I still maintain that Pfizer wasn't supposed to be the mega-corp that released the vaccine, so the media are trying to undermine Pfizer's vaccine while they wait until they can promote Gates' Vaccine.
This looks like Big Pharma battling Globalist supported Big Pharma over territory.
It's like when the Oil Industry takes on Eco-Fascism.
IBTimes - This Nurse Got COVID-19 After Being Vaccinated. Here's How
Matthew received the Pfizer vaccine as a healthcare employee, who works at two different San Diego local hospitals, on Dec. 18. He said he started feeling ill on Christmas Eve as he suffered from chills, muscle aches, and fatigue, the news outlet said.
On Dec. 26, he went to a drive-up hospital coronavirus testing site, where he tested positive for the virus.
Matthew is not the only case of a person getting the vaccine and then contracting COVID-19.
Dr. Christian Ramers, an infectious disease specialist with Family Health Centers of San Diego, told KGTV that he knows of several other cases in the San Diego area with healthcare workers, saying this shows that the vaccine results are not immediate and the drug does not offer full protection.
Well, isn't this embarrassing. Not only that, but the article then employs doublethink to justify more people taking the vaccine.
Despite the high rate of effectiveness, Dr. Ramers, who also sits on the clinical advisory panel for the U.S. vaccine rollout, explained that the possibility of getting the virus after the vaccine is “not unexpected.”
"The vaccine doesn't work, but we expected it to be ineffective". Suuure you did.
He continued by saying, “If you work through the numbers, this is exactly what we’d expect to happen if someone was exposed.”
Matthew may have been infected with the virus at the time he received the vaccine or he may have become infected after receiving the vaccine as he the vaccine takes time to work, Ramers told KGTV.
They knew he could still be infected, and didn't ensure he had time off to ensure he wouldn't be because....? Or maybe, they're completely full of shit and had no idea the vaccine wasn't as effective as they claimed. Imagine my shock.
Known to you perhaps. Meanwhile, the British government was suggesting that vaccine cards be issued to people who have taken the vaccine, with no waiting time period stated.
Maybe, if safety measures weren't so politicised, we'd have more informed individuals talking about health and safety measures. Instead, you either support the narrative or you're wrong, which is completely unscientific, and leaves everyone unable to come to the truth.
I still maintain that Pfizer wasn't supposed to be the mega-corp that released the vaccine, so the media are trying to undermine Pfizer's vaccine while they wait until they can promote Gates' Vaccine.
This looks like Big Pharma battling Globalist supported Big Pharma over territory.
It's like when the Oil Industry takes on Eco-Fascism.
Holy fuck, that's a mangled sentence.
Lol. You have to wait 90 days to be tested after getting the scam vaccine. Of fucking course he tested positive.
It works with every vaccine. The sheep still bah.
I’m not taking it. I upright refused at my workplace.
Did you get any pushback from your employer?
IBTimes - This Nurse Got COVID-19 After Being Vaccinated. Here's How
Well, isn't this embarrassing. Not only that, but the article then employs doublethink to justify more people taking the vaccine.
"The vaccine doesn't work, but we expected it to be ineffective". Suuure you did.
They knew he could still be infected, and didn't ensure he had time off to ensure he wouldn't be because....? Or maybe, they're completely full of shit and had no idea the vaccine wasn't as effective as they claimed. Imagine my shock.
They never claimed you'd be immune at 95% rate before a week after your second shot.
A week after one shot is only 50% protective.
Known to you perhaps. Meanwhile, the British government was suggesting that vaccine cards be issued to people who have taken the vaccine, with no waiting time period stated.
Maybe, if safety measures weren't so politicised, we'd have more informed individuals talking about health and safety measures. Instead, you either support the narrative or you're wrong, which is completely unscientific, and leaves everyone unable to come to the truth.
Well, you could issue them with the second vaccine. You'd just have an "effective date" that's whatever the wait time after being vaccinated is.