
dekachin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I saw this study a while back where researchers had periodically polled women over the last 100 years or so about which traits they valued most in men.

The "good man" traits dominated before the 1960s. The "bad boy" traits increasingly dominated after. Why?

  1. easy no fault divorce made women more willing to pick high risk husbands.

  2. feminism made women more ambitious & reckless.

  3. feminism reduced women wanting kids & therefore caring about good father traits.

  4. materialistic society made women chase the most "trophy" men, highly stimulating, who would cause envy among their friends.

These men know their value & routinely fuck women but refuse to commit to them. So while some of these women snag a "bad boy" & get what they wanted, the vast majority do not.

Then if they ride the cock carousel through their 20s & hit the wall, by their 30s they panic, shift towards risk-adverse, & suddenly shift their priority to financial security & stability = a "nice guy" with a good job.

1
dekachin 1 point ago +1 / -0

At the end of the day I can't get blinded by partisanship. I gave the left a fair hearing on Ray Epps & they convinced me. I think that 60 minutes episode was fair & convincing enough. Again, it's not a really big issue for me so I'm not going to go hard on it as some other people here. I think there are much bigger scandals.

1
dekachin 1 point ago +1 / -0

The question is: who lost more?

Russia lost more as you'd always expect from being the attackers, though the K:D ratio was less favorable than other places once Bakhmut was surrounded on 3 sides.

Ukraine has plenty of manpower & isn't going to lose on manpower grounds. Also it didn't have its best units there anyway. So Russia could keep doing that strategy over & over & it would never really get anywhere. Ukraine isn't going to run out of people.

Only way I see for Russia to win is to focus on the artillery war not infantry battles & win by massively outproducing the West on artillery ammo until Ukraine is too ammo starved to keep up its defenses.

The lying media is now reporting that Surovkin has been arrested because of the Wagner probe, which just fills me with such utter despair.

I am skeptical of this as well. Surovkin is unfortunately associated with Prigozhin & thus not favored by Shiogu, who is clearly the winner in this whole debacle. So Shiogu might be using Wagner as an excuse to take out Surovkin. Maybe he will be reassigned out of the war.

Do they really make the decisions though? With Trump, we saw that no matter who's in charge, the neocons always remain in charge. And Obama continued the neocon Victoria Nuland's reign even though she was a Cheney hack.

Trump was an idiot who didn't know how to put together an Admin & so just picked whoever kissed his ass. DeSantis is different & knows how to build an effective team with no leaks.

Also Nuland started in the Clinton admin & the GWB admin foolishly kept her & promoted her.

Note: I regard McCarthy fairly positively, but it is what it is.

Republicans don't want to vote for more money for Ukraine. However, if the Democrats used it as a bargaining chip & said "we will give you $50b more for the Pentagon if you give us $20b for Ukraine" would Republicans cave in & say yes? Very likely.

Question is if even the Democrats want to help Ukraine had enough to be willing to spend political capital on it like that.

The only ones who actually do are the Baltic states and Poland, and they're of course wrong to feel threatened. Spain, Italy, even Germany do not feel threatened.

This is true & I also don't think Putin would attack NATO. If anything he would attack Georgia or something.

1
dekachin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was surprised that Matt Gaetz was warmongering against China. It looks like we're getting war one way or the other.

That's up to China. We won't fire the 1st shot.

As far as I can see, they have total power and are now even imprisoning the former president of the US. They may even lure back DeSantis into their fold.

The Elites are SPENDING their power & credibility, thus LOSING it. You can BUILD legitimacy or SPEND it. Lib elites have been spending it like fake Twitter Ukraine war hero James Vasquez spent his donations.

Eventually the bill comes due & the elites are overthrown. Then new elites have to start a legitimacy building phase until they get too arrogant & start spending.

I read that the Biden regime was commanding European countries to not sell chip technology to China. That is fucking our trade. I don't see your nightmare scenarios of Chinese hegemony. China has always been content keeping to itself and its immediate region, like the US before 1918.

China's ambitions are global. It isn't interested in being the world's sugar daddy like the US. It will be an empire in the true, evil sense. The sense where you post winnie the pooh anonymously in Europe & the local cops kick in your door that night & send you to the gulag.

You won't be able to sell any chips once China copies your designs & floods you with their knockoffs.

1
dekachin 1 point ago +1 / -0

China doesn't care about losing some of its excess population, though, in particular the elderly.

25
dekachin 25 points ago +25 / -0

This is only the beginning of a generational war to stop liberals from engaging in racism against whites & asians.

Very few, if any, affirmative action programs will stop because of this ruling. Liberals will not concede defeat & surrender their life's work. They will instead continue their racism & simply slap a different label on it.

True change will require myriad lawsuits against colleges for racial discrimination, slowly hammering these liberals until they reach the point where liability becomes a stronger concern than political ideology.

It's a long road & this is just the beginning.

4
dekachin 4 points ago +4 / -0

yeah even a small delay in account age & karma would stop the spammers.

5
dekachin 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think twitter is the only viable alternative but Elon needs to improve the video player.

5
dekachin 5 points ago +5 / -0

China continues to hide its COVID death toll. We may be able to put it together in a few years through indirect data, but even that is difficult because the CCP has put a ban on almost every kind of data imaginable to cover up its economic decline.

25
dekachin 25 points ago +25 / -0

Monopoly always leads to shit like this.

We need viable competitors so Youtube can get punished by consumers.

9
dekachin 9 points ago +9 / -0

One of my pet theories is that the CCP wanted to use COVID to murder all of China's old population in order to spare the government the need to take care of them.

But one of the more likely possibilities is that the CCP wanted to unleash COVID or something like it hoping that it would be devastating to the West & facilitate China's rise.

4chan posts from 2019 from a likely CCP agent who was in on the military program:

https://i.imgur.com/cyBY28S.png

Good chance the CCP goal was to release COVID intentionally in the US once it was "complete" but it escaped the lab early.

1
dekachin 1 point ago +1 / -0

BTW here is a short special 60 minutes did on Epps which I know everyone in here except maybe you would be like fAkE nEwS because they won't accept facts from anyone to the left of Tucker, but I found it to be convincing & compelling enough:

https://youtu.be/QHEEGxQKg20

2
dekachin 2 points ago +2 / -0

only white liberals are like this, fortunately, not all whites.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›