On its own. Sure.
But it was. A Factor.
I'm not calling bullshit on it because it was one of the reasons.
Hitler did not want the Rothschild's having a hand in Germany.
You're acting like the original image post and Hitler not wanting a Jewish banking system in Germany, can't both be true...
As for your default to "buh muh antisemitism". There's nothing anti Semitic about it, is one of the examples in image given Jewish, yes. But the actual point is they're pointing out that wars are started to keep the dollar in prime position...
Like EVERY fucking war ever. It's always about keeping something dominant, wether that be a specific religion, racial make up or in the context of this image.... Currency.
If anything it's more telling that you cherry picked that one thing, instead of any of the others...
No. It's a fact that the event happened. The number is just guesswork. That fact, may bother you, but it too is one.
Not to say it doesn't lesser the horror of it, but you don't need to inflate or exaggerate something that has no need to be.
A person is hit by a car and dies. It matters not wether one car hit them or forty. The person is still dead.
Natural assumption when you defaulted to "conspiracy theorists".
If you understand that a situation can be multifaceted, then you should apply the same to people, or face being called the opposite of what you call them appropo, ...
Heed your own words;.
Please cite where I said he did nothing wrong.
Acknowledging Hitler as a multifaceted Leader (wether you like it or not, he was one), is not absolving him of atrocities he and his regime caused.
Acknowledging there were multiple reasons for Germany to then, go to war is not tantamount to doing nothing wrong or being apologetic for it.
The treaty of Versailles and all its clauses were designed to be broken. As said previously, it wasn't a peace treaty it was a "let's delay this issue until later" tactic. Almost all treaties and amnesties are designed in this way.
The one that was imposed on Germany after WWII was exactly the same. Over punitive and designed to be broken.
Exactly, the problem I have with "Hitler is the devil"ists, is that they're looking at a dot-to-dot puzzle, ignoring all the dots they don't like, and connecting just the ones that draw the picture the want to see...
KEK
I had someone accuse me of suffering slavery the other day because I occasionally do free work. Ignoring that I still get paid for my standard work and the free work is generally simple stuff that puts me in good stead in future.
Meanwhile they're in a minimum wage ,minimum effort job demanding raises while doing jack all. They demand employer loyalty and show none because "it's slavery".
They see selfishness as agency. But it's not. Agency is social currency, of which most of them are bankrupt. Prime example, they have to petition their bosses for holiday or time off. Only to get denied or fucked around.
I on the other hand can flat out tell my boss, I'm off these days. And I'd still rather keep this job even if pay gets shitty, because I still have agency. I know that if things get difficult they'll support me.
But they see that the same as being s wage cagie.
It's something I miss about the UKs guilds and apprenticeship system. Guilds and apprenticeship leaders were very precise a out who they took, because it was permanent. Not because of a life contract (though it did happen) but because it was an investment. That apprentice would in 20-30 OWN that guild business and do it all again for another apprentice.
Now the much agency people are the actual slaves being dumped the moment they cost too much.
Yep Olympics stopped being national crew based decades ago. It's original purpose was lost as well.
It was meant to be used as effectively a pissing pot for war. You would send a contingency of your soldiers to compete as gladiators and it would demonstrate your armies abilities and strength. Effectively holding up a big sign "Fuck around and see.".
Then they slowly started training specialist units just for Olympics, then like other sports poaching people.
"Give them American nuclear weapons".
This is what the whole NATO Vs Russia push is about.
NATO IS PUSHING, the Ukraine border, and wants US controlled missile silos there.
Russia doesn't fancy having a NUCLEAR WEAPONS SITE on their border and does have a legal reason for claiming Ukraine still. ( People may not like it, but it's still there).
The problem is people are comparing it to other situations like Hong Kong/Beijing and still under the auspice of "my team good".
I've never seen diplomatic relations between the west and the east fall so rapidly since Biden came in.
It went from Trump having cordial meets to Biden stone walling.
It's why I hate this massive "you're anti vaxx" push as a defense for the behaviour.
Constantly hear the left bemoan how the medical services treat symptoms and don't cure or prevent and when the medical services ramp it up 1000% in the name of "pandemic" they don't blink.
I'm honestly surprised we didn't get hit with a Pandemic Tax by government under the same guise and the morons would have lapped it up.
The stupid thing is, they're not even paid shills. They're just zealots. I rank paid shills above useful idiots, because atleast paid shills are getting something out of it other than an autoimmune disease.
The difference is, the current form of it, requires them to have the burden of proof.
They have to Investigstet, collect and prove beyond a doubt. It can be challenged in court and people can slip the net.
This new bill means we incriminate ourselves. Worse still we incriminate our selves for potential FutureCrime of crimes that are not yet law.
Your name is in a register that they can use to blackmail you over and if the law changes go "AHA!"
If anything AoV at this point it looks like you are holding Imp to different standards, not that imp is using different standards.
If anyone else said things in a slightly hyperbolic manner, you seem to interpret them correctly and understand the meaning of their messages.
With Imp, you take him stone cold literally and nit pick.
It is PROVEN that governments monitor websites. Is it questionable that they're checking this specific one? Sure. But that doesn't refute imps point that they can and likely do.
Just like you're implying they're using human man power to monitor this and other sites, when you know full well they can just use scrapers.
You don't need to read minds either to make a good estimate of someone's behaviour. Carries behaviour has long been antimale, this is very apparent when you note her associations and meeting points. Much like we don't have to read minds to know that Imp will see the worst in women ( right or not) and that you will be right there nitpicking and cherry picking (again right or not).
They're now making law based on not action, not provable intent, but literal fees fees.
Yes we've had some borderline ones, but they still required proof. This one is now simply "I think you did it on purpose." Bam. Jail.
Abandon social media if you haven't already. If you have Facebook, you can't delete it. Everyone else who uses it and references you will create a "you shaped hole". So do your best to just unfriend everyone, private your profile (it should be anyway...), And if closing it, spam your timeline with just random shit. Avoid patterns. Fill it with memes, normie, edgy, lame. Fill it with generic "posts" about your pet dying, your last meal, or holiday trips to places you've never been. But in the long run if all your other friends are still using it.....
Where have we seen similar... Hmm since 2008... Something something microtransactions... Something something ... Digital media click per minute.
It's literally that but on a global scale as basis for the west's version of a Social Credit score.
Instead of your behaviour and undying loyalty to the gov tho, it's purchasing behaviour and undying loyalty to a corpo.
Again cherry picking.
The original post is saying whenever someone tries to separate from the dollar or refuses to accept it.. war is declared.
You are literally focusing in just one thing.