If they still haven't even found a single goddamn body of an indigenous child dating from residential schools then they should STFU already. Ground penetration radar has a high error rate and detects minerals not bodies. Finding bodies in a poorly kept gravesite completely unrelated to residential schools does not justify all the church burnings and undue money being embezzled to do absolutely nothing to help anyone. How does the removal of drug addicts and squatters equal to destruction and slander of religions and cultures whose crimes haven't even been proven with any definitive evidence?
What you've written is on par with stating that the George Floyd riots were acceptable because fentanyl is a drug.
The problem with the sexual assault as a reason for someone no longer tolerating the empire is that its cliched as heck and if your writing is on par with sword art online and other trash tier anime which repeatedly used sexual assault to push the plot along your story is awfully written.
Add in glacial pacing and I'm wondering exactly what the point of that scene was because it didn't really advance the plot and it certainly didn't distinguish itself from the many many other sexual assault scenes in other media.
Star trek could be considered progressive especially for its time but its extremely difficult to argue that it is woke. Wokeness consists of three key components:
-Hatred of tradition and the past to embrace new ways of doing things regardless of how flawed. This includes the destruction of beauty and history
-Minority worship and anti-white
-Emphasis on emotion over professionalism
All of these three components do overlap to some extent with each other (Hatred of tradition and history is often inspired by an emphasis on emotion and anti-white beliefs).
Star trek TOS wasn't anti-white and it respected history (the oft quoted scene where Abraham Lincoln says an oopsie word, apologies and is then told that he is not at fault comes to mind). The series regularly states that emotion and empathy are important but do not override duty and professionalism. The show did not appear to be hiring people based on immutable characteristics nor did it elevate minority characters in the cast as being above what the context would allow. Star trek clearly understood what beauty was so there's no need to even check if they were intentionally hiring horrifically deformed whales.
There is very little in Star trek TOS that could be called woke. An interracial kiss is hardly even all that noteworthy since interracial marriage was already allowed a year prior to the episode and received no noticeable backlash by the general public. It's most likely a product of the racially sensitive minds of our time that made this scene seem more important than it actually was. So we can't even argue this scene was progressive for its time when it was unanimously accepted by the people at the time.
A lot of that is already the case. Canadian pay is so bad that most families will pass their mortgages onto their kids. Post secondary education is extremely worthless and DEI has made pointless to look for employment even with heavy qualifications. The rich already are sheltered and insulated from the migrant crisis.
What prediction? It's already the case? Was that the joke?
According the above comment from Benevolentdictator the PPC naming debacle that ensured they didn't show up the on ballot in previous elections is over. For the first time there is someone from PPC in my riding as well though I've not seen any ads for them.
You are probably right about them not being blocked. Though they definitely can't use their name to run as the applications are denied.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Peoples_Political_Party
They don't seem to be running candidates in my area so I couldn't vote for them. All I know is I got my ballot and there was no Candidate from the party on it.
they cannot run under their name which is pretty darn important for recognition. Unless you directly look up who their candidate is, you won't be able to find them. Combine this with the constant deplatforming and its not hard to understand why they will rarely win a riding.
A live chicken costing only 10 dollars after a massive purge of the stock is pretty suspect and selling a horse for 9k is freaking huge profit margins (average horse is 1k not 9k).
Never mind the obvious retort that a single transaction between two neighbours does not accurately describe the full trade between two nations which is where a trade deficit actually matters as this dictates a general transfer of wealth and prosperity; this smug dude is ripping off his neighbour and calling the deal fair. Even without tarrifs this example demonstrates that this trade is unfair and his neighbour is being abused as badly as the US is. You justify tarrifs with this example because one dude is buying at margins the other is profiteering.
How can an animal not known for forming societies or groups who only want to not be stepped on be socialist? Though tbf garter snakes are one of the few species known to form social groups so they are definitely a socialist threat but the other types of snakes are incapable of socialism.
There hasn't been a non internal vote for him so yes he is unelected since people did not vote lib knowing that Carney would be PM. Sure we don't get to vote directly the PM but the party's intended PM heavily affects the voting.
But why does it warm Michelle's heart as a particular black man? That's not a kind of sentence you'd say by mistake unless you are ESL which really shouldn't be the case for Michelle.