She says in the thread that multiple authorities have already been alerted but in Weimerica I don't have any faith in authorities.
"Omg tons of infants are dying wtf"
"Worry not, citizen. The covid-19 vaccine is safe and effective"
"Uhhh ok"
Airing generalized sexual desperation out into the ether
The Chinese are spared it because their views on women make mine look tame.
This is putting the cart before the horse imo.
We both agree propaganda exists, and it sounds like we both agree that Chinese males have a different attitude towards women than western numales.
Americans are racist against blacks, but that doesn't stop (usually jewish-owned) organizations from blasting us with racemixing propaganda 24/7. And it has had its effect. If these organizations saw feminism in the Han destiny, they would not be shy.
It suggests that the role of feminism is not to do with restructuring the society's internal landscape, but instead is intended to affect it's performance i.e. reposturing the society in the global landscape
Because the point of promoting feminism is to destroy the host society. Means to an end. There's a reason complacent races like the Chinese are spared from the propaganda we suffer. We are fed propaganda to weaken us, Whites are not part of the global underclass scheme. Keeping with the Chinese as a counter-example, they are fed propaganda that promotes focus on family (to the EXTREME exclusion of their neighbors) and complacency (fear of government, reminders of surveillance, govt promoted narc campaigns, and on and on).
Most of them. Makes me think of Tolkien. He treated death differently, but it was almost always a man dying. I think we both probably understand the male sense of honor in sacrifice that Tolkien would invoke in those moments. It's just that society doesn't treat it that way anymore. Except under special narrative conditions (for instance when an "ally" character of fodder variety dies).
I really do think that if GRRM had placed ASOIF in, say, an African kingdom setting, showrunners adapting it in modern America would be squeamish about depicting "good guys" slaughtering civilians. In the same way that, if it were set in a ridiculous exclusively female society, they wouldn't slaughter those civilians.
If you ignore the racial element of the genocide propaganda narratives, the narratives in which the one kind of person is "fodder" and treated as less-than-human, you will only get part of the picture.
Fair, Imp. I was just thinking about the setting mirroring medieval Europe. War of the roses and stuff.
We have transitioned from post-truth to post-Alex
Move over, Redskull. Out of my way, Magneto. Mean internet troll coming through.
civilians don't count
That is retarded. How many main characters did Daenerys fry when she snapped near the end of GoT? The reaction of a legion of mouthbreathing girl-power watchers was OH LAWD WHY DANY I CANT EVEN!1
Civilian losses were one of a very exclusive few symboly, plotty, storytelling-like literary thingymajigs remaining in focus by the end of the show. Next showrunner: "It's game of thrones, civilians don't count!"
Bonus Narrative: Civilians are code for your European ancestors :)
The worst sin an idea can commit? Anti-semitism!
I think you nailed this and for me it is 3. I'm not saying women can't be genuine fans of things, but I've seen and experienced this a fuckin ton in my time
Well and concisely put. And I guess that gives me some sympathy for Jester but he really rubbed me the wrong way. I don't phrase things well or concisely so I'll just leave it at that.
I wasn't making an argument, I was just memeing. In terms of what we were talking about I guess you could say I'm trying to communicate that bias against average jews is a matter of taste just like bias against blacks. The JQ is a question about how to dismantle a power structure. There is distinction and both are valid feelings or questions for a person to have. Likewise, a bantu descendant with no taste for White culture, and who questions their place in White power structure, is operating perfectly within reason. "Racism" is a farce and is simply not amoral.
Yes: you are doing this in your complaint. That is what I am saying.
You happen to also be blaming others for doing what you are doing. Man above says "families" and you immediately expand it to all jews to aid your rhetoric and provide the sense of having gotten the last word, which like I said, is referred to as a pilpul. Pilpul being an actual real life behavioral stereotype, just in case you would really rather talk about cultural hate toward everyday jews.
I actually like Imp in my own way, I believe he is a real human being who is stuck scalp-deep in an ego-narrative crutch. We all have issues that make us look retarded to someone. His issues just happen to make him look retarded in KIA2, where there is no shortage of understanding in regard to factors driving wokery. By contrast I suspect he has almost no notoriety in The_Donald where there are less "stormfags" to get triggered when people with some of the least effective self-agency in the world are blamed for the world's problems. Jester on the other hand, I think he was a literal social media defense crew employee. I don't miss him a bit or believe he was ever a "real person" by most stretches of the phrase.
He wrote about specific families, while you are creating a strawman of his argument and using it to rush to their defense. If intentional, this is a great example of a pilpul, which touches on an actual reason why middle class jews outside of those specific families get hate.
They are complaining about Kanyebots over there too. Try rubbing your two IQ points together and look out the window before you predict the weather.
I spoonfed you the core problem with how you approach this stuff like two days ago and you have completely ignored it. Which is sad. Especially after you complaining about OTHER people arguing without "good faith". Come on.
Secret Service line:
He's doing it again, we got live cameras, Mendez, get the phone at 10 oclock 2 meters. Willoughby, Mason, move to block-out positions, stat. No, don't cut off the girl or he will go mobile, just bubble them. Mendez your next cam is 5 oclock about 4 meters
Archive breaks the Read More button
It would be dumb to "make an example" out of the him unless what he said was true and very sensitive. It is highly suggestive. It's much more persuasive than anything Alex Jones could have growled at me on a video hosting website, because it is a real demonstration and not an argument or appeal.
Yeah, dude felt there was a chance and that was good enough for him. God bless.
I think this headline should be the first in a series!
Just like a certain dystopian fiction author depicted