7
You_Are_Based 7 points ago +7 / -0

The uncontrollable, unstoppable "haha gay" aspect of the monkeypox narrative could very well be singlehandedly responsible for it not being viable as another globohomo nwo wealth and rights transfer vehicle like covid was. Covid was at least at some point mysterious and therefore spooky.

8
You_Are_Based 8 points ago +8 / -0

Imagine acquiescing to the notion that you need a gay communist to intermediate between you and God. It is like a fresh humiliation ritual born out of the corpse of an older humiliation ritual that stopped being fun for them when it lost its edge.

3
You_Are_Based 3 points ago +9 / -6

bro it's a glowie bro, so never do anything, and never support anyone doing anything. Eventually this strategy will surely bring us cultural victory

Everything imp presents is about encouraging the most isolating and least effective possible mindset among young right wingers. Discourage everything that lifts a man or his culture up, encourage that which brings a man or his culture to a dead end. EveryoneIsAGlowyExceptUsSoys is a great example of that.

5
You_Are_Based 5 points ago +5 / -0

99.99999999% of all men who ever lived were "stormcuck" by the incel standard

4
You_Are_Based 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think most of them, the npc type, don't realize that this is what they want. I have talked to quote people unquote about this and often enough they say "but, robots" like the whole sentiment came from star trek and not a critical thought process about how society maintains itself

1
You_Are_Based 1 point ago +1 / -0

Combine the cost of healthcare with the discincentization of welfare and you get a situation where it could be easier on my family financially if I just died instead of getting an expensive injury or disease

2
You_Are_Based 2 points ago +2 / -0

What other problems are you referring to?

4
You_Are_Based 4 points ago +5 / -1

Great example, thank you. Gives me the ex redditor instinct to say I wish I could upvote you more than once.

16
You_Are_Based 16 points ago +16 / -0

Add no obligation to verify info to no obligation to serve and protect.

Cops could be ordered to enforce any policy and that policy doesn't actually have to be legal- allowing damage to be done before courts resolve it. They can also simply lie about tips and threats.

Someday cops will act very boldly against rulings across the fed/state line, and I'm not just talking about hunting pot plants. At that point we will just have to place our trust in local politicians not to abuse it to ensure our compliance to this or that :) :) :)

by folx
3
You_Are_Based 3 points ago +3 / -0

If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head.

by folx
2
You_Are_Based 2 points ago +2 / -0

someone else said it??.... it's ruined D:

You still haven't used the code phrase and besides, I warned you that I've said all I had to say and the rest will be compulsive insults. I can't help but have fun but I'm not gonna write you an original mein kampf if you can't even use the code phrase.

by folx
2
You_Are_Based 2 points ago +2 / -0

The more I argue with you, the better I come to know your dialectic. First you count on the stupidity of your adversary, and then, when there is no other way out, you yourself simply play stupid. If all this doesn't help, you pretend not to understand, or, if challenged, you change the subject in a hurry, quoting platitudes which, if I accept them, immediately relate to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, give ground and pretend not to know exactly what you are talking about. Whenever I try engage with one such apostle, my hand closes on a jelly-like slime which divides up and poures through my fingers, but in the next moment collected again.

But if I really strike you so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, you can't help but agree, and if I believe that this has taken you at least one step forward, my amazement is great the next day. The gatekeeper has not the slightest recollection of the day before, you rattle off the same old nonsense as though nothing at all has happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affecting amazement; you can't remember a thing, except that you have proved the correctness of your assertions the previous day.

by folx
3
You_Are_Based 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol okay Imp, so I should work out the following?

▪︎women are life's disney cartoon villain

▪︎they are the only such villain, bigot

▪︎race never had anything to do with civilization

Thanks. Yknow it's a talent to take something evvvveryone agrees on as much as "fuckin broads, man" and polarize it so well.

by folx
3
You_Are_Based 3 points ago +3 / -0

Okay so in the process of gatekeeping a white guy on the satanic temple, he responds to your argument by leaving it unaddressed and providing a divisive statement about women lol

right after telling me I'm projecting for saying he does that, in the same thread a post down :P

by folx
5
You_Are_Based 5 points ago +6 / -1

If you call me a stormcuck I WILL CRY so just don't even!!

In all seriousness, I'd say you need a history book on, oh, any civilization, ever. But that would be to incorrectly assume that your problem is ignorance and not an agenda of keeping uppity white sex-havers in check.

by folx
6
You_Are_Based 6 points ago +7 / -1

Yeah that darn u/You_Are_Based, using his mighty projection powers to force you to type gay incel things and gatekeep white people 24/7/365... darn him to heck!

17
You_Are_Based 17 points ago +17 / -0

To spar against women in public spaces in some socratic dialogue is a meme. Logic is how men decide what to do. Women like to talk about what men do from their alternative perspective founded in a different way of thought.

Makes me think about when my dog is mad that I'm vacuuming. I love that dog and value her happiness to an irrational degree but like, I'm gonna vacuum anyway lol. Guess what, she still wants dinner and a walk and when I do that the vacuum is forgiven or forgotten.

I realize how extremely sexist it is for me to use animals in a metaphor about women (and I am pretty sexist), but the takeaway is that since animals are not quite like me, I need to engage my sense of self agency when making decisions involving them. Not that women are literally like dogs lol. Like op says they are more like eternal teenagers.

by folx
11
You_Are_Based 11 points ago +12 / -1

It's about the idea of worshiping one's own sense of pleasure, basically. Promoting the things that damn your soul, which all have something in common in bringing us closer to animals.

by folx
7
You_Are_Based 7 points ago +8 / -1

That is a gatekeeping, incel promotion shill, and I know how that sounds but check the acct. Shouldn't be conflated with any consensus among the users here.

0
You_Are_Based 0 points ago +1 / -1

mad lib keywords and slap ill-fitting logical fallacies onto [women(bad)+linkheading]

Come on Imp you did that on purpose ;( use the code phrase so we can put this behind us

0
You_Are_Based 0 points ago +1 / -1

There is a possibility I made a fool out of myself: that you may actually be RealDrJester. I didn't pay attention to the style of prose being so similar down to the occasional use of bullet points. I only tagged to rib on the gatekeeping, agenda overlap, and literal cuck projection crutch.

So there I was, telling some sand dude that babies are important, and he replies "you've said nothing of value". The record scratched and I felt the need to explain how I got into this situation. Tl;dr, was baby from vagana. Maybe you can relate.

In all seriousness, maybe somewhere in the quantum realm there is a plane where it makes sense to call this "nothing of value", but I doubt it. Okay I lied, now I'm being serious: your focus on hating women is anal retentive misdirection of sexual failure (tl;dr your ass retains dick), or you are a literally a shill.

I can accept for instance, about myself, that I am eccentric. But am I laser-focused on a static agendized nuture/neg dialogue tree? You would have a hard time convincing me you are genuinely this mentally ill about women and NOTHING else. The chances of immutable topical focus on incel/mtgow over such an extended period coming from a casual, natural user are just a joke.

Speaking of quantum physics (just kidding), I've been really curious about bots lately. I think I've proven I'm not a bot, at least not one programmed to blend in the way it should. But any bot can play mad libs with a few keywords and slap ill-fitting logical fallacies onto [women(bad)+linkheading], so I'd like to ask you for an easy proof. Like if you could incorporate the phrase "and now I do this every day because I never got over her" in your reply that would seal the deal. Thanks.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›