They're only saying that because Charles is one of them.
Good. That's the only way the Tories will have a chance of winning the next election.
Hopefully he's learned his lesson that he can't please the left no matter how he bends over backwards for them. If Trump gets back in, I expect him to go full scorched-earth on the globalists with nothing left to lose. If Boris comes back, I expect the same.
Good. Fuck you. I hope you feel as stupid as you look.
Dr. Frankenstein asking who created the monster.
You can't ignore biology.
This is the major difference in opinion between us. We certainly agree that women are to blame for the overwhelming majority of societal problems. But while you seem to believe that the reasons for this are societal, I believe they are biological, which is why I don't agree with you that women's behaviour can be moderated by simply renegotiating the social contract. In any society with as much material abundance as ours, women will always behave the way they are behaving.
At the same time, and for the same reason, it will never be possible to convince most men to leave the reservation and go their own way. More men are doing it now than ever before, but biology means there will always be a legion of simps. It's inevitable.
Bullshit. Young men always say they don't want kids until they hit 30, and then suddenly they do.
The fact is that men's biological urge to protect and provide for a family is every bit as strong as the female urge to bear children. To say that it isn't is to buy into one of the biggest feminist lies.
I must congratulate you on the comprehensiveness with which you didn't read what I wrote.
majority of young men don't want kids
Men always want kids. Young men aren't having kids, partly because they can't find a woman worth having them with, and partly because they're afraid, perhaps rightly, that they'll never be able to adequately provide for them.
Women will support whomever can provide for them with a minimal amount of work on their part. Usually, that means voting leftist so they can get government money with no strings attached. In an economy as bad as this, when their gibs are worth almost nothing due to inflation, they'll vote for the party they think is most likely to help men start earning money again, so they can have their wage slaves back.
Postmodernists and elitists adore modern art because it supports all of their high-minded delusions. It's entirely subjective, and can be given meaning only by the person looking at it. As opposed to a landscape or a portrait, which has a meaning in and of itself because it portrays something real and intrinsically relatable. That's why ordinary people like traditional art; because it tells a story.
But the megalomaniacal elitists love the subjectivity of modern art because it is inherently nihilistic. It works the way they think the universe works: a formless, meaningless existence which can only be given meaning by them. And it makes them feel superior, to think that they're the only ones smart enough to understand that. It's never occurred to them that most people have actually thought about it and rejected it.
It think Stranger In A Strange Land and The Moon is a Harsh Mistress were meant more as Brave New World-like warnings about what societies with no moral grounding will eventually degenerate into.
subliminal messages from ruling class in children's TV
There's nothing subliminal about it.
A note to Zuck and the rest of the billionaire class: people would rather be miserable in the real world than live in your utopian fantasy. But, of course, if you make them too miserable. . . .
It's designed to turn you into a mindless little worker drone who knows how to do nothing other than sit still for hours on end doing low-grade clerical work.
Woman claims not to be responsible for her own actions. News at 11.
Okay white-knights. The only thing to do is invent a functioning, cheap and ubiquitous artificial womb. That way women won't ever need to bear children again. Go ahead. Make it happen. Beneficial side effects are that we won't need women anymore so we'll never again have to listen to this kind of pathetic, wanton bitching.
And yet, somehow, they can still afford fuel for their cars.
Support them in their struggle against the censorship regime that they advocated and championed for half a century, and which they still gleefully cheer for every time it's used against people like you?
That's not nuance. It's masochism.
Agreed. TERFs hate "transwomen" because they hate men. They have always hated men for the sake of hating men and for no better reason. Transwomen are just broken: they hate themselves for being men, largely because of the TERF indoctrination rhetoric that has permeated their entire lives up to this point.
Oh but let's absolutely defend her and the rest of the TERFs from the manic trannies because that will totally make them more sympathetic to free-speech arguments.
They're hoping that when the same policy magically appears in their TOS in six months' time, only with slightly more ambiguous wording, that everyone will have moved on and nobody will notice.
Is he wrong though? I mean, his Prophet was a pedophile and a rapist, and Islam treats men even worse than feminism does, but I this particular instance, where's the lie?
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be likelier to go to Heaven, yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth.
This very kindness stings of intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will, and cured of states which we may not even regard as disease, is to be put on a level with those who have not yet reached the age of reason, and those who never will; to be classed with infants, invalid and domestic animals.
C.S. Lewis
She's been in power a month and managed to tank the pound and destroy investor confidence. The Tories are also polling double digits behind Labour and she is the single most unpopular PM since polling began. On top of that, She's had a revolving door of a cabinet with more ministerial firings and resignations in a month than most administrations have in a year.
So she's hated by the financial institutions, and also by the public and by her own party.