I see your thought pattern went the same direction as mine, but we ended up at different conclusions, because there is an issue here.
You aren't wrong that useful idiots can be convinced that any movement is "the good guys", even ours (if you can even say that we have a shared movement). The trouble is the same reason useful idiots are shot after they've served their usefulness. They can always be convinced of another revolutionary ideology and, given enough time, subversive elements will work their way into positions where they can manipulate idiots.
The classic response to this is totalitarianism, which I believe is the conclusion our globalist overlords have come to. Yet, this brings me to question "if totalitarianism is the only way to prevent subversives from wielding fools like a weapon, what good is there in replacing the current totalitarians with my own (other than that now I'll be the one in charge)?". I haven't found an answer.
Some cunning and devious spiders realized that a large swath of humanity is gullible and/or stupid enough to not be capable of grasping the lessons Hilter & the 3rd reich should have taught them. It wasn't "nazis bad" & "jews are special", it was "question your leadership" & "scapegoating is always nefarious".
Maybe the real reason history repeats itself is because there is always a high proportion of the human population that require others to tell them what their morality and stance should be for any given situation.
Throw away the feeling you have indicated from the statement "Some of the things is so obvious its stupid.", because they feel the exact same way about what you believe.
That might come off as "muh both sides", but I think only a balanced and honest evaluation of ourselves and our opponents is going to help prevent us from becoming a mere reflection of them.
Then again, I think you're already on the wrong foot. Our enemies aren't just "the commies". Like ernsithe said, "If they weren't easily manipulated...". They aren't our opponents simply because they're pseudo-marxists, but really because they're easily manipulated.
However, that statement needs expansion, because the umbrella of "the easily manipulated" covers more than a bunch of retarded queer trans furry tankies. Yet, I really don't want to make this rant even longer. Take it this way: neocons and neolibs drink from the same cup, useful idiots are on both sides, and meaningful change might require people you fundamentallly disagree with, but still love/care about, to die.
What you do with that is on you.
Or accept the lesson the left taught us in 2020, which was that violence is the only option we have now. There is no more reason for debate or discussion, when violence that is beneficial to your opponent will be ignored, denied, and excused. They are only crying out because this violence doesn't benefit them this time.
When the lives of people have been ruined by months of lockdowns and riots, we were told it was just. Yet, we get one day of rioting aimed at the politicians we all know to be corrupt, and this is called treason. I would gladly call myself a traitor for the opportunity to trade the life of a disgusting oligarch to save the life of a fellow citizen. Let them call us all traitors, for the opinions of the establishment's whores are worth less than nothing.
What shade was the skin of the guy taking the knee?
This crime was committed in 2016. Funny that the news report doesn't mention the race of the shooter/property owner, or how they were living in the hood too and had to worry about what little money she had being stolen. Wanna guess why BLM never showed up to protest the shooting of this black man?
SERVICE GUARANTEES CITIZENSHIP
Not only do we need some level of sacrifice to obtain citizenship, but we also need greater disparity between the citizen and the noncitizen. It's not just citizenship as a birthright or prize of marriage that devalues it, it's also the lack of incentive. Noncitizens should not be able to own land or businesses, or benefit from social programs and citizen protections. As terrible as this comes off, maybe we should have had distinct rights for noncitizens that created greater desire to be a citizen.
"B-but why didn't he shoot them in the legs?!?"
Did you get any pushback from your employer?
some of these strawman arguments have become so pervasive that you will find people making that argument without realizing they are repeating a lie
And as more time goes on, I realize more and more that most of progressivism's growth is owed to this. A shockingly large amount of the human population has no real beliefs or perspectives, other than what they are told is right and wrong by their thought leaders. So many people have never thought about anything further than what they have heard most recently. Truly.
There is but one way out of this mess, and one road to follow. Accelerate!!!
"If you don't die a hero, you live long enough to see yourself become the villain"
Gotta get to the hard times first.
Don't look at me. I keep telling my long-term gf that I'm not going to marry her and we've agreed to keep our finances separate. I don't know what the appeal of simping is.
How do you think women will feel if they started being called "Type 2s" instead of "women"?
I'm sure many won't like it at all, but I'm not going to balk. In fact, I say this is all to the good. Women are primarily the pushers of this shit and a culture of weak men are just along for the ride; thus, this cannot die unless there is a major schism among women, at least as we are now.
It's not really meant to be an argument.
Although, I will argue that if we know where this is headed, and we have been calling it out for years now, then we clearly have not been putting out "a winning argument" so far.
Liberalism is dying. I can't say whether calling for bloody revolution is or is not "a winning argument" at this point, but I can say that traditional liberal argument, through conversation and debate, is definitely a losing strategy at this point.
I know it's always been a big taboo with KiA, but do I really have to say "Unless we actually kill them..." at this point?
Might be a while. We're not ready or angry enough to come to terms with what must be done. My worst fears are realized, I won't be young and able enough to do anything once the tide turns, if I'm even alive at all.
This is the inevitable outcome. If they want racial identitarianism, they're going to get it.
Soros isn't the only one in on this game. They're just trying to shove the physical element of BLM (the rioters and protesters) back in the box. The "leadership", who's job is to launder large sums of money, sprinkle as little of that money as necessary to keep thugs obeying, and then setting those thugs loose, is closing up shop. They're going into hibernation until BLM is needed again.
The time for debate and discussion is over. They showed over the last 4 years that there is no room for conversation, only room for their victory. Gaslighting means nothing if you cram your fist in their mouth when they open it to speak their faith.
What are they using to coordinate, now that social media tries to prevent them from being able to? Asking because I'd like to join in.
I completely agree.
I am by no means atheist, although I would never dream to attempt to explain what the unknowable "God" might be.
I don't completely fault atheists for hating religion. Organized religion functions just like non-religious organizations and ends up being corrupted from within.
Yet, I will say something for the atheists reading this thread. There is a reason so many religions and cultures across history have some form of lesson or story on an endless cycle of death & rebirth/creation & destruction. Our societies may turn from God, but when the chips are down they will go crawling back.