Yes, she's puppeteering an entire country of 50 million people yet wisely spending her time reading comments on a marginal website very few people read.
I should have said I know her "intelligence" people are reading this.
And how exactly did you come to this knowledge?
When Prevent says they're tracking people of "other extremist ideology", they meant those who criticize women.
You mean those who hate women? After all, you have admitted to that, you just claimed that it is not 'misogyny' because it's justified, correct?
Even in fucking CCP China, you can call these wastes of space, wastes of space. The fact that we can criticize whatever puppet they give us isn't really a benefit.
Not sure what this is a response to. My point was that if I were puppeteering a country, I wouldn't be spending my valuable time reading comment on an irrelevant website.
There was a graph, I posted it a long time ago. Resources were redirected from Islamic extremism to "right-wing extremists" and "non ideological/other extremists" after the very, very questionable "incel shooting" with no manifesto and a string of male victims.
That does not sound implausible. But you claimed the you (1) know (2) her agents are reading (3) this [website]. Resources being redirected to their phantom obsessions does not prove that.
Did I admit to that? I don't recall. I feel like saying it would get an R16 ban, so I doubt I would. I do believe the existence of "misogyny" is about as logical as being a "Naziphobe".
I am pretty sure that you did, but even if you didn't, you are here confirming it by saying that the only reason you wouldn't is because you would get banned, not because you do not believe it.
So you don't want resources redirected to keeping track of people who hate women. I agree with you on that. But at least be honest.
Just because they pretend to give a choice, people think it's better. But if you can't find a single party that will openly oppose feminism, then you aren't picking your leader. They are.
You're so, so, so close.
What I was saying there is that we aren't free just because we can criticise our leaders. The UK is under a regime just as autocratic as the countries it criticizes.
I agree with that. But I asked you why that concubine would be reading this website though. Would that not be a giant waste of her time, if she's supposed to puppeteer England?
Yes, she's puppeteering an entire country of 50 million people yet wisely spending her time reading comments on a marginal website very few people read.
And how exactly did you come to this knowledge?
You mean those who hate women? After all, you have admitted to that, you just claimed that it is not 'misogyny' because it's justified, correct?
Not sure what this is a response to. My point was that if I were puppeteering a country, I wouldn't be spending my valuable time reading comment on an irrelevant website.
That does not sound implausible. But you claimed the you (1) know (2) her agents are reading (3) this [website]. Resources being redirected to their phantom obsessions does not prove that.
I am pretty sure that you did, but even if you didn't, you are here confirming it by saying that the only reason you wouldn't is because you would get banned, not because you do not believe it.
So you don't want resources redirected to keeping track of people who hate women. I agree with you on that. But at least be honest.
You're so, so, so close.
I agree with that. But I asked you why that concubine would be reading this website though. Would that not be a giant waste of her time, if she's supposed to puppeteer England?