Top officials in China live really really well. Our politicians can only fantasize about how good they might live if they just serve up the population to a dystopia.
The Demented Asshole Administration wants to do the same thing here in the US. That whore Psaki announced it. Greenwald is criticizing it. Most people, especially on the left, approve it. Most just don't give a shit.
They're now making law based on not action, not provable intent, but literal fees fees.
Yes we've had some borderline ones, but they still required proof. This one is now simply "I think you did it on purpose." Bam. Jail.
Abandon social media if you haven't already. If you have Facebook, you can't delete it. Everyone else who uses it and references you will create a "you shaped hole". So do your best to just unfriend everyone, private your profile (it should be anyway...), And if closing it, spam your timeline with just random shit. Avoid patterns. Fill it with memes, normie, edgy, lame. Fill it with generic "posts" about your pet dying, your last meal, or holiday trips to places you've never been. But in the long run if all your other friends are still using it.....
Yes, she's puppeteering an entire country of 50 million people yet wisely spending her time reading comments on a marginal website very few people read.
I should have said I know her "intelligence" people are reading this.
And how exactly did you come to this knowledge?
When Prevent says they're tracking people of "other extremist ideology", they meant those who criticize women.
You mean those who hate women? After all, you have admitted to that, you just claimed that it is not 'misogyny' because it's justified, correct?
Even in fucking CCP China, you can call these wastes of space, wastes of space. The fact that we can criticize whatever puppet they give us isn't really a benefit.
Not sure what this is a response to. My point was that if I were puppeteering a country, I wouldn't be spending my valuable time reading comment on an irrelevant website.
There was a graph, I posted it a long time ago. Resources were redirected from Islamic extremism to "right-wing extremists" and "non ideological/other extremists" after the very, very questionable "incel shooting" with no manifesto and a string of male victims.
That does not sound implausible. But you claimed the you (1) know (2) her agents are reading (3) this [website]. Resources being redirected to their phantom obsessions does not prove that.
Did I admit to that? I don't recall. I feel like saying it would get an R16 ban, so I doubt I would. I do believe the existence of "misogyny" is about as logical as being a "Naziphobe".
I am pretty sure that you did, but even if you didn't, you are here confirming it by saying that the only reason you wouldn't is because you would get banned, not because you do not believe it.
So you don't want resources redirected to keeping track of people who hate women. I agree with you on that. But at least be honest.
Just because they pretend to give a choice, people think it's better. But if you can't find a single party that will openly oppose feminism, then you aren't picking your leader. They are.
You're so, so, so close.
What I was saying there is that we aren't free just because we can criticise our leaders. The UK is under a regime just as autocratic as the countries it criticizes.
I agree with that. But I asked you why that concubine would be reading this website though. Would that not be a giant waste of her time, if she's supposed to puppeteer England?
If you think she isn't having them keep an eye on everyone who looks at her as the puppet master of the failing UK...
I thought you said you 'knew' it. Seems like standards for what counts as 'knowledge' are different when you are speaking.
I'm not confirming anything. I'm just saying I wouldn't have said that because it would be a ban.
It is a confirmation, otherwise you'd have said "No, I don't believe that". You do.
Considering Carrie's crusade against "incel violence" took monitoring off a convicted extremist who later killed an MP, I don't think I even need to say anything on the topic of it being a bad idea. Not as if she cares, men are below her anyway, in her mind.
I guess now you can read minds from a distance as well. But feel free to show me that it was a crusade against 'incel violence' that took that terrorist from off the monitoring - that would be nice ammunition. While you're at it, you could show that the concubine was responsible for it.
To what?
To seeing things as they are. If it weren't for your blinding hatred for the females of the opposite sex.
Like I said at the beginning, I bet she has her agents report to her on whether people have worked out what's going on yet.
Smart, you're now making bets that cannot be proven false, as opposed to your previous ones which you all lost.
Hasn't passed yet but 100% will as 99% of our mps are spastics.
51 weeks for misinformation and must remove "legal but harmful" content
The US has just reintroduced the Earn it act which is attacking encryption which is the main purpose of the online safety bill
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/02/its-back-senators-want-earn-it-bill-scan-all-online-messages
Yet our western politicians still pretend we are any better than china
These spineless nuggets really want to be like communist china
Top officials in China live really really well. Our politicians can only fantasize about how good they might live if they just serve up the population to a dystopia.
The Demented Asshole Administration wants to do the same thing here in the US. That whore Psaki announced it. Greenwald is criticizing it. Most people, especially on the left, approve it. Most just don't give a shit.
Speech and voting doesn't seem to work. After the soap box and the ballot box comes the bullet box.
They're now making law based on not action, not provable intent, but literal fees fees.
Yes we've had some borderline ones, but they still required proof. This one is now simply "I think you did it on purpose." Bam. Jail.
Abandon social media if you haven't already. If you have Facebook, you can't delete it. Everyone else who uses it and references you will create a "you shaped hole". So do your best to just unfriend everyone, private your profile (it should be anyway...), And if closing it, spam your timeline with just random shit. Avoid patterns. Fill it with memes, normie, edgy, lame. Fill it with generic "posts" about your pet dying, your last meal, or holiday trips to places you've never been. But in the long run if all your other friends are still using it.....
Yes, she's puppeteering an entire country of 50 million people yet wisely spending her time reading comments on a marginal website very few people read.
And how exactly did you come to this knowledge?
You mean those who hate women? After all, you have admitted to that, you just claimed that it is not 'misogyny' because it's justified, correct?
Not sure what this is a response to. My point was that if I were puppeteering a country, I wouldn't be spending my valuable time reading comment on an irrelevant website.
That does not sound implausible. But you claimed the you (1) know (2) her agents are reading (3) this [website]. Resources being redirected to their phantom obsessions does not prove that.
I am pretty sure that you did, but even if you didn't, you are here confirming it by saying that the only reason you wouldn't is because you would get banned, not because you do not believe it.
So you don't want resources redirected to keeping track of people who hate women. I agree with you on that. But at least be honest.
You're so, so, so close.
I agree with that. But I asked you why that concubine would be reading this website though. Would that not be a giant waste of her time, if she's supposed to puppeteer England?
I thought you said you 'knew' it. Seems like standards for what counts as 'knowledge' are different when you are speaking.
It is a confirmation, otherwise you'd have said "No, I don't believe that". You do.
I guess now you can read minds from a distance as well. But feel free to show me that it was a crusade against 'incel violence' that took that terrorist from off the monitoring - that would be nice ammunition. While you're at it, you could show that the concubine was responsible for it.
To seeing things as they are. If it weren't for your blinding hatred for the females of the opposite sex.
Smart, you're now making bets that cannot be proven false, as opposed to your previous ones which you all lost.